Engineering topics

Andy Broeren

Publications and source records attributed to Andy Broeren.

16 records

NASA NTRS2022

NASA Analysis of Alternatives Study for Icing Research

In 2020, NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate commissioned a study of the icing research area to provide a broad and comprehensive assessment of priority needs for NASA and enduring needs for the aviation community. Priority needs were those that supported four key focus areas for NASA Aeronautics—Transonic Truss-Braced Wing, Electrified Aircraft Propulsion, Small-Core Turbine Engine, and High-Rate Composite Manufacturing—as well as other priority areas, such as Advanced Air Mobility, Certification by Analysis, and Commercial Supersonic Technology. Enduring needs were the additional long-term capabilities and expertise identified by the aviation community as being critical for NASA to provide. This study is called an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) because a large number of icing research needs were identified and analyzed to determine the highest priorities for NASA key focus areas and those that will endure into the future. This report offers a detailed description and results of the AoA study for icing research.

Aircraft Icing, Aircraft Icing, Rotorcraft Icing, ↗

NASA NTRS2019

Additional Comparison of Iced Aerodynamic Measurements on a Swept Wing From Two Wind Tunnels

Artificial ice shapes of various geometric fidelity were tested on a wing model based on the Common Research Model. Low Reynolds number test were conducted at Wichita State University's Walter H. Beech Memorial Wind utilizing an 8.9% scale model, and high Reynolds number tests were conducted at ONERA's F1 wind tunnel utilizing a 13.3% scale model. Several identical geometrically-scaled ice shapes were tested at both facilities, and the results were compared at overlapping Reynolds and Mach numbers. This was to ensure that the results and trends observed at low Reynolds number could be applied and continued to high, near-flight Reynolds number. The data from Wichita State University and ONERA F1 agreed well at matched Reynolds and Mach numbers. The lift and pitching moment curves agreed very well for most configurations. This confirmed results from previous tests with other ice shapes that indicated the data from the low Reynolds number tests could be used to understand ice-swept-wing aerodynamics at high Reynolds number. This allows ice aerodynamics testing to be performed at low Reynolds number facilities with much lower operating costs and generate results that are applicable to flight Reynolds number.

Scale models↗

NASA NTRS2018

Comparison of Iced Aerodynamic Measurements on a Swept Wing from Two Wind Tunnels

Artificial ice shapes of various geometric fidelity were tested on a wing model based on the Common Research Model. Low Reynolds number tests were conducted at Wichita State University's Beech Memorial Wind Tunnel, and high Reynolds number tests were conducted at ONERA's F1 wind tunnel. The aerodynamic performance data from the two facilities were compared at matched or similar Reynolds and Mach number to ensure that the results and trends observed at low Reynolds number could be applied and continued to high Reynolds number. For both clean and iced configurations, the data from Wichita State University and F1 agreed well at matched or similar Reynolds and Mach numbers. The lift and pitching moment curves agreed very well for most configurations. There appeared to be 0.2-0.3deg offset in the angle of attack between the Wichita State University and F1 data, possibly due to different flow angularities in the test sections of the two facilities. There was also an offset in the drag values between the two facilities from an unknown cause. Overall, the data compared very well between the low Reynolds number test at Wichita State University tunnel and the high Reynolds number test at F1. This indicated that data from the low Reynolds number tests could be used to understand iced-swept-wing aerodynamics at high Reynolds number.

Federal Aviation Administration↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effect of Geometric Fidelity on the Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Scalloped Ice Accretion

The effect of geometric fidelity on the aerodynamics of a swept wing with a “scallop” ice shape was studied. Three geometric fidelity versions of the ice shape were studied. The High Fidelity ice shape maintained all of the highly 3D features of the scallop shape. The 3D Smooth ice shape was smoothly lofted over the High Fidelity shape in order to eliminate all of the locally 3D feature. The third ice shape was the 3D Smooth ice shape with roughness grit attached to the surface. The two 3D Smooth versions of the ice shape exhibited a flowfield characterized by a leading edge separation bubble that rolled into spanwise running vortex. The surface pressure data showed classic leading edge separation bubbles that are observed on 2D airfoils with leading edge horn ice shapes. The High Fidelity ice shape exhibited a flowfield characterized by streamwise vortices that formed downstream of the ice shape. The streamwise vortices observed downstream of the High Fidelity ice shape appeared to reduce the size of the separation suction peak observed downstream of the 3D Smooth ice shapes. This reduced the lift for the High Fidelity ice shape, when compared to the 3D Smooth ice shapes. However, these streamwise vortices may have allowed the flow to remain attached longer and slightly increased the stall angle of attack, even though the maximum lift was lower.

Aircraft icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Icing Update

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aircraft Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Large-Drop Ice Accretion Test Results for a Large Scale Swept Wing Model

In-flight icing is an important consideration that affects aircraft design, performance and safety. Newer regulations combined with increasing demand to reduce fuel burn, emissions and noise are driving a need for improvements in icing simulation capability. To that end, this paper presents the results of ice accretion testing conducted in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel on a large swept wing section typical of a modern commercial transport. The model was based upon a section of the Common Research Model wing at the 64% semispan station with a streamwise chord length of 136 in. The test conditions were developed with an icing scaling analysis to generate similar conditions for a small MVD = 25 μm and a large MVD = 110 μm. A series of tests were conducted over a range of total temperature from -23.8 ˚C to -1.4 ˚C with all other conditions held constant. The results for the small MVD cloud conditions were consistent with previous work and showed the changing ice morphology from rime ice at colder temperatures to highly 3D scallop ice in the range of -8.7 ˚C to -3.8 ˚C. The results for the large MVD cloud conditions exhibited some differences in the ice accretion morphology from the small MVD conditions. Scallop-like ice features were observed at total temperature of -3.8˚C. The large MVD ice accretion at lower temperatures tended to be smoother than the corresponding ice accretion for small MVD. The thickness of the main ice shape tended to be larger for the small MVD conditions compared to the corresponding large MVD ice shape while the latter had more ice farther downstream. The measured ice mass was approximately equal between the corresponding small and large MVD ice shapes up to a freezing fraction of 0.6. For higher freezing fraction, the large MVD ice shapes weighed more. Cloud MVD variation from 50 μm to 230 μm while holding the scaling parameters constant resulted in very minor differences in the ice shapes, mostly in the upper and lower surface chordwise extents. Ice volume was computed from 3D scan data and used to calculate a ratio of ice mass to volume. The resulting values were in the range of 240 to 455 Kg/m3. While this is consistent with analogous values previously reported in the literature, more data are needed to determine a specific trend in this ratio as a function of freezing fraction and the corresponding governing physical phenomena. This work has resulted in a significant experimental database of ice accretion for small and large MVD conditions applicable to large-scale swept wings.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Truncated Swept Wing Models

A research program was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of icing tunnel hybrid model design. A hybrid design is where the full-scale leading edge of a wing section is maintained only to a certain percentage of the local chord, while the aft section of the model is redesigned into a shortened or truncated planform. Ice shape geometries on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of the swept CRM65 wing model were obtained in NASA Icing Research Tunnel and compared. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the ice shapes compared well. On the main part of the ice shape, the hybrid model had larger chordwise extent, resulting in wider ice shape. For the scallop ice shapes, the ice shape heights at attachment line location were identical. For conditions that produced rime shape, hybrid model ice shapes were larger overall, even at the attachment line location. The only location where there was more ice on the full chord model was on the lower surface, downstream of where the hybrid model no longer had full-scale leading edge. For the test conditions where ice mass measurements were acquired for both models, the full-chord models had 11-22% less ice mass than on the hybrid wing. These differences were larger and opposite of those predicted from LEWICE 3D ice prediction calculations. Further investigation is needed in order determine the cause of the differences between the full-chord and hybrid models.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Icing Update

This presentation provides a summary of NASA icing research activities with the focus on new developments and plans over the previous six months. Research highlights are provided from various NASA efforts.

Aircraft Icing, Flight Safety, Ice Accretion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aircraft Icing Analysis of Alternatives

This paper provides a description of a recent comprehensive Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for icing research. A team of NASA icing subject matter experts (SMEs) was assembled from NASA’s Glenn and Langley Research Centers, which began by gathering inputs from icing stakeholders in industry, Government, and academia. Those inputs, which were grouped into a number of themes, were used by the SMEs to identify needed icing technical elements. Each of these high-level technical elements included the icing physics, modeling capabilities, and experimental capabilities needed to address a particular element. A multivariable analysis technique called TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions) was then applied to prioritize the technical elements for several potential future realities. A large number of icing research needs were identified and analyzed to determine the highest priorities for NASA key focus areas and those that will endure into the future. The primary outcome of the AoA is the identification of legacy and newly identified capability areas in priority order to guide future investment.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aircraft Icing Analysis of Alternatives

Icing, Rotorcraft↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additional Comparison of Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Truncated Swept Wing Models from January 2022

A research program was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of icing tunnel hybrid model design. A hybrid design is where the full-scale leading edge of a wing section is maintained only to a certain percentage of the local chord, while the aft section of the model is redesigned into a shortened or truncated planform. An initial study was conducted in 2020 where the ice shape geometries on a full-chord length version of the swept CRM65 wing model were compared to those from the hybrid version of CRM65 that were obtained in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel in 2015. The results were reported in a 2021 paper. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the ice shapes compared well. However, the ice shapes from the full-chord model were generally slightly smaller than those from the hybrid model. A follow-on test was conducted in 2022 and obtained ice shapes on both full-chord and hybrid wing models during the same test campaign to eliminate the differences in the tunnel spray nozzle configuration and calibration as a cause for the differences observed during the previous investigation. The ice shapes obtained on the full-chord model compared much better to those obtained on the hybrid model during the 2022 test, with nearly identical cross sections and ice mass values generally within 5%.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simulated Ice Shapes on the High Lift Common Research Model Using LEWICE3D

Computational icing tools consist of predicting two distinct problems, the dry air aerodynamics around the iced or uniced vehicle and the accretion of ice due to inclement weather. A desire exists to advance these tools such that they can be reliably used earlier in the design process to limit the need for more costly flight and wind tunnel testing. To achieve these goals the computational tools need to be benchmarked and validated against high quality experimental data sets to raise the software’s Technology Readiness Level. An ongoing collaborative effort between NASA and Boeing Commercial Airplanes is focused on obtaining this required experimental data and subsequently benchmarking and/or validating the tools that predict the aerodynamics around the iced and uniced vehicle. Currently the scope of this effort is focused on the usage of simulated ice shapes to be representative of the iced vehicle. This presentation discusses the generation of those simulated ice shapes.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additional Large-Drop Ice Accretion Test Results for a Large Scale Swept Wing Section from January 2022

In-flight icing is an important consideration that affects aircraft design, performance, certification and safety. Newer regulations combined with increasing demand to reduce fuel burn, emissions and noise are driving a need for improvements in icing simulation capability. To that end, this paper presents the results of additional ice accretion testing conducted in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel in January 2022 with a large swept wing section typical of a modern commercial transport. The model was based upon a section of the Common Research Model wing at the 64% semispan station with a streamwise chord length of 136 in. The test conditions were developed with an icing scaling analysis to generate similar conditions for a small median volumetric diameter (MVD) = 25 μm cloud and a large MVD = 110 μm cloud. A series of tests were conducted over a range of total temperature from -23.8 ˚C to -1.4 ˚C with all other conditions held constant. Another series of tests explored cloud MVD variations from 50 μm to 230 μm while holding constant certain scaling parameters. The variation in ice mass and scanned ice volume across repeat conditions was approximately 50% lower than the uncertainty in the cloud MVD and liquid water content. The measured ice mass and volume calculated from the 3D scans were used to compute the mass to volume ratio that is sometimes referred to as ice density or void fraction. When the ice volume based on the ice shape maximum combined cross section was used to determine this ratio, the resulting values were in the range of 240 to 455 kg/m3. This is consistent with analogous values previously reported in the literature. The ice shape mass and volume increased with MVD from 50 to 230 μm at fixed values of the scaling parameters. The ice mass to volume ratio was approximately constant for all of the cases which showed that the accreted mass and volume increased at approximately the same rate. These results demonstrate the significance of cloud MVD on ice shape mass and volume.

Ice accretion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additional Comparison of Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Truncated Swept Wing Models from January 2022

A research program was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of icing tunnel hybrid model design. A hybrid design is where the full-scale leading edge of a wing section is maintained only to a certain percentage of the local chord, while the aft section of the model is redesigned into a shortened or truncated planform. An initial study was conducted in 2020 where the ice shape geometries on a full-chord length version of the swept CRM65 wing model were compared to those from the hybrid version of CRM65 that were obtained in NASA Icing Research Tunnel in 2015. The results were reported in a 2021 paper. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the ice shapes compared well. However, the ice shapes from the full-chord model were generally slightly smaller than those from the hybrid model. A follow-on test was conducted in 2022 and obtained ice shapes on both full-chord and hybrid wing models during the same test campaign to eliminate the differences in the tunnel configuration as a cause for the differences observed during the previous investigation. The ice shapes obtained on the full-chord model compared much better to those obtained on the hybrid model during the 2022 test, with nearly identical cross sections and ice mass values generally within 5%.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Icing Update

This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: recently completed propeller icing test in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel; recently completed Icing Research Tunnel Capability Untilization Study; planning for propulsor icing research; and status of the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory.

Icing, Propellers, Scaling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024

This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024. The updates include the following topics: (1) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Icing, (2) High-Lift Common Research Model Icing (3) Adaptive Icing Tunnel (AIT), (4) Advanced Air Mobility Icing, (5) GlennICE, (6) List of NASA Icing papers/presentations from 2024 AIAA Aviation Conference.

Icing↗