Engineering topics

Bennett, R. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Bennett, R. M..

At least 19 records

NASA NTRS1988

Flutter analysis of highly swept delta wings by conventional methods

The flutter boundaries of six thin highly-swept delta-platform wings have been calculated. Comparisons are made between experimental data and results using several aerodynamic methods. The aerodynamic methods used include a subsonic and supersonic kernel function, second order piston theory, and a transonic small disturbance code. The dynamic equations of motion are solved using analytically calculated mode shapes and frequencies.

Gibbons, M. D.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Calculation of transonic steady and oscillatory pressures on a low aspect ratio model and comparison with experiment

Pressure data measured by the British Royal Aircraft Establishment for the AGARD SMP tailplane are compared with results calculated using the transonic small perturbation code XTRAN3S. A brief description of the analysis is given and a recently developed finite difference grid is described. Results are presented for five steady and nine harmonically oscillating cases near zero angle of attack and for a range of subsonic and transonic Mach numbers.

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Transonic calculations for a flexible supercritical wing and comparison with experiment

Pressure data measured on the flexible DAST ARW-2 wing are compared with results calculated using the transonic small perturbation code XTRAN3S. A brief description of the analysis is given and a recently-developed grid coordinate transformation is described. Calculations are presented for the rigid and flexible wing for Mach numbers from 0.60 to 0.90 and dynamic pressures from 0 to 1000 psf. Calculated and measured static pressures and wing deflections are compared, and calculated static aeroelastic trends are given. Attempts to calculate the transonic instability boundary of the wing are described.

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Transonic calculations for a flexible supercritical wing and comparison with experiment

Pressure data measured on the flexible DAST ARW-2 wing are compared with results calculated using the transonic small perturbation code XTRAN3S. A brief description of the analysis is given and a recently developed grid coordinate transformation is described. Calculations are presented for the rigid and flexible wing for Mach numbers from 0.60 to 0.90 and dynamic pressures from 0 to 1000 psf. Calculated and measured static pressures and wing deflections are compared, and calculated static aeroelastic trends are given. Attempts to calculate the transonic instability boundary of the wing are described.

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Calculation of transonic steady and oscillatory pressures on a low aspect ratio model and comparison with experiment

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Time-marching transonic flutter solutions including angle-of-attack effects

Previously cited in issue 13, p. 2109, Accession no. A82-30152

Edwards, J. W.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Some recent applications of XTRAN3S

A time-marching finite difference code, XTRAN3S, that solves the three-dimensional transonic small perturbation equation for flow over isolated wings has recently been developed. During initial applications of the program, problems were encountered in the prediction of unsteady forces. The use of a revised grid and force calculation scheme improved those predictions. Comparisons are made between predicted and experimental pressure data for a rectangular supercritical wing. Comparisons of steady and unsteady data at freestream Mach number = 0.700 show good agreement between calculated and experimental values. A comparison of steady data at freestream Mach number = 0.825 shows poor agreement between calculations and experiment. Program difficulties have been encountered with swept and tapered configurations.

Seidel, D. A.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Some recent applications of XTRAN3S

A time marching finite difference code, XTRAN3S that solves the three dimensional transonic small perturbation equation for flow over isolated wings was developed. During initial applications of the program, problems were encountered in the prediction of unsteady forces. The use of a revised grid and force calculation scheme improved those predictions. Comparisons are made between predicted and experimental pressure data for a rectangular supercritical wing. Comparisons of steady and unsteady data at M sub infinity = 0.700 show good agreement between calculated and experimental values. A comparison of steady data at M sub infinity 0.825 shows poor agreement between calculations and experiment. Program difficulties were encountered with swept and tapered configurations.

Seidel, D. A.↗

NASA NTRS1983

An exploratory study of finite difference grids for transonic unsteady aerodynamics

A pulse-transfer function technique for calculating unsteady aerodynamic forces for a wide range of reduced frequencies is implemented in a finite difference program solving the complete unsteady transonic small perturbation equation. Forces are calculated for a two-dimensional linear flat plate case utilizing the default grids from several currently used finite difference programs. The forces are compared to exact theoretical values and grid generated boundary and internal reflections are demonstrated. Grids designed to alleviate the reflections are presented and forces for a 6% thick parabolic arc airfoil are calculated to investigate non-linear transonic effects.

Seidel, D. A.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Planar-Wing Flutter Analysis

Flutter Analysis System, FAST, is group of five programs that perform flutter analysis of single planar wing. Each program performs certain portions of flutter analysis and may be run sequentially or individually. Modular approach is very versatile and flexible. FAST uses natural vibration modes as input data and performs conventional V-g solution.

Desmarais, R. N.↗

NASA NTRS1982

An exploratory study of finite difference grids for transonic unsteady aerodynamics

Unsteady aerodynamic forces are calculated by the XTRAN2L finite difference program which solves the complete two dimensional unsteady transonic small perturbation equation. The unsteady forces are obtained using a pulse transfer function technique which assumes the flow field behaves in a locally linear fashion about a mean condition. Forces are calculated for a linear flat plate using the default grids from the LTRAN2-NLR, LTRAN2-HI, and XTRAN3S programs. The forces are compared to the exact theoretical values for flat plate, and grid generated boundary and internal numerical reflections are observed to cause significant errors in the unsteady airloads. Grids are presented that alleviate the reflections while reducing computational time up to fifty-three percent and program size up to twenty-eight percent. Forces are presented for a six percent thick parabolic arc airfoil which demonstrate that the transform technique may be successfully applied to nonlinear transonic flows.

Seidel, D. A.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Application of Zimmerman flutter-margin criterion to a wind tunnel model

The Zimmerman flutter margin criterion was studied by applying it to data obtained from a wind tunnel model. The sensitivity of the flutter margin parameter was explored with a parametric trend study and by calculation of the derivatives with respect to the input frequency and damping parameters. The criterion is simple in concept and application, and it serves as a good flutter onset predictor because it gives a nearly linear variation with dynamic pressure. However, accurate values of both frequency and damping of both modes involved in flutter are required for reliable flutter onset prediction. The simplified version using only frequencies gave a highly nonconservative flutter onset in one case and should not be used in general.

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Application of a transonic potential flow code to the static aeroelastic analysis of three-dimensional wings

Since the aerodynamic theory is nonlinear, the method requires the coupling of two iterative processes - an aerodynamic analysis and a structural analysis. A full potential analysis code, FLO22, is combined with a linear structural analysis to yield aerodynamic load distributions on and deflections of elastic wings. This method was used to analyze an aeroelastically-scaled wind tunnel model of a proposed executive-jet transport wing and an aeroelastic research wing. The results are compared with the corresponding rigid-wing analyses, and some effects of elasticity on the aerodynamic loading are noted.

Whitlow, W., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Time-marching transonic flutter solutions including angle-of-attack effects

Transonic aeroelastic solutions based upon the transonic small perturbation potential equation were studied. Time-marching transient solutions of plunging and pitching airfoils were analyzed using a complex exponential modal identification technique, and seven alternative integration techniques for the structural equations were evaluated. The HYTRAN2 code was used to determine transonic flutter boundaries versus Mach number and angle-of-attack for NACA 64A010 and MBB A-3 airfoils. In the code, a monotone differencing method, which eliminates leading edge expansion shocks, is used to solve the potential equation. When the effect of static pitching moment upon the angle-of-attack is included, the MBB A-3 airfoil can have multiple flutter speeds at a given Mach number.

Edwards, J. W.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Time-marching transonic flutter solutions including angle-of-attack effects

Transonic aeroelastic solutions based upon the transonic small perturbation potential equation are studied. Time-marching transient solutions of plunging and pitching airfoils are analyzed using a complex exponential modal identification technique, and seven alternative integration techniques for the structural equations are evaluated. The HYTRAN2 code is used to determine transonic flutter boundaries versus Mach number and angle-of-attack for NACA 64A010 and MBB A-3 airfoils. In that code, a monotone differencing method, which eliminates leading edge expansion shocks, is used to solve the potential equation. When the effect of static pitching moment upon the angle-of-attack is included, the MBB A-3 airfoil can have multiple flutter speeds at a given Mach number.

Edwards, J. W.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Application of a transonic potential flow code to the static aeroelastic analysis of three-dimensional wings

A method for including elastic effects in steady, transonic wing analysis is presented. Since the aerodynamic theory is nonlinear, the method requires the coupling of two iterative processes - an aerodynamic analysis and a structural analysis. A full potential analysis code, FL022, is combined with a linear structural analysis to yield aerodynamic load distributions on and deflections of elastic wings. This method was used to analyze an aeroelastically-scaled wind tunnel model of a proposed executive-jet transport wing and an aeroelastic research wing. The results are compared with the corresponding rigid-wing analyses, and some effects of elasticity on the aerodynamic loading are noted.

Whitlow, W., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1981

Application of a flight test and data analysis technique to flutter of a drone aircraft

Modal identification results presented were obtained from recent flight flutter tests of a drone vehicle with a research wing (DAST ARW-1 for Drones for Aerodynamic and Structural Testing, Aeroelastic Research Wing-1). This vehicle is equipped with an active flutter suppression system (FSS). Frequency and damping of several modes are determined by a time domain modal analysis of the impulse response function obtained by Fourier transformations of data from fast swept sine wave excitation by the FSS control surface on the wing. Flutter points are determined for two different altitudes with the FSS off. Data are given for near the flutter boundary with the FSS on.

Bennett, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1981

Application of a flight test and data analysis technique to flutter of a drone aircraft

Modal identification results are presented that were obtained from recent flight flutter tests of a drone vehicle with a research wing equipped with an active flutter suppression system (FSS). Frequency and damping of several modes are determined by a time domain modal analysis of the impulse response function obtained by Fourier transformations of data from fast swept sine wave excitation by the FSS control surfaces on the wing. Flutter points are determined for two different altitudes with the FSS off. Data are given for near the flutter boundary with the FSS on.

Bennett, R. M.↗