Engineering topics

Daniel L Palumbo

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel L Palumbo.

14 records

NASA NTRS2014

TPSAS-NF1676L-19524-DND

Distributed propulsion is being proposed as an approach to achieve greater aircraft efficiency. An added benefit which might be realized with a distributed propulsion configuration is a reduction in radiated sound power. A reduction in radiated sound power could relieve concerns related to an increase in community noise that would accompany the adaptation of a fleet of many small aircraft fielded to meet increased travel demand. However, a reduction in radiated sound power does not necessarily translate into community acceptance of the new noise signature. Some characteristics of distributed propulsion configurations can create aural effects that people would find more annoying even though the sound is at a lower power level. To understand the community response to the new class of noise that a distributed propulsion system would present requires the prediction, synthesis and auralization of the noise in a controlled environment. Representative members of the community can then be exposed to the noise and queried for their reaction. These are the types of tests performed in NASA Langley’s Exterior Effects Room. This report summarizes preliminary results obtained using isolated propeller predictions. The sound pressure level of a single ‘large’ propeller is compared to that of two ‘smaller’ propellers of equivalent total thrust. The aural effects of different implementations of the two propellers are also considered. The different implementations include rotation direction and blade passage frequency separation.

Stephen A Rizzi↗

NASA NTRS2014

TPSAS-NF1676L-19003-DND

Daniel L Palumbo↗

NASA NTRS1998

Optical Sensor/Actuator Locations for Active Structural Acoustic Control

Researchers at NASA Langley Research Center have extensive experience using active structural acoustic control (ASAC) for aircraft interior noise reduction. One aspect of ASAC involves the selection of optimum locations for microphone sensors and force actuators. This paper explains the importance of sensor/actuator selection, reviews optimization techniques, and summarizes experimental and numerical results. Three combinatorial optimization problems are described. Two involve the determination of the number and position of piezoelectric actuators, and the other involves the determination of the number and location of the sensors. For each case, a solution method is suggested, and typical results are examined. The first case, a simplified problem with simulated data, is used to illustrate the method. The second and third cases are more representative of the potential of the method and use measured data. The three case studies and laboratory test results establish the usefulness of the numerical methods.

Piezoelectric actuators↗

NASA NTRS1994

Derivation and experimental verification of clock synchronization theory

The objective of this work is to validate mathematically derived clock synchronization theories and their associated algorithms through experiment. Two theories are considered, the Interactive Convergence Clock Synchronization Algorithm and the Mid-Point Algorithm. Special clock circuitry was designed and built so that several operating conditions and failure modes (including malicious failures) could be tested. Both theories are shown to predict conservative upper bounds (i.e., measured values of clock skew were always less than the theory prediction). Insight gained during experimentation led to alternative derivations of the theories. These new theories accurately predict the clock system's behavior. It is found that a 100% penalty is paid to tolerate worst case failures. It is also shown that under optimal conditions (with minimum error and no failures) the clock skew can be as much as 3 clock ticks. Clock skew grows to 6 clock ticks when failures are present. Finally, it is concluded that one cannot rely solely on test procedures or theoretical analysis to predict worst case conditions. conditions.

INTERACTIVE CONVERGENCE CLOCK↗

NASA NTRS1991

Adaptive artificial neural network for autonomous robot control

The topics are presented in viewgraph form and include: neural network controller for robot arm positioning with visual feedback; initial training of the arm; automatic recovery from cumulative fault scenarios; and error reduction by iterative fine movements.

Michael K Arras↗

NASA NTRS1990

Generation and analysis of large reliability models

An effort has been underway for several years at NASA's Langley Research Center to extend the capability of Markov modeling techniques for reliability analysis to the designers of highly reliable avionic systems. This effort has been focused in the areas of increased model abstraction and increased computational capability. The reliability model generator (RMG), a software tool which uses as input a graphical, object-oriented block diagram of the system, is discussed. RMG uses an automated failure modes-effects analysis algorithm to produce the reliability model from the graphical description. Also considered is the ASSURE software tool, a parallel processing program which uses the ASSIST modeling language and SURE semi-Markov solution technique. An executable failure modes-effects analysis is used by ASSURE. The successful combination of the power of graphical representation, automated model generation, and parallel computation leads to the conclusion that large system architectures can now be analyzed.

Aerospace electronics↗

NASA NTRS1990

The Integrated Airframe/Propulsion Control System Architecture program (IAPSA)

The Integrated Airframe/Propulsion Control System Architecture program (IAPSA) is a two-phase program which was initiated by NASA in the early 80s. The first phase, IAPSA 1, studied different architectural approaches to the problem of integrating engine control systems with airframe control systems in an advanced tactical fighter. One of the conclusions of IAPSA 1 was that the technology to construct a suitable system was available, yet the ability to create these complex computer architectures has outpaced the ability to analyze the resulting system's performance. With this in mind, the second phase of IAPSA approached the same problem with the added constraint that the system be designed for validation. The intent of the design for validation requirement is that validation requirements should be shown to be achievable early in the design process. IAPSA 2 has demonstrated that despite diligent efforts, integrated systems can retain characteristics which are difficult to model and, therefore, difficult to validate.

Daniel L Palumbo↗

NASA NTRS1990

State reduction for semi-Markov reliability models

Semi-Markov processes have proved to be an effective and convenient tool to construct models of systems that achieve reliability by redundancy and reconfiguration. These models are able to depict complex system architectures and to capture the dynamics of fault arrival and system recovery. A disadvantage of this approach is that the models can be extremely large, which poses both a model construction and a computational problem. Techniques are needed to reduce the model size. Because these systems are used in critical applications where failure can be expensive, there must be an analytically derived bound for the error produced by the model reduction technique. Automatic model generation programs have been written to help the reliability analyst produce models of complex systems. Because of the importance of these programs, the model reduction technique needs to be precise and easily implemented. This paper presents a model reduction technique called trimming that can be applied to a popular class of systems. An error bound for the trimming procedure is derived that uses readily available system parameters. The trimming procedure is precisely described and appears easy to implement in a model generation program.

Reduced order systems↗

NASA NTRS1989

Experiences with a prevalidation methodology for designing integrated/propulsion control system architectures

The work described in this paper is supported under NASA contract NAS1-18099, Analysis and Detailed Design of an Integrated Airfame/Propulsion Control System Architecture (IAPSA II). This contract address methodology, analysis and detailed design of integrated control system architectures suitable for high performance aircraft of the 1990's. We have developed methodology, with supporting analytical tools, to provide system designers with the capability to specify candidate architectures and accurately predict their reliability and performance in the early stages of design development. This paper describes experience gained using the prevalidation methodology, including supporting tools.

Propulsion control system↗

NASA NTRS1989

Three approaches to reliability analysis

It is noted that current reliability analysis tools differ not only in their solution techniques, but also in their approach to model abstraction. The analyst must be satisfied with the constraints that are intrinsic to any combination of solution technique and model abstraction. To get a better idea of the nature of these constraints, three reliability analysis tools (HARP, ASSIST/SURE, and CAME) were used to model portions of the Integrated Airframe/Propulsion Control System architecture. When presented with the example problem, all three tools failed to produce correct results. In all cases, either the tool or the model had to be modified. It is suggested that most of the difficulty is rooted in the large model size and long computational times which are characteristic of Markov model solutions.

Mesh networks↗

NASA NTRS1988

Fault tolerant system performance modeling

With the proliferation of complex digital systems on aircraft, the need to accurately predict system performance early in the system design cycle becomes imperative. In the past, system designers have relied on ad hoc methods for evaluating performance issues. This has produced systems that have not always worked as originally intended. To alleviate these design deficiencies, formal methods, with supporting tools, must be adhered to during the system design process. The use of performance modeling tools is becoming widely accepted as a way to address timing considerations of system design. An additional incentive for the use of these tools is that they allow the system architect to analyze system component interactions (i.e., bus contention, contention of functions for a processing site, and system repair activity on application performance). This inherent flexibility can result in an explicit specification of the system architecture. This paper addresses a method that supports performance modeling of fault tolerant systems using a discrete event simulation tool. An additional focus is on lessons learned from analyzing these classes of problems. The methodology and supporting work provide system architects with the capability to specify candidate architectures and accurately predict their performance in the early stages of design, where changes to system design is most cost effective. The work has been supported under NASA contract NAS1-18099. Integrated Airframe Propulsion Control System Architecture (IAPSA II). This contract addresses methodology, analysis, and detailed design of integrated control system architectures suitable for high-performance aircraft of the 1990's.

Discrete event simulation↗

NASA NTRS1988

Reliability Model Generator for fault-tolerant systems

This paper discusses an analysis tool, the Reliability Model Generator, that reasons from structural and functional system design specifications to generate a reliability model for the system under investigation. The resultant model defines a system state space sufficient to characterize the effects of single and multiple component failures. This model may then be examined by the analyst or used as input to an existing reliability evaluation tool, the Semi-Markov Unreliability Range Evaluator (SURE), to compute numeric bounds for system reliability (i.e., safety, mission success, availability, etc.). In defining the input to the Reliability Model Generator, a separation of the component function from structural specification is proposed to allow easy modification for analysis of alternative architectures. A hierarchical system description paradigm promotes multiple abstractions, thereby enabling analysis at all phases of the design process. The work described in this paper has been supported under NASA contract NAS1-10899, Integrated Airframe/Propulsion Control System Architecture (IAPSA II). IAPSA II promotes a system engineering methodology and supporting analytical tools to evaluate flight control architecture configuration alternatives during early phases of the design cycle when the cost and schedule impact of design revisions is minimal. Emphasis is placed on traceability to ensure that the requirements drive the resulting design.

Catherine M McCann↗

NASA NTRS1987

Fault-tolerant clock synchronization validation methodology

A validation method for the synchronization subsystem of a fault-tolerant computer system is presented. The high reliability requirement of flight-crucial systems precludes the use of most traditional validation methods. The method presented utilizes formal design proof to uncover design and coding errors and experimentation to validate the assumptions of the design proof. The experimental method is described and illustrated by validating the clock synchronization system of the Software Implemented Fault Tolerance computer. The design proof of the algorithm includes a theorem that defines the maximum skew between any two nonfaulty clocks in the system in terms of specific system parameters. Most of these parameters are deterministic. One crucial parameter is the upper bound on the clock read error, which is stochastic. The probability that this upper bound is exceeded is calculated from data obtained by the measurement of system parameters. This probability is then included in a detailed reliability analysis of the system.

Computer systems↗

NASA NTRS1987

Methods for evaluating integrated airframe/propulsion control system architectures

Methodology, analysis, and detailed design of integrated control system architectures suitable for high-performance aircraft of the 1990s are presented. A methodology, with supporting analytical tools, has been developed to provide system designers with the capability to specify candidate architectures and accurately predict their reliability and performance in the early stages of design development. The authors address the methodology and supporting tools.

Gerald C Cohen↗