Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Finch, Robert J.

Publications and source records attributed to Finch, Robert J..

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Knowledge Transfer and Training in Safeguards for Decommissioned Nuclear Facilities (Project Final Report for FY2022)

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) applies safeguards to nuclear facilities that are not operating, including those undergoing decommissioning, and the IAEA’s effort in this area is both considerable and increasing. Specifically, the IAEA Department of Safeguards’ Division of Concepts and Planning (SGCP-003: Safeguards Approaches) identified an R&D need to “Develop safeguards implementation guidelines for facilities under decommissioning and safeguards concepts for post-accident facilities under decommissioning”. Nuclear facilities undergoing decommissioning are not exempt from safeguards agreements between the IAEA and Host State, and, accordingly, the requirement for verification of no diversion of nuclear material and detection of undeclared activities at decommissioned facilities remain even after facility shutdown. However, the effort required to meet safeguards objectives diminishes as nuclear material and essential equipment are removed during the decommissioning process which shifts the emphasis from verification of ever-diminishing fissile or source material inventories to verification of changes in facility design and equipment operability.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2019

Effective Access Monitoring at Geological Repositories

Access points at a deep, mined geological repository (GR) for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other nuclear wastes present potential diversion paths for nuclear material. Because C/S measures are not likely to be used underground, access to a GR will require unprecedented reliance on C/S measures to maintain continuity of knowledge (CoK) on SNF buried underground. We develop a model GR based on common features of GR designs from national programs in order to develop and optimize C/S measures for GR access points that maximize confidence that CoK is maintained on SNF underground. Critical access points identified in this study are surface entrances to (1) the GR ramp (2) the excavation shaft, (3) the main elevator shaft, and (4) the ventilation shaft. The first three are considered critical detection points (DPs), whereas the fourth is considered a non-critical DP. The reason for the distinction is due to the different design capabilities of shaft components: the first three (ramp, excavation shaft, main elevator) are all capable of being used to move material from the underground to the surface, whereas the ventilation shaft is not. Such capabilities are verified during periodic design information verification (DIV) inspections.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Maintaining Continuity of Knowledge on Nuclear Waste Destined for Geological Repositories. A Case Study of Plutonium Shipments to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)

This study examines methods that can help maximize confidence in maintaining Continuity of Knowledge (CoK) on plutonium-bearing wastes, from a final safeguards-verification measurement through emplacement underground. The study identifies Containment and Surveillance (C/S) measures that can be applied during packaging of plutonium wastes at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina, USA, through shipment to, and receipt and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico, USA. Results of this study could apply to countries with a Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (CSA) that plan to dispose in a geological repository plutonium or other non-fuel nuclear materials that are under international safeguards.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Developing Design Criteria for Safeguards Seals for Spent Fuel Transportation Casks

Current designs for spent fuel transportation casks cannot ensure a cask's integrity during shipment, nor is there any verifiable means of maintaining continuity of knowledge (CoK) on a cask's contents. Spent fuel destined for encapsulation plants or geological repositories requires additional containment and surveillance (C/S) measures during shipment. Following final safeguards accountancy measurements on spent fuel assemblies, the shipment of verified assemblies will require unprecedented reliance on maintaining CoK on the fuel inside transport casks. Such increased reliance is due to the lack of reverification of spent fuel following encapsulation into disposal canisters and by meeting the requirement of dual C/S measures during such fuel shipments according to recommendations made by the Application of Safeguards to Geological Repositories (ASTOR) International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expert group. By designing spent fuel transportation casks with effective seals integrated into their design, CoK can be more effectively maintained than by ad hoc C/S measures because seal integration ensures that a cask has not been tampered with. Externally applied seals might not be able to provide such assurance for currently designed spent fuel transportation casks, although some combination of seals, detectors, and/or a technology that can verify canister integrity might provide this assurance. This paper examines the design criteria for integrating safeguards seals into transportation casks and provides recommendations for near-term applications.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Developing reliable safeguards seals for application verification and removal by State operators

Once a geological repository has begun operations, the encapsulation and disposal of spent fuel will be performed as a continuous, industrial-scale series of processes, during which time safeguards seals will be applied to transportation casks before shipment from an encapsulation plant, and then verified and removed following receipt at the repository. These operations will occur approximately daily during several decades of Sweden's repository operation; however, requiring safeguards inspectors to perform the application, verification, and removal of every seal would be an onerous burden on International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA's) resources. Current IAEA practice includes allowing operators to either apply seals or remove them, but not both, so the daily task of either applying or verifying and removing would still require continuous presence of IAEA inspectors at one site at least. Of special importance is the inability to re-verify cask or canisters from which seals have been removed and the canisters emplaced underground. Successfully designing seals that can be applied, verified and removed by an operator with IAEA approval could impact more than repository shipments, but other applications as well, potentially reducing inspector burdens for a wide range of such duties.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Design Verification for Deep Boreholes. A Scoping Study.

Deep borehole disposal (DBD) has been suggested as an option for disposing spent nuclear fuel in a number of countries, including several countries that are subject to international safeguards. DBD presents some distinct challenges for safeguards compared to a conventional mined geological repository (MGR), including the ability to verify declared design information about the borehole. The ability to verify a borehole's design is crucial for assuring that spent fuel or other accountable nuclear materials are disposed as declared in a borehole of known and verifiable design. This study reviews existing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) borehole inspection tools currently used by the drilling industry, and evaluates the capabilities of those COTS inspection tools against how well they can meet potential needs and requirements of Design Information Verification (DIV) inspections for international safeguards. The study provides recommendations for several promising COTS borehole inspection tools that might be used for DIV safeguards inspections and recommends possible modifications and future testing

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗