Engineering PapersSearch

Engineering topics

Douglas Burns

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas Burns.

Overview of High Temperature Material Needs for Space Nuclear Propulsion Reactors

Space nuclear propulsion systems are capable of enabling future crewed missions to Mars. Two primary options of these systems exist: nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP). NTP systems use a reactor as a heat exchanger to heat a hydrogen propellant to produce high specific impulse (≥ 900 s) and thrust (10 - 100 klbf). A NTP materials challenge is development of nuclear fuel capable of operating for short durations (hours) under high power densities (≥ 5 MW/L) and temperatures (> 2700 K) in a corrosive hydrogen environment. In NEP systems, the reactor heats a working fluid which transfers heat to a power conversion system to power electric thrusters. NEP is capable of higher specific impulse (≥ 2000 s) but limited to low thrust (10s lbf). Light weight vessel and in-core structural materials that are radiation-resistant, creep-resistant, and dimensionally stable while operating at ~1500 K over mission times up to several years are needed for NEP. Both systems can benefit from high temperature neutron moderators. Through the Space Nuclear Propulsion project, NASA, supported by the DOE, is developing NTP and NEP systems. Technology maturation planning and risk reduction activities related to fabrication and testing of reactor material candidates is ongoing. This presentation overviews NTP and NEP materials needs and current ceramic and composite development activities.

nuclear thermal propulsion

Integrated Development Strategy for Space Nuclear Propulsion

An integrated development strategy to realize operational nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) systems is presented. A generational development approach is employed, where each generation of a propulsion system is more capable and reliable than the previous. These systems will either enable missions that were not possible or, for missions that could be performed using other systems (including earlier generations of space nuclear systems) will improve the mission metrics, most notably greater delivered mass, reduced trip time, or longer mission endurance. Present and ongoing investments in materials development, component design and testing, and modeling and simulation lead the way in developing demonstration flight systems and expose gaps in the nation’s capabilities. Developing future generations of systems with greater utility will require additional capabilities, including those for large-scale nuclear test and evaluation.

Kurt Polzin