Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Clement Albinet.
This Joint Earth Observation Mission Quality Assessment Framework – SAR Guidelines document is created for the benefit of the Earthnet Data Assessment Project (EDAP) project and Commercial SmallSat Data Acquisition (CSDA) Program as part of a collaboration between ESA and NASA.
Abstract:Digital elevation models (DEMs) provide fundamental depictions of the three-dimensionalshape of the Earth’s surface and are useful to a wide range of disciplines. Ideally, DEMs record theinterface between the atmosphere and the lithosphere using a discrete two-dimensional grid, withcomplexities introduced by the intervening hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.The treatment of DEM surfaces, affected by these intervening spheres, depends on their intendeduse, and the characteristics of the sensors that were used to create them. DEM is a general term,and more specific terms such as digital surface model (DSM) or digital terrain model (DTM) recordthe treatment of the intermediate surfaces. Several global DEMs generated with optical (visible andnear-infrared) sensors and synthetic aperture radar (SAR), as well as single/multi-beam sonars andproducts of satellite altimetry, share the common characteristic of a georectified, gridded storagestructure. Nevertheless, not all DEMs share the same vertical datum, not all use the same conventionfor the area on the ground represented by each pixel in the DEM, and some of them have variable dataspacings depending on the latitude. This paper highlights the importance of knowing, understandingand reflecting on the sensor and DEM characteristics and consolidates terminology and definitions ofkey concepts to facilitate a common understanding among the growing community of DEM users,who do not necessarily share the same background
Presented is a new quality assurance (QA) framework for Earth Observation missions that has been developed as a joint initiative between ESA and NASA. It aims ensure the rigorous assessment of all aspects of relevant aspects of mission quality, verifying claimed mission performance and, where applicable, reviewing the extent to which the mission follows community best practice in a manner that is “fit for purpose”. The QA framework has potential for more general use in both institutional and commercial Earth Observation – helping mission providers to understand the information their users' needs and empowering users to make informed decisions about which data is fit for their purpose.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.