Engineering topics

Buelow, Philip E. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Buelow, Philip E. O..

3 records

NASA NTRS1993

Efficiency and reliability enhancements in propulsion flowfield modeling

The implementation of traditional CFD algorithms in practical propulsion related flowfields often leads to dramatic reductions in efficiency and/or robustness. The present research is directed at understanding the reasons for this deterioration and finding methods to circumvent it. Work to date has focussed on low Mach number regions, viscous dominated regions, and high grid aspect ratios. Time derivative preconditioning, improved definition of the local time stepping, and appropriate application of boundary conditions are employed to decrease the required time to obtain a solution, while maintaining accuracy. A number of cases having features typical of rocket engine flowfields are computed to demonstrate the improvement over conventional methods. These cases include laminar and turbulent high Reynolds number flat plate boundary layers, flow over a backward-facing step, a diffusion flame, and wall heat-flux calculations in a turbulent converging-diverging nozzle. Results from these cases show convergence that is virtually independent of the local Mach number and the grid aspect ratio, which translates to a convergence speed-up of up to several orders of magnitude over conventional algorithms. Current emphasis is in extending these results to three-dimensional flows with highly stretched grids.

Buelow, Philip E. O.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Comparison between the PISO algorithm and preconditioning methods for compressible flow

Two widely used family of algorithms, pressure-based and density-based methods, have been developed for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problems over the years. Pressure-based methods (such as SIMPLE and PISO) use a Poisson-like equation for updating pressure instead of the continuity equation, while density-based methods use the continuity equation to update density (an equation of state is used to provide density in pressure based schemes and pressure in density based schemes). Pressure-based methods were developed originally for incompressible flows at low Reynolds numbers and were then extended to high Reynolds numbers and compressible applications. On the other hand, density based methods were originally developed for transonic flows and have been extended down to low Mach numbers through the use of preconditioning techniques. We compare these two very different approaches to solving the Navier-Stokes equations in order to gain an understanding of their similarities and differences. Specifically, we consider the PISO scheme as a representative pressure-based method and contrast it with a recently developed preconditioning scheme. We also compare the relative performance of the PISO algorithm with a Euler implicit algorithm that is employed to solve the preconditioned equations by means of a vector stability analysis.

Merkle, Charles L.↗

NASA NTRS1992

The relationship between pressure-based and density-based algorithms

The PISO, pressure-based algorithm, is compared with implicit time-marching systems to ascertain their similarities and differences. Both methods are expressed in vector form for comparison purposes. The vector form of the PISO method is triangular, allowing an uncoupled solution procedure, while the Euler implicit method requires the simultaneous solution of all equations. Upwind differencing is performed according to the direction of the eigenvalues in both systems, but this is the particle velocity in the PISO method and the acoustic velocity in the Euler method. Vector stability calculations show that the PISO method is conditionally stable depending on the time step, but that it provides adequate damping at small time steps to enable good convergence. Unconditional stability can be provided by retaining the energy coupling terms in the time derivative. Transforming the Euler implicit equations to the PISO variables along with a modification of the time derivatives gives the density-based method the same amplification factors at low speeds as the pressure-based method without affecting their behavior at high speeds.

Merkle, Charles L.↗