Engineering topics

Fiskum, Sandra K.

Publications and source records attributed to Fiskum, Sandra K..

11 records

DOE OSTI2022

Evaluation of Load Behavior for Select Analytes in Hanford Tank Waste

Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) inorganic ion exchanger is a candidate material for remediation of highly alkaline (pH > 14) aqueous nuclear waste streams containing high sodium concentrations (>5 M). In this work, ion exchange column testing with wastes from Hanford tanks AP-105, AP-107, and AW-102 was carried out to study the uptake of 137 Cs to estimate the decontamination factor (DF) value. Additionally, DF values for uptake of Al, Ca, Pb, Np, Pu, U, and Sr were determined and the ion exchange capacity of CST toward these analytes was estimated. Limited data is available on the load behavior of other minor and trace elements with recent CST production lots and this characterization will help improve understanding of the behavior of CST and assist in identifying potential disposition pathways as well as assessing removal capabilities of CST for other components.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2022

Ion Exchange Processing of AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste through Crystalline Silicotitanate in a Staged 2- then 3-Column System (Rev.1)

The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS), will send initial low-activity Hanford waste tank supernate feeds to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility. In addition to entrained solids removal from the supernate, the primary goal of TSCR is to remove cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) by ion exchange, allowing contact handling of the liquid effluent product at the WTP. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media, manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC (product IONSIVTM R9140-B), was selected as the ion exchange media at TSCR. CST is a non-elutable inorganic material that has demonstrated robust chemical, physical, and radiation tolerance while maintaining functionality. However, exchange kinetics of Cs onto CST is slow, resulting in low utilization of the CST Cs load capacity before unacceptable Cs breakthrough. Two process flow designs have been tested, as follows. 1. Lead-lag column processing: The lead column was removed after the lag column effluent reached the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit, the lag column was moved into the lead position, and a new lag column was installed. This format used ~52% Cs load capacity on the lead column. 2. Lead-lag-polish column processing: The processing was stopped when the polish column effluent reached the WAC limit. This format resulted in 81% Cs load capacity on the lead column. Testing with diluted feed from Hanford tank AP-105 (AP-105DF) incorporated a nuanced change to the lead-lag-polish column system where the polish column was inserted when the lag column effluent reached WAC limit. A 10.9-L volume of AP-105DF (diluted to 5.6 M Na) was processed through the Direct Feed Test Platform system, established at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to support small-scale waste qualification efforts. The columns consisted of 10-mL CST beds (CST Lot 2002009604, sieved to screen out >30-mesh particles) placed in 1.5-cm-inner-diameter columns. Feed was processed at 1.83 bed volumes (BV) per hour; the flowrate, in terms of contact time with the CST bed, matched the expected flowrate at TSCR. The <30-mesh CST sieve cut was expected to provide appropriate performance scaling to a full-height column. The installation of the polish column later in processing (after processing 523 BVs) did not appear to fundamentally change the utilization of the lead column for Cs exchange nor did it extend the total feed processing volume when compared to the previous test with AP-107 feed. Table ES.1 and Figure ES.1 summarize the measured AP-105DF Cs load performance.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Impact of feed variability on cesium removal with multiple actual waste samples from the Hanford site

Here, the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), will send initial low-activity Hanford waste tank supernate feeds to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility. In addition to entrained solids removal from the supernate, the primary goal of TSCR is to remove cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) by ion exchange, allowing contact handling of the liquid effluent product at WTP. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media, manufactured by Honeywell UOP (product IONSIV™ R9140-B), was selected as the ion exchange media at TSCR. This lot of material was found to have superior performance in comparison to historic batches of CST. Ion exchange column and batch contact testing with supernate from Hanford tanks AP-105, AP-107 and AW-102 was performed to assess the impact of feed variability on system performance. These tests demonstrated that batch contact measurements provide a reasonable prediction of column capacities with some deviation in performance attributed to column dynamics. In addition, the variability in CST capacity for cesium in the various actual waste samples does not track with historical understanding of the competing cations, suggesting that tank waste samples contain other components that may significantly impact cesium loading.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

A newly proposed isotherm model to predict Cs exchange with crystalline silicotitanate in tank waste simulants

The Zheng Anthony Miller (ZAM) computer model, a multicomponent ion exchange model used to predict the exchange of Group I metals onto crystalline silicotitanate (CST), has historically been used to predict Cs distribution coefficients from Hanford and Savannah River Site (SRS) tank waste simulants. Comparison of experimentally determined Cs distribution coefficients from tank waste simulants with ZAM isotherm model predictions indicate overprediction of Cs and K distribution coefficients for simple and complex simulants with the engineered form of CST. Additionally, recent changes in chemical composition/manufacturing of IONSIV TM R9140-B have resulted in increased Cs capacity from high-salt, highly alkaline solutions. Here, this work served to assess different isotherm models and refine equilibrium parameters to develop a model that can be applied to Hanford and SRS tank waste Cs removal efforts. Toward this goal, the Campbell Westesen Peterson (CWP) model was developed. This model utilized the experimentally determined Cs capacity, and simplified ZAM equilibria expressions to include only the binary substitution of Cs + or K + on the Na + sites. Equilibrium constants for these equations were refined using experimentally determined distribution coefficients. Overall, the CWP model significantly improved our ability to predict both Cs and K loading capacity from complex matrices.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Cesium Exchange onto Crystalline Silicotitanate from Blended Hanford Tank Wastes

The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system was developed to filter and remove cesium (Cs and 137 Cs) from Hanford tank waste supernate in preparation for vitrification. The Cs removal will be conducted with crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media. Under the planned waste-processing strategy, the tank waste supernate will be queued for TSCR processing in tank 241-AP-107 (AP-107). Once AP-107 tank waste volume is sufficiently depleted, the waste supernate from tank 241-AP-105 (AP-105, the holding tank before transfer to AP-107) will be transferred to tank AP-107. Supernate from another tank will be transferred to the holding tank, AP-105, for eventual transfer to tank AP-107. These supernate streams will undergo blending in tanks AP-107 and AP-105; the volume blend ratios will be driven by how much the tank waste supernate volumes are depleted before the next tank waste is added. The consequence of tank waste blending on Cs uptake by CST was of interest and was tested via batch contacts; results are reported herein.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of CST Post-Processing AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste

The primary goal of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS), is to remove entrained solids and 137 Cs from the Hanford tank waste supernate to expedite production of low-activity waste. Ion exchange (IX) testing of 10.9 L of waste from Hanford tank 241-AP-105 (AP-105), performed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, used a lead-lag-polish column format, with a bed volume of 10 mL per column, to decontaminate tank waste supernate using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) as the IX media. The AP-105 Cs IX processing test, discussed elsewhere, resulted in a shorter transition zone (i.e., steeper load curve) than those defined by wastes from tanks 241-AP-107 and 241-AW-102.1 The shorter transition zone was indicative of a matrix effect retarding Cs capacity. Therefore, aliquots of spent CST from the lead, lag, and polish columns were subjected to a digestion protocol to quantify analytes retained by the CST and extrapolate the impact on Cs capacity. The spent CST was digested using a combination of 5 M HNO 3 and H 2 O 2 with vigorous heating and stirring. Due to the radiation dose accompanying the 137 Cs on the CST columns, a secondary Cs separation by ammonium molybdophosphate embedded in polyacrylonitrile (AMP-PAN) was performed to separate the 137 Cs from the CST so the samples could be contact-handled for analysis outside of a shielded facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Reduced Temperature Cesium Removal from AP-107 Using Crystalline Silicotitanate

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Spent Crystalline Silicotitanate Storage Study—Post AP-105DF Processing

A Tank-Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system is under development by Washington River Protection Solutions to support initial production of immobilized low-activity waste (LAW) by feeding Hanford tank supernate from tank farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Facility. Tank waste supernate will be filtered to remove suspended solids and then Cs will be removed by processing it through crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC. The Cs-loaded CST columns will be stored indefinitely, with a goal of eventual CST removal and treatment. Thus, the spent CST needs to be recoverable after undetermined storage time. Previous testing with AP-105 simulant showed that rinsing the CST bed with 3 bed volumes (1.4 apparatus volumes [AVs]) of 0.1 M NaOH resulted in a dried bed that maintained flow characteristics indicative of ease of recovery. This study explored the intermediate conditions (between feed dried in place and the 1.4 AVs of 0.1 M NaOH rinse) to evaluate CST bed properties after: 1) stoppage with feed in place; 2) stoppage after draining feed; 3) stoppage after 0.7 AV of 0.1 M NaOH rinse through column; 4) stoppage after 1.5 AVs of 0.1 M NaOH rinse through column. Post processing, each column was heated at 50 °C for 19 days under pseudo-storage conditions to simulate the expected dried and stored CST bed conditions. Testing was conducted at the small scale (12-mL bed volume); actual, Cs-depleted, AP-105 tank waste was used as the feed. Post-dried CST bed physical properties (angle of repose and penetration depth) were measured to evaluate how CST moved and flowed. All process stop-conditions resulted in a solidified CST bed except for the final condition, 1.5 AVs of 0.1 M NaOH rinse. At this small scale, the three CST beds presented an issue for retrievability after the short storage period (19 days at 50 °C). The latter case confirmed the results from simulant testing. The testing was intended to provide a preliminary assessment of issues that may arise from desiccation of CST during storage with the indicated salt solutions in place. Since these were small-scale tests, the processing system did not scale to full scale conditions exactly; however, the tests did provide insight into the impact on the dried and stored CST bed after stopping processing at an earlier step (upset condition) than normal. These results indicate that if an upset condition occurs at TSCR, a dilute hydroxide rinse should be considered before the CST dries from internal heating.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Cesium Ion Exchange Testing Using Crystalline Silicotitanate with Hanford Tank Waste 241-AP-107

At the time of this testing, the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) was to provide for the initial production of immobilized low-activity waste by feeding Hanford tank supernate from tank farms to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility for immobilization. Washington River Protection Solutions requested that Hanford tank waste collected from tank 241-AP-107 (hereafter called AP-107) be processed using conceived pretreatment steps (suspended solids removal by filtration, Cs removal by ion exchange) then vitrified. A small-scale test platform to demonstrate the solids filtration, Cs removal, and LAW vitrification was constructed and installed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Bench-scale ion exchange testing with approximately 9 L of AP-107 supernate was conducted using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media. The IONSIV R9140-B CST was provided by Honeywell UOP, LLC in 2018 (Batch 2081000057). The ion exchange media was first tested with simulant and was previously described. This report describes the Cs ion exchange batch contact and column test results with the AP-107 tank waste. Batch contact testing helps to evaluate CST performance on tank waste supernate prior to processing it in the ion exchange columns. Batch contacts were performed with the waste at four Cs concentrations at a phase ratio of 200 (liquid volume to exchanger mass) with AP-107. The distribution coefficient (K d ) at the equilibrium condition of 8.57 µg Cs/mL (AP-107 feed condition) was determined to be 669 mL AP-107/g CST. With a CST bed density of 1.00 g/mL, this K d corresponded to a predicted 50% Cs breakthrough of 669 bed volumes (BVs). The Cs load capacity at the equilibrium feed condition was determined to be 7.5 mg Cs/g dry CST. The column testing was prototypic to the intended LAWPS operations in a lead-lag column format, although on a small-scale basis with 10-mL CST beds. The feed was processed downflow through the lead column and then through the lag column at ~2.2 BV/h. Loading continued until the lag column reached the WTP waste acceptance criteria (WAC) for receiving supernatant waste for vitrification (a function of the Na and 137 Cs concentrations). For AP-107, the WAC is 0.114% of the influent 137 Cs concentration; this required a Cs decontamination factor of 876. The Cs effluent from the lag column reached the WAC after processing ~410 BVs. To keep the subsequent product effluent below the WAC, a replacement lag column was prepared, the lead column was removed from service (after processing a total of 471 BVs), the lag column was put into the lead column position, and the replacement lag column was installed. Feed processing continued and after another ~290 BVs the Cs effluent from the lag column again exceeded the WAC. In both cases, the lead columns only reached 25% Cs breakthrough before removal. Although 50% Cs breakthrough was not reached, this value was estimated and averaged based on extrapolation of the loading curves (640 BVs) and agreed within 4% of the predicted 50% Cs breakthrough from batch contact test results (669 BVs). Table ES.1 summarizes the observed column performance and relevant Cs loading characteristics.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Temperature Effect of Cesium Exchange onto Crystalline Silicotitanate in AP-107 and AP-105 Hanford Tank Wastes and Two Simulants

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) is charged with the development of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system to process Hanford tank waste supernates in preparation for vitrification. In addition to a filtration step, TSCR will remove cesium (Cs) using ion exchange columns filled with crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media. CST is produced by Honeywell UOP, LLC. The documented safety analysis (DSA) developed for the TSCR system limits a single column loading to 141,600 Ci 137 Cs. Given a 137 Cs isotopic mass fraction of 20% and the planned CST bed size of 596 L (157.5 gal) in a TSCR column, this equates to 0.10 mmole Cs per g CST (Cs distribution coefficient, K d , 1400 mL/g). Factors that influence Cs uptake by CST include (but are not limited to) (1) CST production (lot-to-lot variations), (2) contact temperature, (3) contact duration, (4) competitors in the tank waste feed, (5) anionic composition of the tank waste feed, and (6) the 137 Cs isotopic mass fraction (differs slightly among tank wastes and decreases with time).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Maximum Cs-137 Curie Loading onto Crystalline Silicotitanate for the Documented Safety Analysis of the Tank Side Cesium Removal Platform

The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system is currently being constructed to process Hanford tank waste supernates for vitrification. TSCR incorporates a filtration system and cesium (Cs) removal system using columns filled with crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchanger, produced by Honeywell UOP, LLC. The documented safety analysis (DSA) developed for TSCR limits a single column curie loading to 141,600 Ci; given a 137 Cs isotopic mass fraction of 20% and the planned CST bed size of a TSCR column, this equates to 0.10 mmole Cs per g CST. Factors that influence 137Cs loading onto the CST include, but are not limited to, CST production lot (different production lots behave differently), contact temperature, contact duration, 137Cs mass fraction, and competitors in the tank waste feed. Seventeen tank waste feeds (compositions) were identified by Washington River Protection Solutions to be processed through TSCR. These feed compositions were used to develop a simulant (referred to herein as Stage 1) that would provide an upper bound to the Cs loading onto CST based on maximizing the Cs/Na activity coefficient ratios in solution while maintaining Na at no less than 5.0 M. Building upon this Stage 1 simulant, a series of four additional simulants were developed based on the cationic/anionic species that impact Cs exchange, with each successive formulation relaxing one or more matrix component concentration constraints as show in Table S.1

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗