Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Carney, Kelly S.

Publications and source records attributed to Carney, Kelly S..

43 records · Page 3

Selection of component modes

Structural dynamic models of complex spacecraft are often assembled from a number of component models. In this paper, three methods for reducing the order of these component models are presented by selecting 'important' fixed interface component modes. These methods are applied to two component structures of the Space Station Freedom: a photovoltaic (PV) array and a solar dynamic collector. The reduced order models of these components retain a small fraction of the number of modes in the original models while accurately representing a set of outputs chosen by the user.

Blelloch, Paul A.↗

Free-vibration characteristics and correlation of a space station split-blanket solar array

Two methods for studying the free-vibration characteristics of a large split-blanket solar array in a zero-g cantilevered configuration are presented. The zero-g configuration corrresponds to an on-orbit configuration of the Space Station solar array. The first method applies the equations of continuum mechanics to determine the natural frequencies of the array; the second uses the finite element method program, MSC/NASTRAN. The stiffness matrix from the NASTRAN solution was found to be erroneously grounded. The results from the two methods are compared. It is concluded that the grounding does not seriously compromise the solution to the elastic modes of the solar array. However, the correct rigid body modes need to be included to obtain the correct dynamic model.

Carney, Kelly S.↗

Free-vibration characteristics and correlation of a Space Station split-blanket solar array

Two methods for studying the free-vibration characteristics of a large split-blanket solar array in a zero-g cantilevered configuration are presented. The zero-g configuration corresponds to an on-orbit configuration of the Space Station solar array. The first method applies the equations of continuum mechanics to determine the natural frequencies of the array; the second uses the finite element method program, MSC/NASTRAN. The stiffness matrix from the NASTRAN solution was found to be erroneously grounded. The results from the two methods are compared. It is concluded that the grounding does not seriously compromise the solution to the elastic modes of the solar array. However, the correct rigid body modes need to be icluded to obtain the correct dynamic model.

Carney, Kelly S.↗

Modal representations in control/structure interaction

When control/structure interaction problems are examined, a standard method for representing the structure is to choose a truncated set of normal modes calculated from either a finite-element or a distributed-parameter model. However, the normal modes can neglect important static information about the structure. Using a set of fixed interface modes results in a much more accurate closed-loop model, even when relatively low-bandwidth controllers are used. The fixed interface modes are calculated with control input degrees of freedom held fixed, and standard finite-element software can be used. Illustrative examples include a simple hinged beam and a complex model of the phase-I Space Station configuration.

Blelloch, Paul A.↗

Modal selection in structural dynamics

An overview of two modal selection procedures for lightly damped structural dynamic models is presented. Both procedures order the modes in terms of their contribution to the input/output dynamics of the model. A complex model of the Phase I Space Station is used to illustrate the application of these procedures to a realistic structure.

Blelloch, Paul A.↗

The effect of nonlinearities on the dynamic response of a large shuttle payload

The STS Centaur was designed to be a high energy upper stage for use with the Space Shuttle. Two versions were designed under development when the program was cancelled. The first version, designated G-prime, was for planetary missions. The second version, designated G, was to place spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit. As a part of the STS Centaur finite-element model verification effort, test articles of both versions were subjected to a series of static tests. In addition the Centaur G-prime test article was subjected to a series of dynamic tests including a modal survey. Both the static and dynamic tests showed that nonlinearities existed in the Centaur and its support system. The support system included flight-like latches. The nonlinearities were particularly apparent in tests that loaded the forward support structure of the Centaur. These test results were used to aid in the development of two improved finite-element models. The first was a linear model, while the second contained nonlinear elements at the boundaries. Results from both models were compared with the transient response obtained from a step-relaxation or twang test. The linear model was able to accurately match the low frequency response found in the test data. However, only the nonlinear model was able to match higher frequency response that was present in some of the test data. In addition the nonlinear model was able to predict other nonlinear behavior such as the dynamic jump that occurs in systems with nonlinear stiffness.

Sullivan, Timothy L.↗

The effect of nonlinearities on the dynamic response of a large Shuttle payload

The STS Centaur was designed to be a high energy upper stage for use with the Space Shuttle. Two versions were designed and under development when the program was cancelled. The first version, designated G-prime, was designed for planetary missions. The second version, designated G, was designed to place spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit. As a part of the STS Centaur finite-element model verification effort, test articles of both versions were subjected to a series of static tests. In addition the Centaur G-prime test article was subjected to a series of dynamic tests including a modal survey. Both the static and dynamic tests showed that nonlinearities existed in the Centaur and its support system. The support system included flight-like latches. The nonlinearities were particularly apparent in tests that loaded the forward support structure of the Centaur. These test results were used to aid in the development of two improved finite-element models. The first was a linear model, while the second contained nonlinear elements at the boundaries. Results from both models were compared with the transient response obtained from a step-relaxation or twang test. The linear model was able to accurately match the low frequency response found in the test data. However, only the nonlinear model was able to match higher frequency response that was present in some of the test data. In addition the nonlinear model was able to predict other nonlinear behavior such as the dynamic 'jump' that occurs in systems with nonlinear stiffness.

Sullivan, Timothy L.↗