Cuevas, Andres | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2021

Investigation of Gallium–Boron Spin-On Codoping for poly-Si/SiO x Passivating Contacts

A doping technique for p-type poly-Si/SiOx passivating contacts using a spin-on method for different mixtures of Ga and B glass solutions is presented. Effects of solution mixing ratios on the contact performance (implied open circuit voltage iV oc , contact resistivity ..rho..c) are investigated. For all as-annealed samples at different drive-in temperatures, increasing the percentage of Ga in the solution shows a decrement in iV oc (from ~680 to ~610 mV) and increment in ..rho..c (from ~3 to ~800 mO cm 2 ). After a hydrogenation treatment by depositing a SiN x /AlO x stack followed by forming gas annealing, all samples show improved iVoc (~700 mV with Ga-B co-doped, and ~720 mV with all Ga). Interestingly, when co-doping Ga with B, even a small amount of B in the mixing solution shows negative effects on the surface passivation. Active and total dopant profiles obtained by electrical capacitance voltage and secondary-ion mass spectrometry measurements, respectively, reveal a relatively low percentage of electrically-active Ga and B in the poly-Si and Si layers. Overall, these results help understand the different features of the two dopants: a low ρ c with B, a good passivation with Ga, their degree of activation inside the poly-Si and Si layers, and the annealing effects.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2021

Morphology, microstructure, and doping behaviour: A comparison between different deposition methods for poly-Si/SiO x passivating contacts

In this work, we study how crystallographic structures, optoelectronic properties, and nanoscale surface morphologies of ex situ phosphorus-doped polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si)/SiO x passivating contacts, formed by different deposition methods (sputtering, plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition [PECVD], and low-pressure chemical vapour deposition [LPCVD]), are investigated and compared. Across all these deposition technologies, we noted the same trend: higher diffusion temperatures yield films that are more crystalline but that have rougher surface morphologies due to bigger surface crystal grains. Also, the recrystallization process of the as-deposited Si films starts from the SiO x interface, rather than from the film surface and bulk. However, there are some distinct differences among these technologies. First, the LPCVD method yields the lowest deposition rate, roughest surfaces, and smallest degree of crystallinity on finished poly-Si films. In contrast, the PECVD method has the highest deposition rate and smoothest surfaces for both as-deposited Si and annealed poly-Si films. Second, as-deposited sputtered and PECVD Si films contain only an amorphous phase, whereas as-deposited LPCVD films already has some crystalline phase. Third, the LPCVD phosphorus in-diffusion into the substrate depends strongly on the initial film thickness, whereas for the other two methods, it is weakly dependent on thickness. Finally, the passivation quality of every poly-Si film type has different responses to the film thickness and diffusion temperature, suggesting that the ex situ doping optimization should be performed independently.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗