Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ade, Brian J.

Publications and source records attributed to Ade, Brian J..

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Simultaneous isotopic analysis of fission product Sr, Mo, and Ru in spent nuclear fuel particles by resonance ionization mass spectrometry

Abstract Fission product Sr, Mo, and Ru isotopes in six 10-μm particles of spent fuel from a pressurized water reactor were analyzed by resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS) and evaluated for utility in nuclear material characterization. Previous measurements on these same samples showed widely varying U, Pu, and Am isotopic compositions owing to the samples’ differing irradiation environments within the reactor. This is also seen in Mo and Ru isotopes, which have the added complication of exsolution from the UO 2 fuel matrix. This variability is a hindrance to interpreting data from a collection of particles with incomplete provenance since it is not always possible to assign particles to the same batch of fuel based on isotopic analyses alone. In contrast, the measured 90 Sr/ 88 Sr ratios were indistinguishable across all samples. Strontium isotopic analysis can therefore be used to connect samples with otherwise disparate isotopic compositions, allowing them to be grouped appropriately for interpretation. Strontium isotopic analysis also provides a robust chronometer for determining the time since fuel irradiation. Because of the very high sensitivity of RIMS, only a small fraction of material in each of the 10 μm samples was consumed, leaving the vast majority still available for other analyses.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Coolant Channel Design for Additively Manufactured Reactor Cores

Additive manufacturing (AM) methods are currently being explored for applications in nuclear reactors to make advanced reactors more efficient, safe, and reliable. The Transformational Challenge Reactor (TCR) program has explored AM for nuclear by designing a high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) using an AM silicon carbide fuel form with uranium nitride–tristructural isotropic fuel. In this study, we detail the design process for the TCR fuel form’s coolant channels using computational fluid dynamics models with conjugate heat transfer. Additionally, this work discusses how these models were interfaced with other design teams, project milestones, and the agile design method used to mature the reactor design. The methodology deployed was able to create a channel design with lower maximum fuel temperatures and thermal stresses in the fuel form over traditional channel designs that can be manufactured subtractively. These results were achieved with only small manufacturing penalties. Results are discussed and presented on lessons learned for designing AM components for nuclear reactors. Finally, areas of opportunity are discussed for advanced design tools to further automate design activities and optimize reactors with fewer built-in assumptions.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Ordered Particle Packing in Dense TRISO/SiC Fuel Elements and Preliminary Assessment of Neutronic and Thermomechanical Characteristics

Detailed analysis of the particle distribution in Transformational Challenge Reactor fuel elements indicates that particle packing is not random; instead, it follows a relatively ordered structure near fuel element surfaces. Discrete particle neutronic simulations indicate that the core reactivity is not impacted when assuming homogenization of particles with the silicon carbide matrix. However, the neutronic power distribution resulting from the ordered packing structure indicates that the highest-power particles reside at the top and bottom of the fuel elements and nearest the YH 1.85 moderator rods. The power distribution results were applied to thermo-mechanical simulations using mesh-based power distributions. Previous results indicated high stress at the bottom of the fuel element, where packing is most ordered. Additionally, to reduce this stress concentration, additively manufactured protrusions were added to the bottom of a test fuel element to disrupt dense particle packing. These protrusions reduced the overall power peaking, but the thermomechanical simulations did not indicate a significant change in the fuel element’s maximum stress or failure probability.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Conceptual Design of the Transformational Challenge Reactor

The Transformational Challenge Reactor is a 3-MW(thermal) helium-cooled experimental nuclear reactor designed using an additive manufacturing–informed agile design process. This design process leverages rapid prototyping and advanced materials from emerging additive manufacturing technologies, key characteristics that enable rapid design maturation. The resulting core design incorporates a blend of advanced reactor technologies into an intermediate-spectrum microreactor, including conventionally manufactured tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel particles in an advanced manufactured SiC fuel element and a solid yttrium hydride moderator encapsulated in steel. Matured during the design effort, these technologies are incorporated with additively manufactured steel support and fluidic structures to form a 75-cm-outer-diameter cylindrical active core region. Below and above the active core region are axial SiC reflectors, which are housed inside the reactor pressure vessel. The reactor is controlled with an annular shroud actuated external to the pressure vessel in the gap between the pressure vessel and a steel radial reflector. A safety rod is at the center of the core to shut down the reactor when necessary. Helium pressurized at 5 MPa is forced into the pressure vessel below the core and around the core to the top plenum before it is forced down through the axial reflectors and the active core region. The primary pressurized helium loop is operated up to 500°C and includes the pressure vessel, the circulator, and the hot side of a helium-to-air heat exchanger. The secondary loop rejects all heat from the primary loop to ambient air through a heat exchanger. A vented temporary confinement building contains the entire primary loop, with penetrations for a stack, cooling, and the secondary ambient air loop. Finally, this is the first advanced nuclear microreactor designed using additive manufacturing technologies, demonstrating their applicability in an accelerated advanced design process.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Plutonium Production Reactor Progression Problems: Magnox Neutronics Benchmarks

The goal of this document is to provide a set of comprehensive benchmarking neutronics problems for gas-cooled, graphite-moderated reactors. The problems are designed to be representative problems that increase in complexity to test performance of various codes. For the simulation of the benchmarking problems, the Shift Monte Carlo code and MPACT deterministic code are chosen because of their state-of-the-art capabilities, which are optimized for various reactor designs. Because these codes have been developed primarily for light water reactor applications, their application to graphite-moderated, gas-cooled reactors has not been extensively explored. This report attempts to evaluate benchmarks for a Magnox-style reactor, one that is graphite-moderated and gas-cooled. Parameters that are calculated and presented in this benchmark include the eigenvalue, peaking factors, and isotope concentrations. Results show good agreement between Shift and MPACT, and demonstrate the capability of MPACT to model graphite-moderated systems well.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hexagonal Geometries in MPACT

The MPACT code is a high-fidelity light-water reactor analysis code using whole-core pin-resolved neutron transport calculations on modern parallel-computing hardware. MPACT uses the 2D/1D method to solve 3D neutron transport problems by decomposing the problem into a stack of 2D slices, each of which is solved independently using the method of characteristics (MOC). The slices are then coupled axially using the P3 nodal expansion method (NEM-P3) for the 1D axial calculations. MPACT also employs the coarse mesh finite difference (CMFD) method to accelerate calculations. This manuscript details work supporting advanced reactor designs using hexagonal pins and hexagonal assemblies such as the VVER-1000. If performed correctly, MOC is geometry agnostic. However, MPACT previously had optimizations in place for Cartesian geometries, specifically in the modularization and current calculations. Sections 2 and 3 detail the changes made to MPACT to support MOC and CMFD calculations on hexagonal geometries. Section 4 reports results demonstrating solution consistency for problems run with and without CMFD acceleration, results demonstrating solution consistency when run in serial and parallel, and pincell results using the Monte Carlo code, McCard’s benchmark results.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗