Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Bruce, W. E., Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to Bruce, W. E., Jr..

National Transonic Facility status

The National Transonic Facility (NTF) was operational in a combined checkout and test mode for about 3 years. During this time there were many challenges associated with movement of mechanical components, operation of instrumentation systems, and drying of insulation in the cryogenic environment. Most of these challenges were met to date along with completion of a basic flow calibration and aerodynamic tests of a number of configurations. Some of the major challenges resulting from cryogenic environment are reviewed with regard to hardware systems and data quality. Reynolds number effects on several configurations are also discussed.

Mckinney, L. W.↗

Testing and checkout experiences in the National Transonic Facility since becoming operational

The U.S. National Transonic Facility, constructed by NASA to meet the national needs for High Reynolds Number Testing, has been operational in a checkout and test mode since the operational readiness review (ORR) in late 1984. During this time, there have been problems centered around the effect of large temperature excursions on the mechanical movement of large components, the reliable performance of instrumentation systems, and an unexpected moisture problem with dry insulation. The more significant efforts since the ORR are reviewed and NTF status concerning hardware, instrumentation and process controls systems, operating constraints imposed by the cryogenic environment, and data quality and process controls is summarized.

Bruce, W. E., Jr.↗

The US National Transonic Facility, part 1

The construction of the National Transonic Facility was completed in September 1982, and checkout operations started the following month, with the maximum Reynolds number being obtained in May 1983. Following, most of the effort was devoted to installing the model access housings, and adjusting or altering various tunnel hardware systems. In May 1984, preliminary aerodynamic calibration of the tunnel was initiated in parallel with checkout of the tunnel operating systems, and in August 1984, the tunnel was declared operational and turned over to the user organization for a complete aerodynamic calibration and research and development testing. The facility has been operated in both the air and nitrogen modes covering a Mach number range of 0.2 to 1.22 at pressures up to 8.5 atm and at temperatures down to 100K. This paper presents a status of the tunnel operating systems and an overview of the major milestones during checkout.

Bruce, W. E., Jr.↗

The US National Transonic Facility, part 2

The construction of the National Transonic Facility was completed in September 1982, and checkout operations started the following month with the maximum Reynolds number being obtained in May 1983. Afterwards, effort was primarily devoted to installing the model access housings and adjusting or altering various tunnel hardware systems. In May 1984, the aerodynamic calibration started and was performed in parallel with checkout of the tunnel systems. In August 1984, the final operation readiness review was conducted and the facility declared operational for research testing. The facility has been operated in both air and nitrogen modes covering a Mach number range of 0.2 to 1.22 at pressures up to 8.5 atm and at temperatures doen to 100K. A limited amount of tunnel circuit performance information has been obtained and is presented in this paper. An aerodynamic calibration plan has been outlined, and the first part of the steady-state calibration has been completed, of which some results are presented in this paper. The first aerodynamic vehicle, Pathfinder I, was installed in December 1984 for checkout of instrumentation systems, and a status report and some results are presented.

Bruce, W. E., Jr.↗

National transonic facility shakedown test results and calibration plans

The results of the shakedown tests and the calibration plan of the National Transonic Facility (NTF) are presented. The facility is designed to operate in both air and nitrogen modes, cover Mach numbers from 0.2 to 1.2, pressures up to 8.8 atm and temperatures between 77 and 339 K. The facility data system is built around four 16-bit minicomputers with a total memory of three megabytes. A portable cryogenic chamber is available. The tunnel systems were operated in a series of tests in Mach number range of 0.2 to 1.17, pressures up to 8.5 atm, and temperatures down to 100 K. The calibration plan includes steady-state and dynamic calibration, as well as wall interference studies. The facility underwent the checkout of the model attitude, plenum isolation, and model access systems, followed by aerodynamic calibration in 1984. Schematic drawings and diagrams are included.

Bruce, W. E., Jr.↗

Techniques for aerothermal tests of large, flightweight thermal protection panels in a Mach 7 wind tunnel

Thermal performance and structural integrity are experimentally evaluated in the Langley 8-ft high temperature structures tunnel, which uses a combustion products test medium to provide realistic combinations of aerodynamic heating and loading. Recently developed techniques provide independent control of rate and magnitude of surface heating and differential pressure, protection against adverse acoustics buffeting during facility starting and stopping, programed radiant heating before exposing test panels to the high energy stream, and infrared radiometry for detailed surface temperatures. These techniques were verified repeatedly by return of useful data on metallic and nonmetallic panel concepts of reusable surface insulation.

Deveikis, W. D.↗

Techniques for aerothermal tests of large, flightweight thermal protection panels in a Mach 7 wind tunnel

Recently developed experimental techniques permit evaluating thermal performance and structural integrity of full-scale panel concepts applicable to reentry and hypersonic vehicles in the Langley 8-foot high-performance structures tunnel. Rate and magnitude of surface heating and differential-pressure loading are independently controlled. Realistic temperature distributions are radiantly preheated into the panel prior to aerodynamic heating, and stream conditions are preselected to sustain the preheat surface heating input during aerodynamic exposure. During tunnel start and shutdown, panels are shielded outside the stream from potentially damaging transient acoustics and buffeting and are then rapidly inserted into the hypersonic flow. Infrared radiometry provides detailed surveys of surface temperatures.

Deveikis, W. D.↗