Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Dean, Jesse D.

Publications and source records attributed to Dean, Jesse D..

Alternative Water Treatment Technologies for Cooling Tower Applications

The current state of water treatment in GSA buildings is to use conventional chemical maintenance for water quality and contract out this specialized service, for a fixed fee, to a third-party company specializing in such service. Traditional water treatment approaches rely on chemicals to extend the ability of the water to hold scaling minerals in suspension and kill off biological growth. This project assesses the effectiveness of three different technologies provided by three different manufacturers. Each system uses some sort of proprietary device, technology, or chemical. This report addresses both water and cost savings associated with Alternative Water Treatment (AWT) technologies, and the water quality provided by the AWT technologies.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Demonstration and Evaluation of an Advanced Oxidation Technology for Cooling Tower Water Treatment

A cooling tower is a heat rejection device that uses an evaporative cooling process to reject heat to the atmosphere from water cooled chilled water plant. Cooling towers are commonly applied to water cooled chilled water plants in large commercial buildings. The Silver Bullet alternative water treatment (AWT) technology is a non-chemical-based cooling tower water treatment technology. It is advertised as a simpler water treatment technology that can reduce cooling tower blowdown by increasing the CoC, which reduces monthly chemical costs, monthly operation and maintenance costs, and the amount of scale that collects on condenser water tubes and cooling towers. The primary focus of this evaluation was measuring cooling tower make up water usage pre- and post- installation of the AWT. In addition, annual reductions in cooling tower chemical costs, monthly water chemistry reports, ease of installation, and overall cost effectiveness were evaluated.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Electrochemical Water Treatment for Cooling Towers

Cooling towers are an integral component of many refrigeration systems, providing comfort or process cooling across a broad range of applications. They are the point in the system where heat is dissipated to the atmosphere through the evaporative cooling process. Cooling towers are commonly found in industrial applications and are also commonly applied to water cooled chilled water plants in medium to large commercial buildings. Cooling towers used in medium to large commercial buildings are the focus of this paper. Cooling towers consume a large amount of water. Cooling tower related water consumption is one of largest potable water loads within buildings in the United States, with over 26% of water use associated with heating and cooling. Reducing water consumption is a priority for the General Services Administration (GSA) due to Executive Order 13514, Energy Policy Act of 1992, and regional water shortage concerns. These factors have brought about the investigation of cost effective opportunities to reduce water use, such as alternative water treatment (AWT) technologies for cooling towers. Traditional water treatment approaches rely on chemicals to extend the ability of the water to hold scaling minerals in suspension, minimize corrosion, and prevent biological growth. This treatment protects the chillers and cooling tower equipment, however even when chemicals are used regularly, a certain percentage of condenser water must be blown down and made up with fresh water to maintain system water quality parameters. In addition, the use of chemicals sometimes creates a waste issue and can cause building owners to incur additional fees such as disposal or sewer charges. The current state of water treatment in GSA buildings is to contract for a fixed fee with a company specializing in a conventional chemical maintenance. There are many vendors of AWT systems. This project assesses the effectiveness of one technology provided by Dynamic Water Technologies (DWT). This project assesses the effectiveness of DWT for lowering GSA operating costs while maintaining proper water treatment. The application of the DWT technology in place of traditional chemical water treatment has the anticipated benefits of: - Saving water and water/sewer costs by reducing the amount of blowdown required due to being able to remove scale causing minerals that allows the system to operate at a higher cycles of concentration - Eliminating the need for water treatment chemicals for scale, corrosion, and biological growth - Increasing chiller efficiency by preventing scaling and removing some of the existing scale, which improves heat transfer - Maintaining very low corrosion rates. The technology was installed at the Juliette Gordon Low Federal Building located in Savannah, Georgia. The building has two cooling towers utilizing traditional chemical water treatment for the cooling water circulating through the two chiller condensers. Measurement at the site includes the flow of makeup water to the cooling towers and the blowdown flow rate from the cooling tower basins. Additionally, energy measurements include the electrical energy from the chillers, chiller water pumps, condenser water pumps, cooling tower fans and the energy used by the DWT skid and slip stream pump.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

High Performance Circulator Pump Demonstration

In commercial buildings, smaller circulator pumps are typically overlooked for energy efficiency upgrades due to their smaller size (typically less than 2.5 hp) and due to the lack of commercially available products that can simultaneously provide a combination of integrated controls and variable speed operation that is required to achieve acceptable energy savings and life cycle cost effectiveness. This General Services Administration (GSA) Green Proving Ground (GPG) project assessed the performance of a new high performance circulator pump (HPCP) at one heating hot water (HHW) application and two domestic hot water (DHW) application at the Denver Federal Center in Denver, Colorado.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

High-Efficiency Housing at the Fort Peck Indian Reservation: Opportunities and Lessons Learned

This project was initiated to provide design assistance in an effort to maximize energy performance for affordable housing at the Fort Peck Indian Reservation near Poplar, Montana. The Make It Right Foundation (MIRF) built 20 high performing homes (LEED Platinum) in 2015 and 2016 with three (3) different design options. NREL and EPA set out to provide energy analysis along with measurement and verification (M and V) of the homes to characterize energy use and provide clarity for future decision making with regard to tribal housing options. The results included herein summarize the energy end uses and documents projected energy impacts from various aspects of the MIRF home designs and construction. This report includes an analysis of energy use in 5 MIRF homes, comparing energy use across the different styles and configurations. Energy models were created for the 2 styles of MIRF homes, including renewable energy assessment for photovoltaic (PV) systems. Existing tribal housing has also been analyzed, with 5 housing units being analyzed for energy use and an energy model being created for 1 housing unit. The findings of this study highlight many of the challenges that arise when attempting to construct high performance housing in a region where such construction practices are still relatively rare. Homes in Poplar are well designed and, for the most part, and include climate specific design considerations appropriate for northeastern Montana. The most significant issues identified in MIRF homes were related to the work done to put the homes on the foundation, insulate the crawlspaces, and do final connection with the utilities. The Taxed II Credit homes are well designed and well suited to northeastern Montana, and with slight modifications to the design and construction could be very efficient. All occupant comfort and energy usage issues that were identified during the site visits can be remedied through retrofit measures that are relatively inexpensive. Energy efficiency opportunities were found that can be implemented in each of the homes. These retrofits are generally inexpensive and have a quick return on investment. While the MIRF houses as well as the Taxed II Credit homes can achieve high levels of energy performance with modest retrofits. Similar houses built in the future could achieve even better performance with minor design changes, and generally low incremental cost. Renewable energy systems are economically feasible in this area, but the payback is on the high side of what would likely be acceptable to homeowners. If the price of solar comes down to $2/watt installed, the systems will achieve a simple payback of 13 years, which is likely a return on investment that is attractive to homeowners. If the homes are made sufficiently tight to be high performance, energy recovery ventilators will be necessary to maintain acceptable indoor air quality. The Taxed II Credit homes are already equipped with heat recovery ventilators (HRVs), and they seem to function well. As PV prices continue to decline, start implementing projects as they become cost effective.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗