Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cramer, Ethan Savoy

Publications and source records attributed to Cramer, Ethan Savoy.

LANL Test Engineering’s Structural Dynamics Research and Development Efforts [Slides]

LANL's priority roles are serving as a nuclear weapons design agency and a nuclear weapons production agency; addressing nuclear threats; and performing national security science, technology, and engineering. LANL’s Test Engineering organization serves the national mission of maintaining a strategic nuclear deterrent by providing high-quality, empirical evidence through the execution and assessment of weapons system and component testing. Shock and vibration environmental testing provides one key piece of evidence for evaluation and qualification of these systems and components in the service environments incurred during a lifetime in the stockpile. LANL’s Test Engineering group continuously pursues research and development in structural dynamics to improve shock and vibration testing capabilities, processes, and analysis techniques to increase the fidelity of service environment recreations in laboratory testing settings. This talk will highlight several ongoing projects to represent these R&D efforts.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Rapid, Approximate Multi-Axis Vibration Testing [Slides]

Sequential single-axis testing provides a poor approximation of service environments. Multi-axis vibration tests are not yet standard practice. How good do multi-axis tests need to be to replace single-axis testing in practice? Is the simplest possible multi-axis test close to single-axis testing in test quality? Can single-axis testing techniques provide a sufficient rapid approximation to a multi-axis test? How much can we improve multi-axis test quality by optimizing passive test fixture hardware instead of adding active excitation sources?

42 ENGINEERING↗

A simulation study of test fixture attachment points for vibration test optimization (MEEN 5440 Final Project)

The aerospace industry uses vibration shaker tables to perform component durability testing. These dynamic environments tests often have a hard time replicating the service environment of a component due to a mismatch in the applied force or the boundary condition. Figure 1 shows the desired outcome of a dynamic environments test. The measured responses in a lab test, ideally, should match the measured response of the service environment field test. One way to address the mismatch between field environment and lab environment is with test fixture design. The test fixture attaches the component under test to the shaker table. Single-axis shakers are the industry standard type of shaker table, and, therefore, test fixtures are often rigid in order to minimize cross-axis responses.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Rapid, Approximate Multi-Axis Vibration Testing [Thesis]

The aerospace industry uses vibration shaker tables to perform component durability testing. In these tests a component, piece of equipment, or entire system is attached to a shaker table where it is subjected to dynamic excitation. The goal is to understand how the article under test will perform in its service environment without having to run it through its entire service life via field testing. In a vibration test, an aerospace system or component is qualified if it is shown to survive a test meant to replicate its lifetime service conditions. The test is designed based on recorded field data. To develop a test, a system is taken through all of its intended environments, e.g., transportation, launch, and reentry. Acceleration data measured from these environments is then brought back to the lab and imported into a shaker table controller. The controller then drives a vibration test intended to mimic the acceleration conditions experienced by the system or specific components of the system in the field. However, it is often difficult to match the measured field response in a lab test. This is largely due to the test’s boundary conditions and excitation methods. In a lab test, a shaker table is the excitation source. The two most common shaker table types, differentiated by their number of independent degrees of freedom, are single-axis and multi-axis shaker tables. Multi-axis shakers have the ability to reproduce service environments more realistically, as real accelerations inevitably produce multiple degrees of freedom of excitation simultaneously. Figure 1 depicts a generic multi-axis testing setup on a three-axis shaker table. Often multi-axis tests use six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) shaker tables. Yet multi-axis shakers are not yet common in the aerospace industry due in part to their high cost and the difficulty for shaker controllers to handle the added complexity. Single-axis shaker tables are much more common. They are not as expensive to purchase and have a wide range of control software options.

42 ENGINEERING↗