Andrew S Thelen | Engineering Papers

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multifidelity Optimization with Transonic Flutter Constraints

This work considers static and dynamic aeroelastic optimization of a cantilevered platewing in transonic flow. Low- and high-fidelity aeroelastic predictions are fed into a standard trust region model management scheme in order to efficiently solve this expensive optimization problem with multifidelity methods. Differences in fidelity are entirely driven by different aerodynamic solvers: linear panel methods for the low-fidelity method, and inviscid CFD-based solvers for the high-fidelity response. The optimization problem utilizes shape, sizing, and trim variables to satisfy stress, trim, and flutter constraints, and is solved across a range of subsonic and transonic Mach numbers. The multifidelity method is able to provide a speed-up for all cases considered here, despite sizable inaccuracies in the low-fidelity response for transonic flows.

Bret K Stanford↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigations of an Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Problem with MPhys and FUN3D

High-fidelity aeroelastic optimization capabilities are becoming more common in recent years. In this field, researchers typically present results on the design problems of greatest interest to them. The lack of consistency with respect to baseline configurations, design variables, objectives and constraints, etc., makes it difficult to compare approaches and creates an obstacle for the community to work together to advance the state of the art. The High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Working Group has been established to create and study a series of benchmark aeroelastic optimization problems that the community can utilize to compare methods on the same optimization problem. This paper presents optimization results from NASA Langley Research Center for the first benchmark case of this series with analysis based on MPhys, a multiphysics library for OpenMDAO, and FUN3D, an unstructured computational fluid dynamics suite of tools. For the optimization case presented, it is demonstrated that a progression of increasing aerodynamic model fidelity reduces the wall time required to complete the optimization.

Aeroelasticity↗