Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Douglas, B. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas, B. C..

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1972

Mean elements of GEOS-1 and GEOS-2

A combined analytical-numerical procedure for determining precise mean orbital elements is presented and applied to the orbits of GEOS-1 and GEOS-2. The precision of the mean semi-major axes of these orbits is a few tens of centimeters when optical flash data is used to determine two-day orbital arcs. Four-day Minitrack orbits give mean semi-major axes of a few meters precision. The mean orientation parameters are obtained to a precision of about 0.1 sec (about 3m) or better from the optical orbits. This precision is adequate for determinations of tidal parameters, particularly in the case of GEOS-2, where the tidal perturbation of the inclination is 10 sec.

Douglas, B. C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Tracking-station coordinates from Geos 1 and Geos 2 optical flash data.

Center-of-mass coordinates for 28 NASA MOTS and SAO Baker-Nunn camera sites have been obtained from optical flash data from Geos 1 (1965 89A) and Geos 2 (1968 002A). More than 25,000 observations in about 100 two-day arcs were used in dynamical solutions (SAO 1969 AGU gravity model). Comparison of results with local survey solutions and with solutions from deep-space vehicle tracking suggests accuracy of about 2 meters in longitude and height and 5 meters in latitude. The relatively larger error in latitude arose from propagation of gravity-model error largely along the track of these high-inclination satellites. The results have also been compared with the solutions of the SAO 1969 standard earth for station coordinates on the North American datum. The solution obtained in the present work is much closer to the survey results in chord length between stations.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Tests and comparisons of gravity models.

Optical observations of the GEOS satellites were used to obtain orbital solutions with different sets of geopotential coefficients. The solutions were compared before and after modification to high order terms (necessary because of resonance) and were then analyzed by comparing subsequent observations with predicted trajectories. The most important source of error in orbit determination and prediction for the GEOS satellites is the effect of resonance found in most published sets of geopotential coefficients. Modifications to the sets yield greatly improved orbits in most cases. The results of these comparisons suggest that with the best optical tracking systems and gravity models, satellite position error due to gravity model uncertainty can reach 50-100 m during a heavily observed 5-6 day orbital arc. If resonant coefficients are estimated, the uncertainty is reduced considerably.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1971

The relation of the European Datum to a geocentric reference system

Over 31,000 precision reduced optical observations of GEOS-1 and 2 in 70 two-day orbital arcs were used at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in a dynamical solution to determine center-of-mass coordinates for 15 tracking stations on the European Datum. Comparisons with the results obtained at Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) give agreement of about 1.5 ppm for chord lengths. After considering a scale correction to the European Datum (ED) of 1950 to account for the absence of geoid heights at the time of its reduction, agreement to a few ppm between the CNES/GSFC and the ED chords is obtained. However, a small systematic difference between survey and satellite results remains for stations in southeastern France and Switzerland.

Marsh, J. G.↗