Aircraft Certification by Analysis (CbA): 20-year Vision for Virtual Flight Testing
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Certification by analysis↗
Engineering topics
Christopher L Rumsey
Publications and source records attributed to Christopher L Rumsey.
Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jet Cases for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource
This paper will describe three new supersonic jet cases for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR). These cases were taken from the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test problem, which utilized data taken at NASA GRC consisting of non-intrusive measurements of jet plume velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. The three jet cases all used a Mach 1.63 axisymmetric nozzle: A heated jet for each at on-design conditions, a temperature-matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions are obtained using three established Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) codes: Wind-US, FUN3D, and Vulcan, all using the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model. The NASA TMR requires at least two CFD codes yielding essentially identical results to certify that the approaches are verified, that is - providing solutions that may not necessarily provide close comparisons with experimental data, but solve the posed CFD equations as intended.
nozzle↗
High-Lift Prediction Workshops: Retrospective, Lessons Learned, and Future Prospects
A series of workshops focused on high lift, ongoing since 2010, is discussed. The series goal is to improve computational fluid dynamics prediction of high-lift flowfields, which has historically been very unreliable. The workshops center on CFD verification and validation exercises addressed in common by experts from organizations around the world, thereby enabling more rapid learning and improvement than would be possible with independent research alone. The workshop goals and structure are described, lessons learned to date are summarized, and potential future prospects for high-lift prediction are given.
high lift↗
Large-Scale Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Aerospace Configurations on the Frontier Exascale System
Over the past fifteen years, the high performance computing landscape has undergone a seismic shift in both hardware and software paradigms, which has been necessary to realize a 1000× leap in computational performance while meeting stringent constraints on power consumption. A historical overview of a long-term research effort aimed at addressing these challenges within the context of a commonly-used aerospace computational fluid dynamics (CFD) application is presented. Details of the current implementation as they relate to the new era of exascale-relevant hardware architectures and programming models are described. Two large-scale simulations of aerospace configurations are performed using the entire Frontier exascale system, currently ranked as the most powerful supercomputing system in the world. The effort serves to address a 2024 milestone posed a decade ago by the seminal CFD Vision 2030 Study.
Eric J Nielsen↗
Evaluation of Wall-Modeled Les for Flow Over A Multi-Element Airfoil
We perform wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a 30P30N multielement airfoil at various angles of attack to assess its ability to accurately predict lift using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology. The flow conditions are based on the experiments reported in Klausmeyer & Lin [NASA /TM-112858]. The oncoming flow Mach number is 0.2, and the stowed chord-based Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝑐) is 9 million. The angle of attack (𝛼) is varied between 8◦ and 23◦ with the expected stall angle of around 21◦. The simulated geometry is periodic in the span, thus any three-dimensional effects present in the experiment are ignored. We first analyze the predictions with baseline isotropic and anisotropic grids containing over 16 grid points per boundary-layer thickness. The near-wall streamwise/nominal spacing ratio is 0.4 at the leading/trailing edges of the slat, main element and flap, and 1 elsewhere, and the first wall-normal/nominal spacing ratio is 0.375 over most of the airfoil for the anisotropic grid, while these are unity for the isotropic grid. It is found that the predicted lift and wall pressures, near-wall velocity profiles, and the location of onset of resolved turbulence are sensitive to the near-wall grid anisotropy. Further sensitivities were explored at lower angles of attack by independently varying the streamwise and wall-normal grid anisotropies. The effects of both off-wall and near-wall grid refinement were also quantified. For the grid resolutions used here, our results suggest that the first wall-normal spacing, which coincides with the WMLES exchange location, has a dominant effect on the predictions for this flow configuration.
Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jet Cases for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource
Three new supersonic jet cases were built for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR). These cases were taken from the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test problem, which utilized data taken at NASA GRC consisting of non-intrusive measurements of jet plume velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. The three jet cases all used a Mach 1.63 axisymmetric nozzle: a heated jet for each at on-design conditions, a temperature-matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions are obtained using three established Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) codes: Wind-US, FUN3D, and VULCAN-CFD, all using the Menter Shear Stress Transport k- turbulence model with vorticity source term (SST-V). The NASA TMR requires at least two CFD codes yielding essentially identical results to certify that the approaches are verified, meaning that they solve the posed CFD equations as intended. The three codes generally provided very close agreement with each other for jet plume quantities, with the only exception being static temperature. This discrepancy was determined to be the result of whether or not turbulent kinetic energy was considered in the definition of total energy. Validation of the SST-V turbulence model for this case (its level of agreement/disagreement with experimental data) is also addressed.
turbulance↗
High-Lift Prediction Workshop 5: Summary of Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Technology Focus Group Summary
The fifth High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-5), which involved the high-lift version of the NASA common research model in several configurations, assessed various computational fluid dynamics methods, including Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and hybrid large-eddy simulations. This paper summarizes RANS solutions computed on fixed grids. Case 1, a verification case, considered a simple wing-body configuration and focused on grid convergence of lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients. Case 2 is a configuration buildup case that focused on predicting the effects of increasing geometric complexity. For buildup configurations with slats, flaps, and a nacelle/pylon (configurations 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4), wind-tunnel data were provided by ONERA. Case 3 focused on the reference landing configuration at four Reynolds-number conditions. For Case 1, grid-converged RANS solutions were achieved using the standard Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model and the SA model with a quadratic constitutive relation and a rotation correction. Agreement between RANS solutions was observed for the simplest configuration 2.1 of Case 2 with the standard SA model. For other configurations, agreement between RANS solutions was hampered by insufficient iterative and grid convergence, especially at high angles of attack. In comparison with the experiment, RANS solutions qualitatively showed the correct configuration buildup trend but underpredicted lift and overpredicted both drag and pitching moment at high angles of attack.
Boris Diskin↗
Validation Experiments for Turbulent Separation over an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution
Historically, the flow physics involved with most turbulent separated flows have presented fundamental challenges to validating numerical approaches. As recognized by the CFD Vision 2030 study commissioned by NASA, validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and other scale-resolving methods for turbulent separated flow requires data from advanced, high-fidelity experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. In accordance with this effort, a new test platform, referred to as the NASA Axisymmetric Afterbody, was designed to obtain detailed measurements of the flow field undergoing a smooth, adverse pressure gradient induced separation for a fixed Reynolds number, Re = 180,000. The parametric body offers a range of flow states progressing from fully attached, to incipient separation, and finally to small-scale separated flow based on variable afterbody geometries. In an initial effort to evaluate RANS turbulence model capabilities, the present configurations of the axisymmetric model host a mild adverse pressure gradient over the contoured boattail section, inducing incipient turbulent separation, as well as a slightly larger adverse pressure gradient, inducing a small-scale region of turbulent separation. Experiments include steady pressure measurements and 2-D PIV to provide the preliminary dataset for simulation studies, which examine the effect of variable grid domains and RANS turbulence models. This is done in an effort to understand and evaluate the critical variability between solutions for the present model configurations. Results indicate potential discrepancies may be due to the effect of the square tunnel test section walls, relatively large blockage ratio, and slight variability in reference parameters. Ongoing work will focus on higher fidelity experimental campaigns to obtain surface flow visualizations and Stereo-Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) to deliver higher spatial resolution of the three-dimensional flow field to aid turbulence modelers.
Validation↗