Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Dahowski, Robert T.

Publications and source records attributed to Dahowski, Robert T..

Characterizing Plug Load Energy Use and Savings Potential in Army Buildings

The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and Environment) tasked the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to examine plug loads in typical Army buildings. Plug loads (also known as miscellaneous electric loads (MELs)) represent the electricity used by appliances and devices that are plugged in or hardwired and serve functions outside of a building’s core end uses. Common plug loads include computers, printers, copiers, networking devices, refrigerators, and vending machines. They also include personal electronic devices such as televisions, smart phones, tablets, and gaming systems. Examples of hardwired MELs include elevators, air compressors, and fire and security systems. The findings from this study confirm that significant energy is consumed within Army buildings by plug load devices and hardwired MEL equipment. A number of opportunities are identified for reducing unnecessary energy use that could save the Army over $5 million per year when broadly applied. Army regulations clearly spell out expectations for the purchase and operation of information technology equipment (computers, laptops, monitors, printers, and multi-function devices). However, the policies regarding the shutdown or activation of sleep and other lower power modes after 30 minutes of inactivity (15 minutes for monitors) do not appear to be consistently followed. There are many effective approaches and pathways for impacting change as it relates to improving awareness, implementing measures, and adjusting behaviors to identify and reduce plug load energy use. The Army should prioritize and consider deploying all of these to better understand and manage plug load equipment to save energy and enhance resilience across their facilities. Engaging the building occupants who use these devices daily via outreach and education should be a strong component of the strategy. The focus should be on reducing waste without sacrificing productivity or the benefits that many of these devices provide. Continued evaluation of plug loads beyond that performed here is important to gather lessons from additional building and equipment types, and to stay aware of evolving device technology and management options. This will highlight additional needs for policies, best practices, control technologies, and education of personnel to achieve real reductions in energy waste from plug load equipment. It is recommended that this study may serve as the foundation for a broader and sustained focus on plug loads and MELs, towards simultaneously enhancing the productivity, readiness, and resilience of the Army while reducing energy use and demand, and freeing up resources to better support the mission.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Managing Army Plug Load Equipment Energy Use: Workstation Computing Systems

Improvements in computing system security updates and purchasing policies could save the Army as much as 85 million kWh and $5 million per year when applied to the Army’s more than one million computers. This represents the largest and highest-priority plug load energy-and cost-saving measure identified by a recent study focused on Army buildings.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Managing Army Plug Load Equipment Energy Use: Vending Machines

Vending machines consume the most energy of individual plug load devices common to Army buildings. As a group, they rank fourth in total electricity consumption, behind only clothes dryers, laptop computers, and telecom loads. Upgrading 80% of the estimated 22,000 refrigerated vending machines on Army installations to the latest ENERGY STAR ® performance and optimizing their efficiency settings could save 31 million kWh and $2 million per year.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Managing Army Plug Load Equipment Energy Use: Breakroom Appliances

Breakroom equipment is the third highest energy-consuming plug load category in Army buildings. In addition to the vending machine measures described separately, improved purchasing and control measures for breakroom appliances can save the Army more than 9 million kWh and $550K per year in the building types evaluated.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Managing Army Plug Load Equipment Energy Use: Office Equipment

Office equipment covers a large and diverse group of plug load devices. Policies focused on equipment purchase, power management, and usage limitations can save the Army more than 10 million kWh and $620K per year within just four building categories. This represents a top opportunity for energy- and cost-savings identified by a recent Army plug load study.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Study Highlights: Characterizing Plug Load Energy Use and Savings Potential in Army Buildings

A recent study of plug load devices in Army buildings has identified opportunities to save over 83 million kWh of electricity valued at over $5 million per year. These savings may be conservative and were identified by inventorying and monitoring plug load and miscellaneous electric load (MEL) equipment within representative Army buildings. The objective was to better understand the energy consumed by these devices and identify approaches for reducing it while enhancing resilience. This summary highlights the findings, lessons learned, and recommendations identified by the study.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

EVALUATING FACILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RESILIENCE OPPORTUNITIES WITH FEDS AND MCOR

Energy resilience has become increasingly important for critical building infrastructure, in response to concerns over potential disruptions to the electrical grid from threats both natural and man-made. Energy efficiency can provide a valuable resource for reducing critical loads and therefore lowering the cost of supplying alternative power. This paper highlights two tools that are well-suited for analyzing building energy efficiency and resilience opportunities and presents a case study for their combined application. The Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) and Microgrid Component Optimization for Resilience (MCOR) tools can be used together to simulate building systems, identify energy efficiency measures, and evaluate resilience options for powering a site during an outage.

FEDS, MCOR, Energy Efficiency, Resilience, Simulat↗