Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cheng, H. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Cheng, H. P..

At least 19 records

Spin Decoherence in VOPc@graphene Nanoribbon Complexes

Carbon nanoribbons or nanographene qubit arrays can facilitate quantum-to-quantum transduction between light, charge, and spin, making them an excellent testbed for fundamental science in quantum coherent systems and for the construction of higher-level qubit circuits. Here, in this work, we study spin decoherence due to coupling with a surrounding nuclear spin bath of an electronic molecular spin of a vanadyl phthalocyanine (VOPc) molecule integrated onto an armchair-edged graphene nanoribbon (GNR). Density functional theory (DFT) is used to obtain ground-state atomic configurations. Decay of spin coherence in Hahn echo experiments is then simulated using the cluster correlation expansion method with a spin Hamiltonian involving hyperfine and electric field gradient tensors calculated from DFT. We find that the decoherence time T 2 is anisotropic with respect to magnetic field orientation and determined only by the hydrogen nuclear spins on both VOPc and GNR. Large electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) due to nitrogen and vanadium nuclear spins is present at specific field ranges and can be completely suppressed by tuning the magnetic field. The relation between these field ranges and the hyperfine interactions is analyzed. The effects of interactions with the nuclear quadrupole moments are also studied, validating the applicability and limitations of the spin Hamiltonian when they are disregarded.

Hamiltonians↗

Determination of the Spin and Parity of the Z c ( 3900 )

In this paper, the spin and parity of the Z c (3900) ± state are determined to be J P = 1 + with a statistical significance larger than 7σ over other quantum numbers in a partial wave analysis of the process e + e - → π + π - J/Ψ. We use a data sample of 1.92 fb -1 accumulated at $ \sqrt{s}=4.23 $ and 4.26 GeV with the BESIII experiment. When parametrizing the Z c (3900) ± with a Flatté-like formula, we determine its pole mass M pole = (3881.2±4.2 stat ±52.7 syst ) MeV/c 2 and pole width Γ pole = (51.8± 4.6 stat ± 36.0 syst ) MeV. Finally, we also measure cross sections for the process e + e - → Z c (3900) + π - + c.c. → J/Ψπ + π - and determine an upper limit at the 90% confidence level for the process e + e - → Z c (4020) + π - + c.c. → J/Ψ π + π - .

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Measurement of integrated luminosity and center-of-mass energy of data taken by BESIII at √s = 2.125 GeV*

To study the nature of the state Y (2175), a dedicated data set of e + e – collision data was collected at the center-of-mass energy of 2.125 GeV with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider. By analyzing large-angle Bhabha scattering events, the integrated luminosity of this data set is determined to be 108.49±0.02±0.85 pb –1 , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second one is systematic. In addition, the center-of-mass energy of the data set is determined with radiative dimuon events to be 2126.55±0.03±0.85 MeV, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second one is systematic.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Measurement of higher-order multipole amplitudes in ψ ( 3686 ) → γ χ c 1 , 2 with χ c 1 , 2 → γ J / ψ and search for the transition η c ( 2 S ) → γ J / ψ

Using 106 ×10 6 ψ (3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, we measure multipole amplitudes for the decay ψ (3686) → γχ c1,2 → γγ J/ψ beyond the dominant electric-dipole amplitudes. The normalized magnetic-quadrupole (M2) amplitude for ψ (3686) → γχ c1,2 → γγ J/ψ and the normalized electric-octupole amplitudes for ψ ( 3686 ) → γχ c2 , χ c2 → γJ/ψ are determined. The M2 amplitudes for ψ (3686) → γ χ c1 and χ c1,2 → γ J / ψ are found to differ significantly from zero and are consistent with theoretical predictions. We also obtain the ratios of M2 contributions of ψ ( 3686 ) and J /ψ decays to χ c1,2 , b$1\atop{2}$/ b$2\atop{2}$ = 1.35 ± 0.72 and a$1\atop{2}$/a$2\atop{2}$ = 0.617 ± 0.083 , which agree well with theoretical expectations. By considering the multipole contributions of χ c 1 , 2 , we measure the product branching fractions for the cascade decays ψ ( 3686 ) → γχ c0,1,2 → γγJ/ψ and search for the process η c (2S) → γJ/ψ through ψ ( 3686 ) → γη c (2S). The product branching fraction for ψ (3686) → γχ c0 → γγJ/ψ is 3σ larger than published measurements, while those of ψ (3686) → γχ c1,2 → γγJ/ψ are consistent. In conclusion, no significant signal for the decay ψ ( 3686 ) → γη c (2S) → γγJ/ψ is observed, and the upper limit of the product branching fraction at the 90% confidence level is determined.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Amplitude Analysis of the Decays η ' → π + π - π 0 and η ' → π 0 π 0 π 0

Based on a sample of 1.31 × 10 9 J / ψ events collected with the BESIII detector, an amplitude analysis of the isospin-violating decays η'→ π + π - π 0 and η' → π 0 π 0 π 0 is performed. A significant P-wave contribution from η'→ ρ ± π ∓ is observed for the first time in η' → π + π - π 0 . The branching fraction is determined to be B ( η'→ ρ ± π ∓ ) = ( 7.44 ± 0.60 ± 1.26 ± 1.84 ) × 10 -4 , where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third model dependent. In addition to the nonresonant S -wave component, there is a significant σ meson component. The branching fractions of the combined S -wave components are determined to be B ( η' → π + π - π 0 ) S = ( 37.63 ± 0.77 ± 2.22 ± 4.48 ) × 10 -4 and B ( η' → π 0 π 0 π 0 ) = ( 35.22 ± 0.82 ± 2.54 ) × 10 -4 , respectively. Finally, the latter one is consistent with previous BESIII measurements.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Measurement of the absolute branching fraction of D + → $\bar{K}$ 0 e + ν e via $\bar{K}$ 0 → π 0 π 0

By analyzing 2.93 fb–1 data collected at the center-of-mass energy with the BESIII detector, we measure the absolute branching fraction of the semileptonic decay D+ → $\bar{K}$0 e+νe to be Β(D + → $\bar{K}$ 0 e + ν e ) = (8.59 ± 0.14 ± 0.21)% using $\bar{K}$ 0 → K 0 s → π 0 π 0 , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. Finally, our result is consistent with previous measurements within uncertainties..

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗