Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Abboushi, Belal K.

Publications and source records attributed to Abboushi, Belal K..

The Position Index of Overhead LED Sources Under Different Spectral Power Distributions and Background Luminances

The position index was developed by Luckiesh and Guth in 1949 and is widely used in discomfort glare models to account for the position of the glare source when predicting the presence and magnitude of visual discomfort. The applicability of this index to modern LED sources has not been evaluated; however, it is of concern due to potentially higher luminance levels of LEDs compared to the sources used by Luckiesh and Guth. Furthermore, the position index of overhead sources beyond 60° above the line of sight has not been quantified. An experiment was conducted using a hemispherical apparatus with LED sources. The position of the light source, background luminance, the spectral power distribution, and anchor (starting luminance level before adjustment) were varied and two procedures were used to determine the position index of these sources. Data from 29 participants indicate that overhead sources located 60° or 80° above the line of sight were detectable and their position index can be quantified. The position index values were found to be higher than those reported in previous studies, suggesting that anchor bias and the small luminance range in previous studies likely influenced their position index values. No differences were found in position index values by spectral power distribution, background luminance, participant age group, or eyeglass wearing. In conclusion, the position index values reported in this study account for range and anchor bias, providing a better estimate that should be incorporated into discomfort glare models.

Discomfort glare↗

Comparison of effectiveness and energy use of airborne pathogen mitigation measures to meet clean air targets in a prototypical office building

Organizations such as ASHRAE and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have proposed guidelines for controlling infectious aerosols in buildings, which can be met through measures such as modified operation of the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system or incorporating air-cleaning technologies. However, more research is needed to understand the trade-offs between health, energy, and comfort aspects when designing measures for these guidelines. To address this gap, this paper presents an analysis using new models for air-cleaning technologies, including in-duct and in-room germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) systems and portable air cleaners (PACs). These models are incorporated into an existing prototypical office building model and six measures are designed to meet ASHRAE Standard 241 and CDC clean air targets: MERV 13 HVAC filtration, maximum outdoor air supplied to the building, PACs, and in-duct, upper-room, and whole-room GUV. The measures are simulated for an office building in a cool and humid climate compared against a baseline simulation using MERV 8 filtration. The results show that all measures, except for the maximum outdoor air case, can meet the ASHRAE 241 standard without significant impacts on energy or comfort. The HVAC system measures were not able to meet the CDC target with the default system sizing and lead to significant energy increases, while the in-room measures were able to meet the CDC target with small impacts on energy consumption. Finally, this paper consolidates the simulation findings and provides practical guidance for building operators to meet clean air targets while limiting energy and comfort impacts.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Automatic Receptacle Controls: Evaluating the clarity of receptacle markings

Plug loads and the electric loads of devices plugged into receptacles in commercial buildings play a significant and growing role in commercial buildings. Because plug loads are portable and are often placed in the building by the occupants, they are a challenging load to manage. This report summarizes an analysis of commercially available automatic receptacle controls (ARCs). As a part of this study, generic versions of ARCs were presented to a general user audience via an online survey, wherein survey respondents indicated which markings more clearly indicated that the receptacle was controlled. A total of 210 responses were collected and included in the analysis presented in this report. The results showed that receptacles with high-contrast markings were consistently clearer and more evident to the users than low-contrast markings. The survey responses also revealed that receptacles with a border drawn around each controlled receptacle were clearer and distinct to the users compared to other markings. These results led to the conclusion that for energy saving technology to be effective, consistent and easy to understand markings are necessary.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Determining critical points to control electric lighting to meet circadian lighting requirements and minimize energy use

Designing electric lighting systems to meet circadian lighting requirements may raise light levels and consequently energy use compared to existing practices. To reduce energy use, electric lighting can be controlled to be dimmed or turned off when sufficient daylight levels are available in space. This requires input from one or a few critical measurement points. However, it is unclear how critical points can be determined to ensure that all occupants receive the needed light levels while reducing electric lighting energy. This paper discusses three approaches for selecting critical points and utilizes annual daylight simulations modified to account for sky spectra, and coupled with spectral electric lighting simulations. Among the three evaluated approaches, the use of continuous daylight autonomy (modified to use EML measured at eye positions) is helpful for estimating electric lighting energy for dimmable electric lighting systems, and for identifying energy-saving strategies.

Abboushi, Belal K.↗

What to measure and report in studies of discomfort from glare for pedestrian applications

We report in outdoor environments after dark, pedestrians may experience discomfort from glare caused by lighting. Several models to predict discomfort from glare have been proposed or extended for pedestrian applications; these models use different luminous and geometrical quantities to predict discomfort. Consistent measurements and reporting in studies of discomfort from glare are important for identifying best performing models; however, previous studies proposing a new model tended to only report the performance of the new model and its quantities. This practice makes it difficult to evaluate how a new model performs compared to other existing models. To promote more consistent and complete reporting, this research note proposes measuring and reporting all relevant quantities that are used in existing models. This can make it easier for researchers to use a study dataset to compare the performance of several models or to combine datasets from several studies to address between-study variance.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Correspondence: A new two-step approach for evaluating discomfort from glare

While there are several rating scales commonly used to measure discomfort from glare sources, there are issues in the design of these scales that lead to noise in the data and in turn contribute to continued disagreement about the prediction of discomfort. Problems with rating scales include uncertainty about the meaning of magnitude descriptors, limited analysis opportunities available for some rating scales, inconsistent labelling of scale descriptors between studies that are using the “same” scale, the inability for subjects to indicate the lack of discomfort, and that it is uncertain where lies the borderline between comfort and discomfort. This paper proposes a new two-step scale for rating discomfort from glare.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Examining Perceptual Luminance Uniformity of Simulated Luminaire Patterns

Luminaire luminance uniformity is an important aspect that can affect perceived lighting quality, discomfort glare, and efficacy. While several metrics have been proposed to characterize luminance uniformity, previous studies have shown that current metrics such as Max:Min or Avg:Min luminance ratios can be insensitive to important differences in luminance gradient that may affect perceived uniformity. In an attempt to resolve this issue, previous studies incorporated a contrast sensitivity function for the human eye based on spatial frequency, such as in the UHVS metric; however, this metric has not been comprehensively studied in relation to perceived uniformity ratings. The study presented in this paper aimed to examine the relationship between the UHVS metric and perceived uniformity ratings. Specifically, the study used a web-based questionnaire that presented simulated luminance patterns and asked participants to assess uniformity using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Responses were collected and analyzed from 94 participants. The results showed a significant correlation and relationship between the UHVS metric and perceived uniformity. However, comparisons between patterns that had similar UHVS and between patterns that had larger differences in UHVS did not yield consistent results. These results suggest that the UHVS metric might be used for general guidance but may warrant further studies to better understand its sensitivity and improve its alignment with perceived uniformity ratings.

Abboushi, Belal K.↗

The Effect of Spectral Resolution of Light Sources on Photopic and a-opic Quantities

There is a growing interest in including light source spectrum in advanced lighting software tools and simulations. Given that traditional lighting software tools have been used primarily for calculating photometric quantities, their simplifying assumptions may not be suitable for calculating other a-opic quantities. Commonly used simulation tools use three values to represent the three primary colors (red, green, and blue), but others have expanded the number of bands (i.e., the spectral resolution) to 9, 27, or 81 in an attempt to more accurately represent variations in light source spectrum and downstream spectrally-derived quantities. It remains unclear, however, to what extent spectral resolution affects calculated quantities. To address this gap, a numerical analysis was completed using a large spectral power distribution database (n = 1,302 light sources). Calculated illuminance, a-opic irradiance, luminous efficacy of radiation (LER), melanopic efficacy of radiation (MER), and melanopic to photopic (M/P) ratio were compared for spectral resolutions of 3 and 9 bands compared to a baseline of 81 bands. Across all examined lighting quantities, considerable errors—a mean absolute percent error of 18.4%—were found when using 3 band calculations. These were reduced to 4% for 9 band calculations. The errors varied by metric and light source type. The results suggest that the use of 9 bands can more accurately characterize performance of different light source types across a range of metrics compared to using 3 bands.

Abboushi, Belal K.↗

Evolving theories of change: Rethinking of the effects of office lighting on occupants

This paper proposes an overall theory of change that relates lighting in offices to a holistic view of human responses that contribute to the well-being of office workers. The theoretical model considers how variations in the four fundamental lighting attributes affect visual performance, visual environment, and non-image forming responses. It moves beyond these lighting to address how external factors that are may mediate the effects on the desired lighting related outcomes, which in turn determine the final impact on occupants. The model builds on prior conceptual models of lighting effects and informs design and research planning for office lighting. Ultimately, properly supported task performance can increase occupant motivation but by itself may not achieve the holistic desired impact. Lighting attributes that support a pleasant visual environment and appropriate non-image forming responses can more fully contribute to an occupant’s mood and overall well-being.

Collier, Jessica M.↗

Opinion: Lighting Research During and After the Pandemic

For many lighting researchers, the recent restrictions related to COVID-19 have paused most in-person laboratory or field experiments. In certain countries, regulatory institutions have allowed such experiments to resume but issued safety recommendations like pre-checking participants for disease symptoms and excluding those that are especially vulnerable. To avoid potential complications and delays, researchers are likely to resort to other research designs that enable remote research — eliminating the need for the experimenter and subjects to be in the same room. While unanticipated, this shift to remote research methods is an opportunity to revisit and further develop remote experimental techniques, which can have beneficial long-lasting implications on lighting research during and after the pandemic. Perhaps the most common type of remote research is online experiments; which can greatly benefit from improved techniques to allow for greater control or characterization of experimental conditions, like those proposed by Villa and Labayrade . These techniques require validation specific to the type of response collected and context, e.g. space type and attributes. New research techniques continue to emerge and will enable remote collection of objective measures such as gaze direction and high dynamic range images (HDRIs) without specialized equipment. In fact, many of these methods and techniques are commonly used in other disciplines, like vision science and psychology, and can be adapted for lighting research. Not all lighting studies can be conducted online, but in the age of ubiquitous and connected technologies, there is a largely missed opportunity to utilize crowdsourced responses to lighting conditions in real environments where people live and go about their daily lives without the research being limited to a certain time and laboratory locations. For instance, outdoor street luminaires can be rated by passersby using ecological momentary assessments on mobile phones. While this approach does not provide laboratory-level control over experimental conditions, it can provide more contextual responses resulting from ‘normal’ dynamic gaze, behavior, and interactions. Further, it can also reduce bias related to the experimental setting. Further development of remote research methods and their use in lighting research can improve the quality of lighting research. Given that sample sizes in most lighting research are relatively small, remote research can substantially increase sample sizes, reduce research costs, and shorten study duration, all while reducing interaction between experimenter and subjects. Another benefit is reaching a wider audience and including under-represented individuals who typically are not reachable using common recruitment methods. The pandemic has set back our plans for in-lab experiments, but can it inspire us to think of new and creative ways to expand lighting research?

Abboushi, Belal K.↗

THE CASE FOR MULTICRITERIA ANNUAL SUNLIGHT EXPOSURE GUIDELINES

This paper explored the effects of the current Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE1000 lux, 250 hours) requirements on energy consumption and thermal comfort of an office space in five cities representing different U.S. climates. Specifically, the goal was to quantify the extent to which the current ASE metric requirements may be adjusted allowing for more/ less annual sunlight exposure to address climatic differences, energy, and thermal comfort criteria. A south-facing perimeter office space was simulated in the five climates to assess differences in energy and thermal comfort between the current ASE requirements and best-case scenarios. The results highlight the need to incorporate thermal comfort and energy as primary criteria informing target ASE requirements and guidelines. Lastly, the paper discusses research pathways to help develop multi-criteria ASE guidelines.

Abboushi, Belal K.↗

Mind the Gap: Building Simulation in the Architectural Design Studio

Building modelling and simulation approaches are increasingly being utilized in architectural design studios to guide and inform the design process and offer evidence-based feedback on proposed building performance. The development of intuitive and simplified simulation interfaces has greatly contributed to achieving this integration. One aspect that is often overlooked is the workflow that governs and regulates integrated design, which can have significant impacts on final design outcomes. Currently there are numerous software packages available for building performance simulations. This makes it challenging to select an appropriate tool that provides accurate results yet allows a designer to make informed architectural decisions with a designer-friendly interface. Furthermore, workflows to incorporate simulations into the design process proved to highly impact student’s project design integration. Yet, it is not clear what type of workflows are successful to achieve this goal, under what conditions, and/or for which building and site typologies. This paper addresses these issues by first reviewing three different workflows for integrating building performance simulation processes and highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Second, a comparative case study approach was employed to test three of the most common workflows in three different integrated design architectural studios at the senior and vertical studio levels as well as in two courses that run parallel and complementary to the design studios. The workflows, processes, and the resultant student projects were further analyzed based on criteria for better integrated design and architectural excellence as outlined in the American Institute of Architects Committee on the Environment (AIA COTE) Top 10 Student’s Competition. Third, to situate the pedagogical case studies’ results within a larger context, a survey of the AIA COTE Top 10 student competition award recipients over the last five years was conducted. The results are summarized in a pedagogical framework that outlines best strategies of the type of workflows, software, design process used, methods to achieve desired interaction between design process and analytical feedback, and metrics for educators to evaluate the success of this integration and their learning outcomes in the design studio. The goal is to help bridge the gap between the building design and simulation within the design studio’s creative process for more integrated design outcomes.

Elzeyadi, Ihab↗