Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Asbury, Scott C.

Publications and source records attributed to Asbury, Scott C..

22 records · Page 2

Thrust vectoring characteristics of the F-18 high alpha research vehicle at angles of attack from 0 to 70 deg

An investigation was conducted to determine the multiaxis thrust-vectoring characteristics of the F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV). A 0.10-scale model was modified with hardware to simulate the three-vane thrust vectoring system of the F-18/HARV. This investigation was conducted at Mach numbers ranging from 0.30 to 0.70, at angles of attack from 0 to 70 deg, and nozzle-pressure ratios from 2.0 to approximately 5.0. Results indicate that the thrust vectoring system of F-18/HARV can successfully generate multiaxis thrust vectoring. During vectoring, resultant thrust-vector angles were always less than the corresponding geometric vane deflection angle and were accompanied by large thrust losses.

Asbury, Scott C.↗

A static investigation of the thrust vectoring system of the F/A-18 high-alpha research vehicle

A static (wind-off) test was conducted in the static test facility of the Langley 16-foot Transonic Tunnel to evaluate the vectoring capability and isolated nozzle performance of the proposed thrust vectoring system of the F/A-18 high alpha research vehicle (HARV). The thrust vectoring system consisted of three asymmetrically spaced vanes installed externally on a single test nozzle. Two nozzle configurations were tested: A maximum afterburner-power nozzle and a military-power nozzle. Vane size and vane actuation geometry were investigated, and an extensive matrix of vane deflection angles was tested. The nozzle pressure ratios ranged from two to six. The results indicate that the three vane system can successfully generate multiaxis (pitch and yaw) thrust vectoring. However, large resultant vector angles incurred large thrust losses. Resultant vector angles were always lower than the vane deflection angles. The maximum thrust vectoring angles achieved for the military-power nozzle were larger than the angles achieved for the maximum afterburner-power nozzle.

Mason, Mary L.↗

Static performance of a cruciform nozzle with multiaxis thrust-vectoring and reverse-thrust capabilities

A multiaxis thrust vectoring nozzle designed to have equal flow turning capability in pitch and yaw was conceived and experimentally tested for internal, static performance. The cruciform-shaped convergent-divergent nozzle turned the flow for thrust vectoring by deflecting the divergent surfaces of the nozzle, called flaps. Methods for eliminating physical interference between pitch and yaw flaps at the larger multiaxis deflection angles was studied. These methods included restricting the pitch flaps from the path of the yaw flaps and shifting the flow path at the throat off the nozzle centerline to permit larger pitch-flap deflections without interfering with the operation of the yaw flaps. Two flap widths were tested at both dry and afterburning settings. Vertical and reverse thrust configurations at dry power were also tested. Comparison with two dimensional convergent-divergent nozzles showed lower but still competitive thrust performance and thrust vectoring capability.

Wing, David J.↗

Static performance of a multiaxis thrust vectoring cruciform nozzle

A multiaxis thrust vectoring nozzle designed to have equal flow turning capability in pitch and yaw is investigated, and methods for obtaining large multiaxis thrust vector angles without physical vectoring flap interference are studied. These methods include restricting the pitch flaps from the path of the yaw flaps, and shifting the flow path at the throat off the nozzle centerline in order to permit larger pitch flap deflections without interfering with operation of the yaw flaps. The results obtained show that unvectored performance of the cruciform nozzle is only slightly lower (0.5 to 1.0 percent) than that of previously tested axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric nozzles, despite the complex internal geometry. The shifted-throat nozzle design has larger thrust vector angles at the nozzle pressure ratio of peak resultant thrust efficiency, but has 1 to 2 percent lower peak thrust performance than the restricted-flap nozzle design.

Wing, David J.↗