Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Eckstein, Jonathan

Publications and source records attributed to Eckstein, Jonathan.

Stochastic projective splitting

Here, we present a new, stochastic variant of the projective splitting (PS) family of algorithms for inclusion problems involving the sum of any finite number of maximal monotone operators. This new variant uses a stochastic oracle to evaluate one of the operators, which is assumed to be Lipschitz continuous, and (deterministic) resolvents to process the remaining operators. Our proposal is the first version of PS with such stochastic capabilities. We envision the primary application being machine learning (ML) problems, with the method’s stochastic features facilitating “mini-batch” sampling of datasets. Since it uses a monotone operator formulation, the method can handle not only Lipschitz-smooth loss minimization, but also min–max and noncooperative game formulations, with better convergence properties than the gradient descent-ascent methods commonly applied in such settings. The proposed method can handle any number of constraints and nonsmooth regularizers via projection and proximal operators. We prove almost-sure convergence of the iterates to a solution and a convergence rate result for the expected residual, and close with numerical experiments on a distributionally robust sparse logistic regression problem.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Projective Hedging Algorithms for Multistage Stochastic Programming, Supporting Distributed and Asynchronous Implementation

Here we propose a decomposition algorithm for multistage stochastic programming that resembles the progressive hedging method of Rockafellar and Wets but is provably capable of several forms of asynchronous operation. We derive the method from a class of projective operator splitting methods fairly recently proposed by Combettes and Eckstein, significantly expanding the known applications of those methods. Our derivation assures convergence for convex problems whose feasible set is compact, subject to some standard regularity conditions and a mild “fairness” condition on subproblem selection. The method’s convergence guarantees are deterministic and do not require randomization, in contrast to other proposed asynchronous variations of progressive hedging. Computational experiments described in an online appendix show the method to outperform progressive hedging on large-scale problems in a highly parallel computing environment.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗