Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Andrew Patterson

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew Patterson.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

On Hermite Interpolation using Bernstein Polynomials for Trajectory Generation

This work presents a solution to the two-point Hermite interpolation problem using Bernstein polynomials. The Hermite interpolation problem is of particular interest in aerospace applications where boundary conditions for trajectories often specify derivative constraints. In the examples shown, a trajectory will be generated between an initial condition and a final condition. For example, a trajectory is generated that connects an aircraft’s current position and velocity with a point on the runway at a desired landing velocity. The numerical stability of the proposed algorithms is analyzed empirically.

Bezier curves↗
NASA NTRS2023

A Framework for Evaluating Distributed Electric Propulsion on the SUSAN Electrofan Aircraft

This work presents a framework for evaluating models and algorithms for Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) on the SUSAN Electrofan Aircraft. Throughout the development of the SUSAN aircraft, the performance of various configurations of the aircraft will need to be analyzed. However, the static behavior alone is not sufficient to describe the performance of these configurations. Therefore, simulation with fully integrated subsystem models is required. The proposed framework considers the vehicle aerodynamic, propulsion, and control subsystems. The presented framework automatically generates control laws for any vehicle configuration in response to changes in these subsystems. To compare these different vehicle configurations, various time and frequency domain performance metrics are compared. Three different system modifications are used as cases to evaluate this framework. The first modification integrates the propulsion control system with the flight controller to enable differential thrust without stalling the main engine. This evaluation case is used to validate the framework for aircraft configurations with coupled subsystems. The second modification compares the effect of the vertical tail size on open and closed loop performance. This evaluation case is used to validate the framework for controlling different configurations and tuning towards comparable closed loop performance despite changes to the aircraft's aerodynamic model. The third modification implements two different control allocation schemes. This evaluation case demonstrates the framework's ability to evaluate allocation modifications needed to take advantage of DEP. The first evaluation case is used to show that controller integration enables differential thrust, improving realized wingfan bandwidth by up to 40\% in simulation. The second evaluation case demonstrates that the framework can stabilize the reduced tail size aircraft with closed loop control. The third evaluation case demonstrates that a pseudoinverse control allocation scheme improves lateral velocity settling time by approximately 17~seconds over a symmetric-thrust allocation. These cases show that the framework is useful for evaluating the performance of integrated system designs, enabling analyses of new models and algorithms for the SUSAN distributed electric propulsion vehicle.

Nicholas C Ogden↗
NASA NTRS2020

Controller Design for Propeller Phase Synchronization with Aeroacoustic Performance Metrics

Active noise reduction using phase control takes advantage of the propellers used in a distributed electric air vehicle by treating each propeller as an independent acoustic source. These acoustic sources can destructively interfere if the propellers are synchronized. With this method, the radiated sound power around the vehicle can be reduced. The purpose of this paper is to design a controller that regulates propeller positions to reduce the radiated sound power through destructive interference and to demonstrate the performance of the controller through acoustic testing. There are two control requirements for reducing the sound pressure level considered in this paper. The first is accurately regulating the difference between the propeller azimuthal blade positions (phase) relative to their neighbors. By changing the phase at the source, we can control the phase of the sound wave at an arrival position to create destructive interference. The second consideration is maintaining high coherence between the two propeller sources. To achieve significant attenuation, the controller needs to regulate phase error and suppress sources of incoherence. Performance is demonstrated through sound recordings performed in the NASA Langley Structural Acoustic Loads and Transmission (SALT) anechoic chamber. We show that the controller is capable of reducing sound pressure level at a given observer location by 17 dB at the blade passage frequency and that this method can reduce the radiated sound power by 6 dB at the blade passage frequency.

Andrew Patterson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trajectory Generation for Distributed Electric Propulsion Vehicles with Propeller Synchronization

In this paper, we propose a method for generating dynamically feasible trajectories for an acoustically aware vehicle with propeller phase control. The trajectory generation procedure allows both propeller phase control and navigation objectives to be considered simultaneously. The presented method is demonstrated where the mission objectives are given as a desired position and phase trajectory. From these trajectories, the full desired state of the vehicle is calculated. Furthermore, the control inputs that realize the desired mission objectives are computed. The acoustic performance for the given trajectory is estimated in terms of sound pressure level as a function of tracking performance. The method is demonstrated in simulation, where the vehicle must navigate through an urban environment with both spatial and acoustic constraints. In the presented scenario, the vehicle must follow a given flight path, and can only reduce sound pressure level by changing the propeller phase targets.

Acoustically-aware vehicle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Propeller Source Noise Spheres

In this work, several neural network function approximations are compared for inter- polating, storing, and sampling acoustic source spheres with applications to propeller noise estimation. These methods are compared using an acoustic model of the three bladed GL-10 propeller at different flight conditions, with training data generated using NASA’s ANOPP-PAS module. The source spheres used to train the networks capture the tonal propeller noise due to both the blade thickness and loading. This tonal noise prediction method allows the vehicle noise to be estimated for auralization and acoustic control. Three radial basis function neural network architectures are compared in this work. The first two networks directly estimate the parameters of the source sphere at different flight conditions but differ in the number of layers used. The third network estimates the parameters of the source sphere using a weighted combination of spherical basis functions. These networks are trained on numerically generated source spheres, with operating points given in terms of the propeller rotation rate, freestream speed, and propeller angle of attack. The performance of the neural network is determined using a validation dataset of withheld data points. This performance is quantified in terms of the approximation error, training time, and sample time. The third network, which estimates the weights of the spherical basis functions, performs the best in both average and maximum approximation errors in all cases. This network’s worst case performance is 5.6 % relative dif- ference of a model parameter associated with acoustic pressure. The direct estimation network with a single layer has the worst approximation error in all cases. Additionally, the spherically defined network has the slowest sample time at 0.05 seconds per thousand points. Both direct estimation methods produce a thousand sample points in approximately 0.001 seconds.

Acoustics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An L1 Adaptive Control Augmentation for a Lift Plus-Cruise Vehicle

This paper presents anL1adaptive control augmentation for a Lift-Plus-Cruise (L+C)vehicle. This class of vehicles operates in three flight modes with different dynamic behavior: vertical, transition, and forward flight. A robust uniform controller is used as a baseline to stabilize the system throughout these flight modes. The uniform controller is a linear control law designed around trim conditions of the aircraft and includes control allocation to achieve the desired forces and moments on the vehicle. TheL1control augmentation is designed for each of these trim conditions to compensate for the nonlinear time- and state-dependent uncertainties in the vehicle dynamics. The augmented control output is then added to the desired force and moment commands on the vehicle. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of control augmentation for reducing the effects of unmodeled dynamics, reduced actuator effectiveness, and time-dependent disturbances. Effectiveness is demonstrated through tracking error metrics.

Andrew Patterson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Combined Bernstein Polynomial, Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance, Differential Dynamic Programming for Trajectory Replanning and Collision Avoidance for UAM Vehicles

This paper presents an integration of Differential Dynamic Programming (DDP) with the Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance (ORCA) algorithm as the basis for a new algorithm, titled Combined Bernstein Polynomial Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance DDP (COBRA-DDP), for trajectory replanning and collision avoidance for Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicles. State-constrained variants of DDP provide the ability to plan trajectories while avoiding obstacles, but these methods require a large increase in computational time per iteration which hinders the overall speed of the algorithm. ORCA utilizes simplified dynamics to recognize potential collisions along a trajectory and provides an optimal velocity for the avoidance of multiple vehicles. These velocity commands, however, may not result in a dynamically feasible trajectory for DDP to plan around. As such, a Bernstein polynomial curve that considers the general dynamic constraints of the vehicle is generated to approximate a trajectory based on the velocity commands. COBRA-DDP optimizes this suggested trajectory via unconstrained DDP to provide a dynamically feasible trajectory that provides collision avoidance. This new trajectory can be applied to the vehicle or used to warm start the state constrained DDP algorithms to decrease computation time. Its benefits and effectiveness of the algorithm are demonstrated on a UAM Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) vehicle simulation with highly nonlinear dynamics.

Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Adaptive Optimization for System Performance and Combined Bernstein Polynomial, Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance, Differential Dynamic Programming for Trajectory Replanning and Collision Avoidance for UAM Vehicles

The emerging urban air mobility (UAM) sector in aerospace is driving development of unconventional multi-modal vehicle configurations and autonomous flight. The combination of multi-modal vehicle dynamics, complex environment, requirements to deal with flight contingencies in an efficient and safe manner, as well as necessity for precise trajectory following and performance, are the driving influence behind adaptive optimization for system performance. We are interested in trajectory optimization algorithm that would system parameter estimation and identifying the optimal switching time between modes of hybrid dynamical systems. This presentation discusses a parameterized optimal control trajectory optimization algorithm that is an extended and generalized version of Differential Dynamic Programming (DDP), titled Parameterized Differential Dynamic Programming (PDDP). DDP is an efficient trajectory optimization algorithm relying on second order approximations of a system’s dynamics and cost function and has recently been applied to optimize systems with time invariant parameters. Experiments are presented applying PDDP to solve model predictive control (MPC) and moving horizon estimation (MHE) tasks simultaneously. In particular, PDDP is used to determine the optimal transition point between flight regimes of a complex urban air mobility (UAM) class vehicle exhibiting multiple phases of flight and to identify and compensate for actuation faults.

optimization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reference Command Optimization for the Transition Flight Mode of a Lift plus Cruise Vehicle

Advanced air mobility mainly utilizes vehicles that are capable of vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) for the simplicity of operation and large-scale deployment. However, VTOL vehicles need specialized trajectory and command design for the transition phase, where the vehicles transition between rotor-borne flight and wing-borne flight. Since VTOL vehicles are commonly designed as over-actuated systems for redundancy, one challenge that arises is actuator ambiguity, where it is unclear how to uniquely command actuators for the VTOL vehicle to track a given trajectory. We propose a method to design optimal reference commands for the transition mode. By formulating an 𝑙 1 -norm cost function on the rotor thrusts of the vehicle, we can achieve economical operation of the rotors such that they only operate when necessary and efficiently utilize the aerodynamics to save energy from reduced rotor actuation. We validate our approach in simulations and show its benefit compared to the commonly used differential flatness-based method.

John L Bullock↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

COBRA-DDP: Trajectory Generation and Collision Avoidance Augmentations for eVTOL Vehicles

This paper presents a receding horizon model predictive control variation of the combined Bernstein polynomial optimal reciprocal collision avoidance (ORCA) differential dynamic programming (COBRA-DDP) algorithm for AAM vehicles. Collision avoidance in combination with effective trajectory replanning are expected to be core components of AAM vehicles operating within a crowded airspace. This environment necessitates the use of real-time trajectory planning algorithms that are capable of planning around large amounts of stationary and moving obstacles. Previous work on COBRA-DDP demonstrated the capability of the algorithm to produce dynamically feasible trajectories for AAM vehicles and general collision avoidance. This paper improves upon the previous work by increasing the number of stationary and moving obstacles, implementing a variation of COBRA-DDP that lends itself to real-time application. These advancements are demonstrated on a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) vehicle simulation with highly nonlinear vehicle dynamics.

COBRA-DDP↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

COBRA-DDP: Trajectory Generation and Collision Avoidance Augmentations for eVTOL Vehicles

This paper presents a receding horizon model predictive control variation of the combined Bernstein polynomial optimal reciprocal collision avoidance (ORCA) differential dynamic programming (COBRA-DDP) algorithm for AAM vehicles. Collision avoidance in combination with effective trajectory replanning are expected to be core components of AAM vehicles operating within a crowded airspace. This environment necessitates the use of real-time trajectory planning algorithms that are capable of planning around large amounts of stationary and moving obstacles. Previous work on COBRA-DDP demonstrated the capability of the algorithm to produce dynamically feasible trajectories for AAM vehicles and general collision avoidance. This paper improves upon the previous work by increasing the number of stationary and moving obstacles, implementing a variation of COBRA-DDP that lends itself to real-time application. These advancements are demonstrated on a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) vehicle simulation with highly nonlinear vehicle dynamics.

COBRA-DDP↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Autonomous Flight and Its Challenges

Aviation is undergoing a revolution and a paradigm change. New technologies are moving aviation towards on-demand transportation. To fully realize the promise of “anyone, anytime, anywhere” transportation, autonomy must play a key role. Our research team is focused on the intersection of new vehicle eVTOL configurations, popularly known as “air taxis”, and autonomous flight in complex urban environment. It has been widely recognized that dealing with contingencies, especially in safe, scalable and flexible way, is the most difficult challenge for autonomy. The presentation is intended to outline what we consider fundamental challenges and describe our current approaches. Moreover, we are working on establishing wide ranging collaborations to address these fundamental autonomy challenges in a relevant environment with real-world assumptions and constraints. Hence, we would like to take this opportunity to discuss open challenge problems with this research community.

autonomy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimal Control using Composite Bernstein Approximants

In this work, we present composite Bernstein polynomials as a direct collocation method for approximating optimal control problems. An analysis of the convergence properties of composite Bernstein polynomials is provided, and beneficial properties of composite Bernstein polynomials for the solution of optimal control problems are discussed. The efficacy of the proposed approximation method is demonstrated through a bang-bang example. Lastly, we apply this method to a motion planning problem, offering a practical solution that emphasizes the ability of this method to solve complex optimal control problems.

Gage MacLin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Traffic Prediction for Uncommunicative Aircraft in Terminal Airspace: Development Framework and Performance Evaluations

This paper presents an air traffic prediction algorithm that takes observations of an aircraft and classifies aircraft type, estimates the aircraft's intent to and method of joining an airport traffic pattern, and predicts the aircaft's future trajectory. To develop algorithms that enable autonomous aircraft to safely insert into un-towered traffic patterns, several challenges need to be addressed. These challenges range from traffic detection to sensor fusion to own-ship trajectory replanning. Critical to a trajectory replanning algorithm is information regarding the future behavior of all traffic aircraft in the operational environment. The presented traffic prediction algorithm generates this information using regular measurements of traffic aircraft position and velocity to classify the aircraft by speed-class, estimate how the aircraft will approach the runway, and construct a predicted trajectory to the runway including future positions and velocities at specific times. The predictions of the presented algorithm are the necessary inputs for any downstream traffic pattern sequencing and own-ship trajectory planning routines. The presented algorithm is benchmarked using approximately 300 randomized traffic trajectories, spanning four vehicle weight classes and eight traffic entry types. While the algorithm can process multiple traffic vehicles in the terminal area, there is no prediction of traffic-on-traffic interaction. Each traffic vehicle is processed separately.

John D McMinn↗