Cwiok, Kevin | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2022

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Reference Standard for Additive Manufacturing Quality Control

Many additive manufacturing (AM) reference standards for build quality verification concentrate primarily on external features. In contrast, EPRI proposes a pair of AM reference blocks that feature only internal and embedded forms. This report presents, collates, and discusses quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) results from various techniques, including visual testing (VT), radiographic testing (RT), conventional ultrasonic testing (UT), and full matrix capture/total focusing method (FMC/TFM) scanning. The blocks are intended, as part of a larger series of blocks, to evaluate build quality and the relative performance of different NDE techniques in detecting various features. The limits of detectability and the closeness of the as-built shape to the intended form for certain features are quantified, facilitating direct comparison. Upon analysis of the results of this testing, it was found that FMC/TFM was consistently superior in detection, followed by conventional UT, then VT, and lastly RT.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) and Computed Tomography (CT) Comparative Scanning of Proposed Additive Manufacturing Reference Standard

This report presents qualitative results of ultrasonic full matrix capture/total focusing method (FMC/TFM) scanning of two series of blocks, additively manufactured by powder bed fusion, containing a variety of internal features and structures that would not be achievable by conventional manufacturing techniques. The purpose of the first series of additively manufactured (AM) blocks was to explore the possibility of building calibration blocks for FMC/TFM ultrasonic testing (UT). It was confirmed that AM is a suitable candidate for generation of unusual and novel reflector forms, such as rotating slots, purposely embedded voids, and tapering holes, and that FMC/TFM was very capable of characterizing them. The intended use of the second series of AM blocks was as UT reference blocks to characterize the AM process quality or the interrogating UT technique. The larger block in this series was scanned from multiple faces, using multiple UT methods (conventional UT and FMC/TFM) and X-ray computed tomography for comparative purposes. The performance of each method was quantified by a metric corresponding to the detection limit of each feature, and the quantitative results are discussed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗