Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cox, James V.

Publications and source records attributed to Cox, James V..

Solid Mechanics Code Verification: Contrasting Classical and Manufactured Reference Solutions

Verification results for Sierra/SM using inexact reference solutions have often exhibited unsatisfactory convergence behavior. With an understanding of the convergence behavior for these types of tests, one can avoid falsely attributing pathologies of the test with incorrectness of the code. Simple theoretical results highlight that for an inexact reference solution two conditions must be met to observe asymptotic convergence. These conditions, and the resulting types of convergence behaviors, are further illustrated with graphical examples depicting the exact, inexact reference, and sequence of numerical solutions as vectors (in a function space). A stress concentration problem is adopted to contrast convergence behaviors when using inexact (classical linear elastic) and exact (manufactured) reference solutions. Convergence is not initially attained with the classical solution. Convergence with the manufactured solution indicates the convergence failure with the classical reference did not result from code error and provides insight on how for this problem asymptotic convergence could be attained with the classical reference solution by modifying the computational models.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Manufactured Solutions for Solid Mechanics Code Verification -- Hyperelastic Material Case

Increased emphasis on computational simulation for NW qualification merits a corresponding increased diligence in verifying our codes. A manufactured solution process (implemented in Mathematica) for finite deformation, hyperelastic problems is presented that has been used to verify Sierra/SM for this class of problems. The process "manufactures a problem" given either a displacement field or motion map. Four test problems are examined; two provide sanity checks on symbolically calculated results, and two provide code verification results. While simple solutions from linear elasticity can be used to "seed" a manufactured solution, one from beam theory is shown to yield a n unexpectedly complex boundary value problem. The last problem combines two approaches that can significantly simplify the solution of some hypoelasticity problems, which require integration over time; a semi-manufactured approach is proposed and examined that yields the same observed rates of convergence as the classical approach at significantly reduced analytical effort.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Hierarchical multiscale method development for peridynamics

A method is described for applying a sequence of peridynamic models with different length scales concurrently to subregions of a body. The method allows the smallest length scale, and therefore greatest spatial resolution, to be focused on evolving defects such as cracks. The peridynamic horizon in each of the models is half of that of the next model in the sequence. The boundary conditions on each model are provided by the solution predicted by the model above it. Material property characterization for each model is derived by coarse-graining the more detailed resolution in the model below it. Implementation of the multiscale method in the PDMS code is described. Examples of crack growth modeling illustrate the ability of the method to reproduce the main features of crack growth seen in a model with uniformly small resolution. Comparison of the multiscale model results with XFEM and cohesive elements is also given for a crack growth problem.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗