Engineering topics

Bhattacharyya, S. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Bhattacharyya, S. P..

10 records

NASA NTRS1998

Robust Control Design via Linear Programming

This paper deals with the problem of synthesizing or designing a feedback controller of fixed dynamic order. The closed loop specifications considered here are given in terms of a target performance vector representing a desired set of closed loop transfer functions connecting various signals. In general these point targets are unattainable with a fixed order controller. By enlarging the target from a fixed point set to an interval set the solvability conditions with a fixed order controller are relaxed and a solution is more easily enabled. Results from the parametric robust control literature can be used to design the interval target family so that the performance deterioration is acceptable, even when plant uncertainty is present. It is shown that it is possible to devise a computationally simple linear programming approach that attempts to meet the desired closed loop specifications.

Keel, L. H.↗

NASA NTRS1992

The 32nd CDC: System identification using interval dynamic models

Motivated by the recent explosive development of results in the area of parametric robust control, a new technique to identify a family of uncertain systems is identified. The new technique takes the frequency domain input and output data obtained from experimental test signals and produces an 'interval transfer function' that contains the complete frequency domain behavior with respect to the test signals. This interval transfer function is one of the key concepts in the parametric robust control approach and identification with such an interval model allows one to predict the worst case performance and stability margins using recent results on interval systems. The algorithm is illustrated by applying it to an 18 bay Mini-Mast truss structure.

Keel, L. H.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Stability margins for multilinear interval systems by way of phase conditions: A unified approach

A simple way of checking the stability with respect to an arbitrary stability region of a family of polynomials containing a vector of parameters varying within prescribed intervals is discussed. It is assumed that the parameters appear affine multilinearly in the characteristic polynomial coefficients. The condition proposed is simply to check the phase difference of the vertex polynomials. This test based on the mapping theorem significantly reduces computational complexity. Mathematical proofs are omitted. The results can be used to determine various stability margins of control systems containing interconnected interval subsystems. These include the gain, phase, time-delay, H(sup infinity), and nonlinear sector bounded stability margins of multilinear interval systems.

Keel, L. H.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Parametric stability margin for multilinear interval control systems

Recently, a necessary and sufficient condition to determine the robust stability of a multilinear interval control system has been reported as an extension of the well-known Box theorem which deals with the linear affine case. A simple but computationally efficient algorithm, based on the above result, to check the robust stability of such systems is introduced. The method is also extended to find the parametric stability margin of such a system.

Keel, L. H.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Robust stability and control of linear and multilinear interval systems

This paper is a survey of recent results obtained by the authors and their coworkers on the robust stability and control of systems containing parametric uncertainty. The starting point is a generalization of Kharitonov's theorem obtained by Chapellat and Bhattacharyya in 1989. This theorem, called the Linear CB theorem, its generalization to the multilinear case, the singling out of extremal stability subsets, and other ramifications now constitute an extensive and coherent theory of robust parametric stability that is summarized in the results contained here.

Bhattacharyya, S. P.↗

NASA NTRS1990

State-space design of low-order stabilizers

An algorithm is presented for stabilizing a linear multivariable system with a controller of fixed dynamic order. This is an output feedback stabilization problem. The algorithm attempts to solve this by a sequence of approximate pole assignment problems. The approximation is driven by the optimization of an objective function consisting of a weighted sum of the condition number of the closed-loop eigenvectors and the norm of the difference between the computed and actual equivalent state-feedback controls.

Keel, L. H.↗

NASA NTRS1989

The 32nd CDC: Robust stabilizer synthesis for interval plants using Nevanlina-pick theory

The synthesis of robustly stabilizing compensators for interval plants, i.e., plants whose parameters vary within prescribed ranges is discussed. Well-known H(sup infinity) methods are used to establish robust stabilizability conditions for a family of plants and also to synthesize controllers that would stabilize the whole family. Though conservative, these methods give a very simple way to come up with a family of robust stabilizers for an interval plant.

Bhattacharya, Saikat↗

NASA NTRS1988

Stability margins for Hurwitz polynomials

The authors treat the robust stability issue using the characteristic polynomial, for two different cases: first in coefficient space with respect to perturbations in the coefficient of the characteristic polynomial; and then for a control system containing perturbed parameters in the transfer function description of the plant. In coefficient space, a simple expression is first given for the l-(squared) stability margin for both the monic and nonmonic cases. Following this, a method is given to find the l(infinity) margin, and the method is extended to reveal much larger stability regions. In parameter space the authors consider all single-input (multi-output) or single-output (multi-input) systems with a fixed controller and a plant described by a set of transfer functions which are ratios of polynomials with variable coefficients. A procedure is presented to calculate the radius of the largest stability ball in the space of these variable parameters. The calculation serves as a stability margin for the control system. The formulas that result are quasi-closed-form expressions for the stability margin and are computationally efficient.

Chapellat, Herve↗

NASA NTRS1975

The structure of robust observers

Conventional observers for linear time-invariant systems are shown to be structurally inadequate from a sensitivity standpoint. It is proved that if a linear dynamic system is to provide observer action despite arbitrary small perturbations in a specified subset of its parameters, it must: (1) be a closed loop system, be driven by the observer error, (2) possess redundancy, the observer must be generating, implicitly or explicitly, at least one linear combination of states that is already contained in the measurements, and (3) contain a perturbation-free model of the portion of the system observable from the external input to the observer. The procedure for design of robust observers possessing the above structural features is established and discussed.

Bhattacharyya, S. P.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Robust design of dynamic observers

The two (identity) observer realizations z = Mz + Ky and z = transpose of Az + transpose of K(y - transpose of Cz), respectively called the open loop and closed loop realizations, for the linear system x = Ax, y = Cx are analyzed with respect to the requirement of robustness; i.e., the requirement that the observer continue to regulate the error x - z satisfactorily despite small variations in the observer parameters from the projected design values. The results show that the open loop realization is never robust, that robustness requires a closed loop implementation, and that the closed loop realization is robust with respect to small perturbations in the gains transpose of K if and only if the observer can be built to contain an exact replica of the unstable and underdamped dynamics of the system being observed. These results clarify the stringent accuracy requirements on both models and hardware that must be met before an observer can be considered for use in a control system.

Bhattacharyya, S. P.↗