Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Christopher Bermudez

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher Bermudez.

Microgreens Root Zone/Shoot Zone Partitioned Planting Box

To enable sustainable food production in future human exploration missions, plant growth is being studied by the Space Crop Production Team at KSC. Microgreens are good candidates for food supplements and contain specific nutrients that are lacking in the prepackaged diet, including vitamin C and vitamin K. Because they are densely sown, typical growth methods do not allow the ability to distinguish between the levels of evaporation from the rooting substrate and transpiration from the leaves. With larger plants, the root and shoot zone can be separated to distinguish these fluxes and accurate transpiration measurements of plant canopies are feasible. Furthermore, separation of the root and shoot zone may also be beneficial when harvesting microgreens in microgravity as it may reduce microbial contamination of the edible biomass by the roots, which have high microbial loads. Using a root and shoot separator box when harvesting may help with microbial contamination, but these tiny plants are challenging to handle in microgravity, so harvest management remains an open question. The innovation proposed here is a microgreen root/shoot partitioned planting box, which offers a solution to these challenges with accurate gas exchange measurements and a safe microgreen harvest in low gravity environments. Being able to measure transpiration of a microgreen canopy will be important for modeling plant growth in reduced gravity environments, so the first objective was to develop a planting unit with a seal between the root zone and the shoot zone. With an unsuitable harvesting technique, freshly harvested microgreens may add debris to the cabin, so the second objective was to test different harvesting techniques and management approaches associated with this innovation. These two objectives were pursued in parallel since many goals were the same: develop a planting unit that 1) separates the shoots from the roots, 2) allows acceptable germination rate, and 3) allows for seedlings to emerge and develop. What differed was the need to have a seal, which was only applicable for our gas exchange goal, and the need to have an embedded harvesting mechanism and bagging method which only applied to our harvesting goal. Testing of the various harvesting mechanisms and bagging methods was performed during a series of parabolic flights. All parabolic flight procedures took place inside a rented secondary containment chamber (e.g., glovebox) that was developed by the University of Louisville specifically for experiments involving fluids and other materials that may become airborne during reduced gravity flight. Three different harvesting methods and two different bagging collection methods were tested for microgreens. A third bagging method was initially tested but found to be unsuitable. Human factors were also taken into consideration, to identify which harvest and bagging collection methods would be easiest to use with favorable results in microgravity. Three parabolic flight tests were performed in total, one in November 2021 and two in December 2021.

Gioia Massa↗

Parabolic Flight Short

A short video highlighting KSC parabolic flight experiments on microgreens harvesting and collection conducted in Fall 2021.

Christopher Bermudez↗

Documentarian’s Support Role: Recording Active Research for Outreach

The Space Crop Production Team at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center recently conducted a campaign of parabolic flights to study the best techniques for harvesting and collecting microgreens in microgravity. During this process, the research team invited a student with scientific training to the field sites, contributing as the documentarian and aiding in recording audio visual data. The documentarian was tasked with photographing and filming the preparation of experiments for parabolic flight, hardware installation in the parabolic flight plane, the crew performing their experiments, and the harvesting hardware and samples post-flight. Through having a documentarian on the team during experiments, the processes of problem-solving, teamwork, and data collection were able to be captured. This allows for these methods to be reflected upon post-experiment as a means of improving the procedures for the future. Additionally, the picture and video evidence became data that were analyzed following the flight test. The Space Crop Production team benefited by having a documentarian present, as they were able to develop a 45 second social media video with the intent of being published through official NASA outlets. Longer videos for classroom use are also in work. In addition to outreach usage, the collection of footage and visual data the documentarian provides has the potential to be scientifically published both in video-based scientific journals, and as supplemental data in online journal publications. Capturing research in this manner helps share an unseen side of the research practices with a larger audience and increases the potential for scientific engagement and activation.

Christopher Bermudez↗

Harvesting Microgreens in Microgravity: Analysis of Six Different Methods

In long duration space missions, crops will be used to supplement the astronaut diet. One such proposed crop type is microgreens, the young seedlings of edible plants that are known for their high nutritional levels, intense flavors, colorful appearance, and variety of textures. While these characteristics make microgreens a great candidate for space crop production, their small size presents a unique challenge within the microgravity environment. To ensure that astronauts will be able to harvest microgreens in microgravity with ease while avoiding the introduction of debris to the spacecraft cabin, multiple harvesting methods were developed by the Space Crop Production Team at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Three parabolic flights were conducted in November and December of 2021 and during those flights three different microgreen cutting methods (guillotine, pepper grinder, scissors) as well as two different bagging methods (attached and manual) were tested. In each flight, the microgreens were contained inside of a glovebox and footage of all the microgreen harvests was recorded. The cutting and bagging method combination that introduced the lowest average number of particulates into the glovebox was the scissors with attached bagging, closely followed by the pepper grinder with attached bagging. However, the scissors with attached bagging may had introduced fewer particulates into the glovebox because on average, 27% of the microgreens were never cut using the scissors method, so there were fewer free-floating particulates generated. The cutting and bagging method combination that left the lowest average percentage of microgreens remaining on the hardware post-harvest was the pepper grinder with an attached bag. Future directions include involving microgreen harvests in analog environments and further development of the different microgreen cutting and bagging methods. This research was funded by multiple NASA grants at the Kennedy Space Center.

Haley O Boles↗