Engineering PapersSearch

Engineering topics

Bugbee, Kaylin

Publications and source records attributed to Bugbee, Kaylin.

At least 19 records

A Unified Level of Service Model for NASA Earth Science Data Stewardship

During the past year, the Interagency Implementation and Concepts Team (IMPACT) reviewed existing service models in use at various NASA data centers in an effort to produce a unified, cohesive, and comprehensive Level of Service Model for all of NASA Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs). NASA DAACs are responsible for ensuring NASA Earth Science data are accurately and securely ingested, distributed, supported, and preserved. The term “Service" as used here refers to the spectrum of data management activities and outputs provided by DAACs in support of the data cared fo by each data cente. The unified Level-of- Service (LoS) model described in this presentation utilizes both the NASA-defined data product category and the data processing level to easily identify an appropriate level-of-service to be applied to a data product throughout the full data life cycle. This LoS model is to be used by DAACs when appraising incoming data in order to determine the appropriate and required services to provide. The LoS model utilizes a 3-level system in which services build upon previous levels and thereby require greater commitment and effort both on the part of the DAAC personnel and the data producer at the highest level. The LoS model description also contains examples of ways to communicate with data producers and data users what services can be expected, thereby bringing more consistent user experiences across the enterprise. In this presentation, we will outline the features of the LoS model and describe how it relates to the FAIR data practices and the NOAA Maturity Matrix model.

Smith, Deborah

Changing Climate, Changing Data: Exposing Climate Data to New Users Through GeoPlatform.gov’s Resilience Community

Over 700 climate related datasets were curated by subject matter experts into 9 thematic areas as a part of the Climate Data Initiative (CDI). NASA was tasked with maintaining the collection’s data inventory and supporting web pages at data.gov/climate. Today, the Data Curation for Discovery (DCD) team at MSFC continues to support the CDI collection. In order to expose the collection to a new and growing user community, the DCD team has partnered with GeoPlatform.gov to develop the Resilience community. The Resilience community serves as an interactive, topically-focused web portal that further promotes and shares CDI web content, datasets, services, maps, and other tools relevant to global resilience and change. This poster focuses on the team’s efforts to leverage GeoPlatform’s semantic applications to link CDI objects within the platform to improve discoverability. This poster also provides insights as to how this effort may serve as an example for building and expanding future Geoplatform.gov communities..

Sisco, Adam

Building a Data Ecosystem: A New Data Stewardship Paradigm for the Multi-Mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform (MAAP)

New adaptive approaches to Earth observation data stewardship need to be adopted in order to allow for higher data volumes, heterogeneous data and constantly evolving technologies. The data ecosystem approach to stewardship offers a viable solution to this need by placing an emphasis on the relationships between data, technologies and people. In this paper, we present the Joint ESA-NASA Multi-Mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform’s (MAAP) creation of a data ecosystem to support global aboveground terrestrial carbon dynamics research. We present the components needed to support the MAAP data ecosystem along with two data stewardship workflows used in the MAAP and the development of extended metadata for MAAP.

Bugbee, Kaylin

Alternative Datasets for Identification of Earth Science Events and Data

Alternative, or non-traditional, data sources can be used to generate datasets which can in turn be analyzed for temporal, spatial and climatological patterns. Events and case studies inferred from the analysis of these patterns can be used by the remote sensing community to more effectively search for Earth observation data. In this paper, we present a new alternative Earth science dataset created from the National Weather Service’s Area Forecast Discussion (AFD) documents. We then present an exploratory methodology for identifying interesting climatological patterns within the AFD data and a corresponding motivating example as to how these data and patterns can be used to search for relevant events or case studies.

Alternative data

Alternative Datasets for Identification of Earth Science Events and Data

Alternative, or non-traditional, data sources can be used to generate datasets which can in turn be analyzed for temporal, spatial and climatological patterns. Events and case studies inferred from the analysis of these patterns can be used by the remote sensing community to more effectively search for Earth observation data. In this paper, we present a new alternative Earth science dataset created from the National Weather Service’s Area Forecast Discussion (AFD) documents. We then present an exploratory methodology for identifying interesting climatological patterns within the AFD data and a corresponding motivating example as to how these data and patterns can be used to search for relevant events or case studies.

Bugbee, Kaylin

Collaborative Data Curation to Support the Multi-Mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform (MAAP)

Upcoming space-borne missions will offer unprecedented data about Earth but will also feature exponentially high data volumes. These high data volumes will change the way the scientific community works with data and will also create a unique need for improved data sharing and collaboration. NASA and ESA are working together to address these issues by collaboratively developing the Multi-Mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform (MAAP) to improve the understanding of global aboveground terrestrial carbon dynamics. The MAAP will support ESA’s BIOMASS mission, NASA’s GEDI mission and NASA/ISRO’s NISAR mission. The MAAP will be developed in two phases: a pilot phase and a full production phase. The pilot phase will demonstrate collaboration and basic capabilities. The pilot phase will focus on biomass relevant airborne and field campaign data. Two NASA teams are supporting the development of the MAAP. The MAAP engineering team is responsible for the development, maintenance and operations of the MAAP system while the MAAP data team ensures the ongoing quality of the data, metadata and other information provided in the MAAP. The MAAP data team also supports the ingest and archive of identified data to the MAAP platform. This poster describes the use case development process for the pilot MAAP and the data curated in support of those use cases. Additionally, this presentation will outline the pilot MAAP data ingest process and metadata curation effort along with efforts to ensure interoperability between ESA and NASA data and metadata.

Bugbee, Kaylin

Analysis and Review of NASA Earth Science Metadata: How Automation Plays a Role

The Analysis and Review of the Common Metadata Repository (CMR ARC) Team reviews all EOSDIS metadata. The team’s objective is to achieve consistency, correctness, and completeness for all metadata records in the CMR, as well as improve the discoverability of NASA's Earth Science data within the CMR framework. This work is currently being completed at Marshall Space Flight Center. CMR makes a single discovery point possible for NASA's Earth Science data users. The CMR team, in collaboration with three other core metadata teams, contributes to the stewardship of NASA's Earth Science data through a process of continual curation and the ongoing development of the Unified Metadata Model (UMM). A key tool now used in the curation process, referred to as the NASA CMR Dashboard, is an online curation dashboard developed in collaboration with software development company, Element 84. This tool facilitates the review of Earth Science metadata records and subsequent stakeholder collaboration on the resolution of identified issues. A key capability of the new tool is a suite of automated compliance checks written in Python 3.6 that verify the integrity of various metadata elements across multiple standards.

Staton, Patrick