Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Craig Daughtry

Publications and source records attributed to Craig Daughtry.

Scaling photosynthetic function and CO2 dynamics from leaf to canopy level for maize – dataset combining diurnal and seasonal measurements of vegetation fluorescence, reflectance and vegetation indices with canopy gross ecosystem productivity

Recent advances in leaf fluorescence measurements and canopy proximal remote sensing currently enable the non-destructive collection of rich diurnal and seasonal time series, which are required for monitoring vegetation function at the temporal and spatial scales relevant to the natural dynamics of photosynthesis. Remote sensing assessments of vegetation function have traditionally used actively excited foliar chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, canopy optical reflectance data and vegetation indices (VIs), and only recently passive solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) measurements. In general, reflectance data are more sensitive to the seasonal variations in canopy chlorophyll content and foliar biomass, while fluorescence observations more closely relate to the dynamic changes in plant photosynthetic function. With this dataset we link leaf level actively excited chlorophyll fluorescence, canopy proximal reflectance and SIF, with eddy covariance measurements of gross ecosystem productivity (GEP). The dataset was collected during the 2017 growing season on maize, using three automated systems (i.e., Monitoring Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation fluorimeter, Moni-PAM; Fluorescence Box, FloX; and from eddy covariance tower). The data were quality checked, filtered and collated to a common 30 minutes timestep. We derived vegetation indices related to canopy functioning (e.g., Photochemical Reflectance Index, PRI; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI; Chlorophyll Red-edge, Clre) to investigate how SIF and VIs can be coupled for monitoring vegetation photosynthesis. The raw datasets and the filtered and collated data are provided to enable new processing and analyses.

Petya Campbell↗

REFLECTANCE PRI DOES NOT EQUAL TRANSMITTANCE PRI

Starting from leaf reflectance and transmittance measurements, we calculated two substantially different values of the Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) for each of 22 corn leaves having leaf chlorophyll concentrations ranging from high to low. Leaf reflectance and transmittance were measured simultaneously, precluding changes in leaf light use efficiency (LEU) between measurements. We propose the proportion of leaves reflecting v. transmitting direct beam sunlight toward a canopy reflectance sensor is a potential source of variability in estimates of canopy bidirectional PRI.

Reflectance↗