Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Bartholomew, Timothy V.

Publications and source records attributed to Bartholomew, Timothy V..

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Component innovations for lower cost mechanical vapor compression

Despite significant capital and operating costs, mechanical vapor compression (MVC) remains the preferred technology for challenging brine concentration applications. Here, this work seeks to assess the dependence of MVC costs on feedwater salinity and desired water recovery and to quantify the value of improved component performance or reduced component costs for reducing the levelized cost of water (LCOW) of MVC. We built a cost optimization model coupling thermophysical, heat and mass transfer, and technoeconomic models to optimize and identify low cost MVC system designs as a function of feedwater salinity and water recovery. The LCOW ranges over 3.6 to 6.1 $\$$/m 3 for seawater feed salinities of 25–150 g/kg and water recoveries of 40–80 %. We then perform sensitivity analysis on parameter inputs to isolate irreducible costs and determine high value component innovation targets. The LCOW was most sensitive to evaporator material costs and performance, including the overall heat transfer coefficient in the evaporator. Process and material innovations such as polymer-composite evaporator tubes that reduce evaporator costs by 25 % without reducing heat transfer performance by more than 10 % would result in MVC cost reductions of 8 %.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse

Ultrafiltration (UF) has been widely utilized as water pretreatment for different applications especially in water reuse. The UF system operation is characterized by a filtration phase, where particles accumulate on the membrane surface resulting in an increase in the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and a cleaning phase, where foulants are removed through cleaning cycles including physical backwash and chemical-enhanced backwash (CEB). In this study, data from an engineering-scale UF system treating reclaimed wastewater were used to assess the impact of backwashing on the filtration process. TMP backwash trigger, backwash duration, and CEB frequency were purposely varied for a cycle-by-cycle investigation on the net water production, water recovery, initial operating TMP, and filtration cycle duration. As the TMP backwash trigger was varied between 62 and 145kPa, the maximum net water production (63 m 3 /d) was achieved at 103kPa and water recovery remained relatively constant at approximately 92%. Backwash durations of 45, 65, and 85s were performed where both net water production and water recovery yielded similar results (~63 m 3 /d and ~ 91%) compared with 103kPa TMP backwash trigger. The CEB frequency was also lowered from one every three backwashes (1/3) to 1/6 and 1/12 and resulted in decreased net water production and water recovery while the initial TMP increased. Interestingly, the total number of CEBs remained approximately constant regardless of their frequency. In conclusion, results suggest that CEB is an important fouling control process to maximize water production.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cost optimization of low-salt-rejection reverse osmosis

Low-salt-rejection reverse osmosis (LSRRO) is an emerging membrane-based desalination technology for concentrating brines with potentially lower energy consumption and cost than thermally driven processes. We assess the technoeconomic performance of LSRRO by using an optimization model that minimizes the levelized cost of water (LCOW). We develop detailed models for the RO module and other equipment using WaterTAP (Water treatment Technoeconomic Assessment Platform), an open-source simulation and optimization software for water treatment. We improve upon previous LSRRO cost optimization studies by optimizing the salt permeability for each stage, which has significant implications for technoeconomic performance. We present the cost-optimal design, operation, and performance for three cases: 35 g/L TDS feed at 70% recovery, 70 g/L at 55%, and 125 g/L at 35%. The cost-optimal LCOW and specific energy consumption (SEC) for these cases are 0.70, 1.89, and 7.41 $/m 3 and 3.9, 8.4, and 30.4 kWh/m 3 , respectively. For each case, we use sensitivity analyses to provide guidance on key factors that impact economic viability. We also present the cost-optimal LCOW and SEC for feed concentrations between 5 and 220 g/L TDS and recoveries between 30 and 90%. So, we compare LSRRO to other high-salinity desalination technologies and find that it may be cost-competitive below feed concentrations of 125 g/L.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗