Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Duke, C. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Duke, C. B..

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

The ZnSe(110) puzzle - Comparison with GaAs(110)

The surface structure of monocrystalline ZnSe(110) and of 4-5-nm-thick ZnSe(110) layers epitaxially grown on GaAs(110) is investigated by means of elastic LEED and AES; the results are analyzed using the computer programs and R-factor methods of Duke et al. (1981 and 1983), presented in graphs and tables, and compared to those for GaAs(110). Significant differences are attributed to bond-length-conserving outward rotation of Se and inward rotation of Zn in the top layer, with an angle of 4 deg between the actual plane of the cation-anion chain and the truncated bulk surface. The R intensities measured for ZnSe(110) and GaAs(110) are given as Rx = 0.22 and RI = 0.21 and Rx = 0.24 and RI = 0.16, respectively.

Duke, C. B.↗
NASA NTRS1984

The atomic geometries of GaP(110) and ZnS(110) revisited - A structural ambiguity and its resolution

The atomic geometries of GaP(110) and ZnS(110) are reexamined using the R-factor minimization procedure, developed for GaAs(110) and previously applied to GaSb(110), ZnTe(110), InAs(110), and AlP(110), to analyze experimental elastic low-energy electron diffraction intensities. Unlike most of the earlier cases, both GaP(110) and ZnS(110) exhibit two distinct minimum-Rx structures which cannot be distinguished by analysis of the shapes of the intensity profiles alone. One region of best-fit structures exhibits top-layer displacements normal to the surface characterized by a small bond-length-conserving, top-layer rotation (omega aproximately 2-3 deg), a small relaxation of the top layer away from the surface, and a 10 percent expansion of the top-layer bond length. The other region of best-fit structures is the conventional one: nearly bond-length-conserving rotations of omega = 26-28 deg in the top layer and a small (approximately 0.1 A) contraction of the uppermost layer spacing. This ambiguity may be removed, however, by consideration of the integrated beam intensities. The conventional region of structural parameters provides a decisively better description of the relative magnitudes of the integrated beam intensities and hence is the preferred structure.

Duke, C. B.↗