Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Boris Diskin

Publications and source records attributed to Boris Diskin.

51 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Revised SA-neg Implementation and Assessment for Seventh Drag Prediction Workshop Solutions

Simulations performed by an unstructured-grid, cell-centered, finite-volume, mixed-element flow solver USM3D-MEwere presented at the Seventh Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-7). Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions for the NASA high-speed common research model wing-body configuration were computed using a new implementation of the negative variant of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model (SA-neg) with hierarchical adaptive nonlinear iteration method (HANIM).ThisUSM3D-ME enhancement improved efficiency and robustness of RANS solutions resulting in fast iterative convergence to machine zero residuals on mixed-element unstructured grids provided by the DPW-7 organizing committee. This paper presents theoretical foundations for the new implementation of the SA-neg model and analyzesUSM3D-ME solutions for flow conditions corresponding to the required DPW-7 cases.

Boris Diskin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Eigenvalue Sensitivity Computations for Linear Stability Theory

To realize the drag reduction benefit of boundary-layer transition control strategies, it is crucial to integrate transition prediction into the vehicle design through an optimization process. The integration of transition prediction based on linear stability analysis into adjoint d design optimization requires coupling an adjoint enabled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver with an adjoint enabled linear stability code. In particular, the boundary-layer transition location is often predicted using the N-factor method based on linear stability theory (LST). Thus, sensitivity of the linear-stability eigenvalues constitute an essential building block for optimizing the laminar flow performance. The present paper describes an implementation of LST eigenvalue sensitivity analysis that can be easily coupled with a CFD solver. Specifically, we describe a discrete adjoint formulation for the transition location prediction based on the N-factor method. The verification of this formulation is carried out by comparing the adjoint-based sensitivity of the local growth rate of a given instability mode with respect to the disturbance frequency, and the adjoint-based sensitivity of the transition location with respect to spanwise wavenumber with those sensitivities computed using a finite-difference approximation. Finally, the adjoint LST formulation is applied to flat-plate boundary-layer flows at transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic conditions, to determine the behavior and sensitivities of the transition location with respect to a range of disturbance spanwise wavenumbers.

Boundary Layer Transition↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of UMUSCL Scheme for DNS of Turbulent Flows

Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is performed using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology for canonical turbulent flow configurations to assess the effect of the upwinding parameter (κ) in the unstructured monotonic upstream scheme for conservation laws (UMUSCL) reconstruction scheme. The NASA FUN3D solver is used, and four turbulent validation cases are considered: periodic Taylor-Green vortex, (2) flow through a plane channel, (3) flow through a channel with a constriction, and (4) flow over a flat plate. The results are presented for κ = 0.5, 0.9 and 1 on hexahedral grids, with the last value corresponding to a zero-numerical dissipation scheme. Detailed comparisons with available reference data indicate that for the smallest length-scales simulated, κ = 0.5 is too dissipative while κ = 1 could lead to an energy build-up. Overall, κ =0.9 yields satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and robustness for all the cases considered in this study.

Direct Numerical Simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Solutions for RANS Test Suite of High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024

USM3D-ME solutions for the High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024 are presented. Solutions are computed for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the Spalart-Allmaras one equation turbulence model, SA-neg-QCR2000-R, that is enhanced with a nonlinear correction to the turbulence stresses and a correction for flow rotation. USM3D-ME solutions have been computed for the three verification cases, namely, a Joukowski airfoil, a subsonic three-dimensional flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in tunnel, and subsonic flow around a high-lift wing-body configuration. Iterative convergence of USM3D-ME solutions on several grids within various grid families is demonstrated. Grid convergence of integrated forces, pitching moment and sectional variations of surface pressure and skin friction are also presented.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of UMUSCL Scheme for DNS of Turbulent Flows

Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) are performed using the FUN3D code ( https://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov) for three validation cases: (1) flow through a plane channel, (2) flow through a channel with a constriction, and (3) flow over a flat plate. FUN3D is a node-centered finite-volume code developed at the NASA Langley Research Center that solves the three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured computational grids. The simulations are performed employing the 2nd-order unstructured monotonic upstream scheme for conservation laws (UMUSCL). The results are compared with available experimental and numerical data. The effect of the UMUSCL reconstruction parameter (κ) is assessed, and the results indicate that κ = 0.9 yields satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and robustness compared to available data. Further analyses of the results, along with additional test cases and grids will be presented in the final manuscript.

Direct Numerical Simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Natural Laminar Flow Airfoils

Natural laminar flow technology is a passive laminar flow control (LFC) strategy that seeks to delay the onset of boundary-layer transition (BLT) through shape optimization to reduce the drag of the aerodynamic vehicle. Adjoint-based design optimization for LFC is proposed in an integrated multidisciplinary framework, which includes the computational fluid dynamics (CFD), geometry and grid deformation, and linear stability analysis (LSA) for transition prediction. In particular, the BLT location is predicted using the dual N-factor method that is based on a linear stability theory (LST) eigenvalue problem. The dual N-factor criterion accounts for the amplification of planar Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) and stationary crossflow (CF) boundary-layer instabilities to predict the transition location in three-dimensional boundary-layer flows. The adjoint-based shape optimization procedure is based on an iteratively coupled CFD and LSA methodology to converge the transition location and flow solutions, as well as to calculate the sensitivities of the aerodynamic metrics of interest with respect to the flow and shape design parameters. The RAE 2822 airfoil at 0 and 30 degrees yaw angles, an angle of attack of 0.72 degrees, and subsonic conditions (M∞ = 0.19, Rec = 5.6 × 106 ) are used as baseline configurations for design optimization. The angle of attack and the vertical displacement of free-form-deformation control points are used as design variables to reduce the drag coefficient while reaching a specified lift coefficient. The optimized unswept airfoil designs achieve a 30% drag reduction accompanied by a downstream shift of the transition locations over both suction and pressure sides of the airfoil. The initial design iterations for the swept case also show a favorable trend in the drag reduction with transition delay over both sides.

Transition↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Closed-Loop Simulations of Human-Scale Mars Lander Descent Trajectories on Frontier

A computational campaign was performed to run high-fidelity, free-flight simulations of a human-scale Mars lander concept vehicle decelerating under retropropulsion through the Martian atmosphere with closed-loop flight control. A novel approach is used to couple computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software with a mature flight mechanics package, where the two applications communicate in real-time across two geographically-dispersed computational facilities. The CFD is performed on the Frontier exascale system located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the flight mechanics are executed on a system located at NASA Langley Research Center. In the current campaign, CFD is performed using finite-rate chemistry to account for the interactions between the LOXCH 4 engines and the CO 2 Martian atmosphere. A simulation of a closed-loop main engine throttling and RCS actuation is presented, demonstrating that the vehicle and model are able to maintain stability in a long-duration CFD-in-the-loop flight simulation. Comparisons are made to a reduced order model ignoring aero-propulsive interactions.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024 Summary: Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000-R Turbulence Model

This paper summarizes solutions submitted for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) test suite of the High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop. The goal of the workshop is to establish standards for verification of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches to simulations of steady and unsteady turbulent flows. The RANS verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model with quadratic constitutive relation and rotation correction, SA-neg-QCR2000-R. The verification test cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a three-dimensional subsonic flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in a tunnel, and a subsonic flow around a wing-body configuration developed for verification of solvers participating in the 5 𝑡 ℎ High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The turbulencemodel formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and reference solutions are described in detail. Solutions for the test cases are computed by seven established CFD solvers on adaptedand fixed-grid families using different discretization approaches. While some noticeable differences between solutions remain, the results achieved by contributing solvers show that different solutions computed for the same RANS model on different grid families can converge to a common limit with grid refinement. The apparent requirements for grid convergence are a well designed family of grids that provide sufficient resolution in important areas and a strong solver capable of deep iterative convergence on each grid. For each test case in the study, the variation between aerodynamic forces computed by different solvers on the finest grids of different families is less than 2%.

Boris Diskin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Large-Scale Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Aerospace Configurations on the Frontier Exascale System

Over the past fifteen years, the high performance computing landscape has undergone a seismic shift in both hardware and software paradigms, which has been necessary to realize a 1000× leap in computational performance while meeting stringent constraints on power consumption. A historical overview of a long-term research effort aimed at addressing these challenges within the context of a commonly-used aerospace computational fluid dynamics (CFD) application is presented. Details of the current implementation as they relate to the new era of exascale-relevant hardware architectures and programming models are described. Two large-scale simulations of aerospace configurations are performed using the entire Frontier exascale system, currently ranked as the most powerful supercomputing system in the world. The effort serves to address a 2024 milestone posed a decade ago by the seminal CFD Vision 2030 Study.

Eric J Nielsen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

WMLES for the Fifth High-Lift PredictionWorkshop Cases Using FUN3D

This paper presents solution assessments and grid convergence studies for the test cases outlined in the Fifth High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-5), focusing on the high-lift Common Research Models (CRM-HL). The study utilizes a wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) methodology developed in the unstructured-grid, node-centered flow solver FUN3D. The second-order accurate simulations conducted in this study utilize a finite-volume spatial discretization and an implicit temporal scheme. Large-scale turbulent features are resolved away from the wall, with small-scale effects captured by the Vreman subgrid-scale model. An equilibrium wall function uses the first grid point off the wall serving as the critical interface between the wall model and the large-eddy simulation region, thus requiring careful placement in grid design. WMLES solutions are assessed for HLPW-5 cases, including a clean wing-body configuration and geometry-buildup configurations corresponding to the 5.1\% ONERA CRM-HL model. Grid-convergence studies are systematically conducted using uniformly refined grids. Moreover, simulation results and grid sensitivity are presented for the NASA 5.2\% CRM-HL configuration at both moderate and flight-scale Reynolds numbers. Overall, WMLES results are satisfactory and agree well with available experimental data, especially on sufficiently fine grids.

high-lift aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Lift Prediction Workshop 5: Summary of Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Technology Focus Group Summary

The fifth High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-5), which involved the high-lift version of the NASA common research model in several configurations, assessed various computational fluid dynamics methods, including Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and hybrid large-eddy simulations. This paper summarizes RANS solutions computed on fixed grids. Case 1, a verification case, considered a simple wing-body configuration and focused on grid convergence of lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients. Case 2 is a configuration buildup case that focused on predicting the effects of increasing geometric complexity. For buildup configurations with slats, flaps, and a nacelle/pylon (configurations 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4), wind-tunnel data were provided by ONERA. Case 3 focused on the reference landing configuration at four Reynolds-number conditions. For Case 1, grid-converged RANS solutions were achieved using the standard Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model and the SA model with a quadratic constitutive relation and a rotation correction. Agreement between RANS solutions was observed for the simplest configuration 2.1 of Case 2 with the standard SA model. For other configurations, agreement between RANS solutions was hampered by insufficient iterative and grid convergence, especially at high angles of attack. In comparison with the experiment, RANS solutions qualitatively showed the correct configuration buildup trend but underpredicted lift and overpredicted both drag and pitching moment at high angles of attack.

Boris Diskin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by NASA’s flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data Simulations for Cases 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in a relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing URANS simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by the NASA flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data. Simulations for Case 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing unsteady RANS (URANS) simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

Aerodynamics↗