Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Daniel, W. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel, W. E..

Demonstration of the Blending of the H-Canyon 2nd U Cycle with Natural U to Produce a HALEU Solution

Continued growth in the demand for high assay low enriched uranium (HALEU) is projected to support the conversion of US high performance research reactors from high to low enrichment and the development and deployment of a new generation of advanced reactors. Current options to meet the growing US need for HALEU include (1) blend-down of excess of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from the nuclear weapons programs, (2) blend-down of HEU metal from other stockpiles, or (3) recycle of irradiated HEU recovered from spent nuclear fuel (SNF). The recycle of HEU from SNF has been performed at the Savannah River Site (SRS) H-Canyon facility for nearly two decades to produce 4.95 wt % U-235 for sale and subsequent use in fuel for Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) reactors. The HALEU produced in H-Canyon will not exceed the U-236 concentration limit in the ASTM C1462 standard for U metal enriched to more than 15% and less than 20% U-235, which applies to advanced reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evaluation of the Dissolution Behavior of L-Bundle End Caps and HFIR Fuel Carriers

The H-Canyon facility is currently using the 6.1D dissolver for the dissolution of Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel and the 6.4D dissolver for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel using mercury-catalyzed HNO₃ dissolution flowsheets. The processing strategy for both dissolvers involves the dissolution of multiple charges of fuel per batch. After the designated heating cycle, the dissolvers are opened, and the charging wells are probed to determine if the MTR or HFIR fuel has dissolved. If undissolved fuel fragments are beyond a certain height, the dissolver must be closed and heated for an additional amount of time to dissolve the remaining material. In recent MTR fuel dissolutions, “high probes” (i.e., excessive undissolved material) were frequently observed, which resulted in extended dissolution times. The suspected cause of the high probes was the incomplete dissolution of the L-Bundle End Cap, rather than the fuel or fuel bundles. The End Cap is hypothesized to be binding in the insert well and not dropping into the acid as the L-Bundle and fuel dissolve. Once the End Cap is dislodged by the probe and drops into the acid, the dissolution rate of the End Cap appears to be significantly reduced compared to the dissolution rate of the fuel and other parts of the L-Bundle. A similar issue has also been observed with the lifting bail on the HFIR fuel carriers. During HFIR fuel dissolutions, the lifting bail on the outer carrier has resulted in high probes due to incomplete dissolution. In one case, a partially dissolved bail was caught in one of the insert well holes which prevented the probe from going to the bottom of the well.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution Flowsheet for U-10Mo Scrap Generated from the Fabrication of High Performance Research Reactor Fuel

The Savannah River National Laboratory was requested to develop dissolution flowsheets for low enriched uranium scrap streams generated during the fabrication of high performance research reactor (HPRR)fuel. The scrap streams include U-10Mo-Zr foil and rejected Al-clad plates. Co-rolled U-10Mo-Zr foils and Alclad U-10Mo-Zr mini-plates which have been through the hot isostatic pressing process were obtained from BWX Technologies, Inc. for use in this work. Small-scale dissolution experiments were performed to identify the flowsheet conditions required to safely and efficiently dissolve the fuel fabrication scrap for subsequent U recovery. Experiments were performed to demonstrate the dissolution of the U-10Mo-Zr foil, removal of the Al cladding from the mini-plates, and the dissolution of the mini-plates following cladding removal.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Demonstration of Chemical Decladding and Disposition Options for Non-Al Clad Fuels in H-Canyon

Aqueous disposition of non-Al clad fuels was studied in order to determine if H-Canyon would be a viable disposition option for this type of L-Basin fuel. A review of the L-Basin fuel types and its condition was done suggesting two major cladding types, Zircaloy and 304L stainless steel needed to be studied. Dissolution flowsheets options were reviewed. Sulfex and Zirflex processes were chosen as best for H-Canyon integration. Both process flowsheets were demonstrated on a lab scale to determine decladding rate, and off-gas and waste production. The resulting data suggested decladding in H-Canyon was an option but dissolver corrosion as well as off-gas and waste generation needed to be addressed. Small scale dissolution in a hot cell of smaller damaged fuel is a viable option with the flowsheets tested.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Optimized Dissolution Flowsheet for Uranium Metal

The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has entered into cooperative agreements with commercial businesses to establish a reliable domestic source of 99 Mo that will be produced without the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution of Material Test Reactor Fuel in an H-Canyon Dissolver

In an amended record of decision for the management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Savannah River Site, the US Department of Energy has authorized the dissolution and recovery of U from 1000 bundles of Al-clad SNF. The SNF is fuel from domestic and foreign research reactors and is typically referred to as Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel. Bundles of MTR fuel containing assemblies fabricated from U-Al alloys (or other U compounds) are currently dissolved using a Hg-catalyzed HNO 3 flowsheet. Since the development of the existing flow sheet, improved experimental methods have been developed to more accurately characterize the offgas composition and generation rate during laboratory dissolutions. Recently, these new techniques were successfully used to develop a flowsheet for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel. Using the data from the HFIR dissolution flowsheet development and necessary laboratory experiments, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to define flowsheet conditions for the dissolution of MTR fuels. With improved offgas characterization techniques, SRNL will be able define the number of bundles of fuel which can be charged to an H-Canyon dissolver with much less conservatism.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Dissolution of Material and Test reactor Fuel in an H-Canyon Dissolver

In an amended record of decision for the management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Savannah River Site, the US Department of Energy has authorized the dissolution and recovery of U from 1000 bundles of Al-clad SNF. The SNF is fuel from domestic and foreign research reactors and is typically referred to as Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel. Bundles of MTR fuel containing assemblies fabricated from U-Al alloys (or other U compounds) are currently dissolved using a Hg-catalyzed HNO3 flowsheet. Since the development of the existing flowsheet, improved experimental methods have been developed to more accurately characterize the offgas composition and generation rate during laboratory dissolutions. Recently, these new techniques were successfully used to develop a flowsheet for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel. Using the data from the HFIR dissolution flowsheet development and necessary laboratory experiments, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to define flowsheet conditions for the dissolution of MTR fuels. With improved offgas characterization techniques, SRNL will be able define the number of bundles of fuel which can be charged to an H-Canyon dissolver with much less conservatism.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution Flowsheet for High Flux Isotope Reactor Fuel

As part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) processing campaign, H-Canyon is planning to begin dissolving High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel in late FY17 or early FY18. Each HFIR fuel core contains inner and outer fuel elements which were fabricated from uranium oxide (U 3 O 8 ) dispersed in a continuous Al phase using traditional powder metallurgy techniques. Fuels fabricated in this manner, like other SNF’s processed in H-Canyon, dissolve by the same general mechanisms with similar gas generation rates and the production of H 2 . The HFIR fuel cores will be dissolved and the recovered U will be down-blended into low-enriched U. HFIR fuel was previously processed in H-Canyon using a unique insert in both the 6.1D and 6.4D dissolvers. Multiple cores will be charged to the same dissolver solution maximizing the concentration of dissolved Al. The objective of this study was to identify flowsheet conditions through literature review and laboratory experimentation to safely and efficiently dissolve the HFIR fuel in H-Canyon. Laboratory-scale experiments were performed to evaluate the dissolution of HFIR fuel using both Al 1100 and Al 6061 T6 alloy coupons. The Al 1100 alloy was considered a representative surrogate which provided an upper bound on the generation of flammable (i.e., H 2 ) gas during the dissolution process. The dissolution of the Al 6061 T6 alloy proceeded at a slower rate than the Al 1100 alloy, and was used to verify that the target Al concentration in solution could be achieved for the selected Hg concentration. Mass spectrometry and Raman spectroscopy were used to provide continuous monitoring of the concentration of H 2 and other permanent gases in the dissolution offgas, allowing the development of H 2 generation rate profiles. The H 2 generation rates were subsequently used to evaluate if a full HFIR core could be dissolved in an H-Canyon dissolver without exceeding 60% of the calculated lower flammability limit (LFL) for H 2 at a given Hg concentration. Complete dissolution of the Al 1100 and Al 6061 T6 alloys up to a final Al concentration of 2 M was obtained using a 7 M HNO 3 solution containing a 0.002 M Hg catalyst. However, following the dissolutions, solids were observed in the solution. The solids were amorphous, but likely originated from the Si present in the alloys. No crystalline materials, such as Al(NO 3 ) 3 were observed. During the course of the dissolution experiments, it was determined that delaying the addition of Hg once the HNO 3 solution reached the boiling point can reduce the total offgas and H 2 generation rates. The delay in starting the Hg addition is not necessary for HFIR fuel dissolution, but could be useful in other research reactor dissolution campaigns. The potential to generate flammable concentrations of H 2 in the offgas during a HFIR fuel dissolution was evaluated using the experimental data. The predicted H 2 concentration in the dissolver offgas stream was compared with 60% of the calculated H 2 LFL at 200 °C using several prototypical experiments. The calculations showed that a full HFIR core can be dissolved using nominally 0.002 M Hg to catalyze the dissolution. The margin between the predicted H 2 concentration and the calculated LFL was greater when the solution was allowed to boil for 45 min prior to initiating the Hg addition. When the Hg was increased to 0.004 M, the predicted H 2 concentration exceeded the calculated LFL early in the dissolution. The dissolution experiments also demonstrated that additional Hg (beyond the initial 0.002 M) could be added as the Al concentration increases. The ability to add more Hg during a HFIR fuel dissolution could be beneficial if slow dissolution rates are observed at high Al concentrations. Experimental data were used to demonstrate that the predicted H 2 concentration in a dissolver was below 60% of the calculated LFL at 200 °C when 0.004 M Hg was used to catalyze the dissolution if the Al concentration is conservatively greater than 0.5 M. Data also show that the Hg concentration during a HFIR fuel dissolution can be increased from 0.002 to 0.008 M at an Al concentration of 1.3 M.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Low temperature dissolution flowsheet for plutonium metal

The H-Canyon flowsheet used to dissolve Pu metal for PuO 2 production utilizes boiling HNO 3 . SRNL was requested to develop a complementary dissolution flowsheet at two reduced temperature ranges. The dissolution and H 2 generation rates of Pu metal were investigated using a dissolving solution at ambient temperature (20-30 °C) and for an intermediate temperature of 50-60 °C. Additionally, the testing included an investigation of the dissolution rates and characterization of the off-gas generated from the ambient temperature dissolution of carbon steel cans and the nylon bags that contain the Pu metal when charged to the dissolver.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Fluidized bed steam reformed mineral waste form performance testing to support Hanford Supplemental Low Activity Waste Immobilization Technology Selection

This report describes the benchscale testing with simulant and radioactive Hanford Tank Blends, mineral product characterization and testing, and monolith testing and characterization. These projects were funded by DOE EM-31 Technology Development & Deployment (TDD) Program Technical Task Plan WP-5.2.1-2010-001 and are entitled “Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer Low-Level Waste Form Qualification”, Inter-Entity Work Order (IEWO) M0SRV00054 with Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) entitled “Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Treatability Studies Using Savannah River Site (SRS) Low Activity Waste and Hanford Low Activity Waste Tank Samples”, and IEWO M0SRV00080, “Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Waste Form Qualification Testing Using SRS Low Activity Waste and Hanford Low Activity Waste Tank Samples”. This was a multi-organizational program that included Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), THOR® Treatment Technologies (TTT), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Office of River Protection (ORP), and Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS). The SRNL testing of the non-radioactive pilot-scale Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer (FBSR) products made by TTT, subsequent SRNL monolith formulation and testing and studies of these products, and SRNL Waste Treatment Plant Secondary Waste (WTP-SW) radioactive campaign were funded by DOE Advanced Remediation Technologies (ART) Phase 2 Project in connection with a Work-For-Others (WFO) between SRNL and TTT.

Jantzen, C. M.↗