Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

A Bollinger

Publications and source records attributed to A Bollinger.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2025

Functional Task Tests in Partial Gravity During Parabolic Flight

BACKGROUND Understanding how critical mission tasks are performed in partial gravity such as on the moon or Mars is necessary to define effective and comprehensive countermeasure strategies for preserving crew performance during exploration missions. We studied the performance of tasks such as standing, balancing, walking, and jumping during the partial gravity phases of parabolic flight. We hypothesized that the acute effects of partial gravity on vestibular, proprioceptive, and sensorimotor functions would negatively impact performance. METHODS Twelve subjects (6F, 6M; 40.2 ± 8.5 years) were tested over three flights of 30 parabolas each, including 10 parabolas at 0.25g, 10 parabolas at 0.5g, and 10 parabolas at 0.75g. Subjects also performed tests in 1g between parabolas. During the seat egress and walk task, subjects rose from a seated position and walked as quickly as possible straight ahead towards a cone (4 m distance), stepped over a 30 cm high obstacle, walked around the cone making a 180° left turn, returned to the chair, and sat down in the chair. Other tasks included a tandem stance on rails, jump down from a 30cm platform, recovery from fall (prone to stand), and limits of stability tasks. Data were collected using inertial measurement units (Opal V2, APDM, Portland, OR) worn on the head and trunk, heart rate monitors (Polar, Finland), and a force plate (Bertec, Columbus, OH). During the jump down and limits of stability tasks, falls were recorded if subjects took extra steps, lifted their heels/toes, or used their arms to recover balance. RESULTS Gravity level had a significant effect on performance, with the greatest changes from 1g tending to be at the 0.25g level (Table 1). Lower gravity levels were associated with increased times to complete the seat egress and walk task and the recovery from fall task, increased head-trunk coordination, decreased tandem stance rail balance times, decreased change in heart rate during the recovery from fall task, and increased cone of stability distance in the anterior-posterior direction. In addition, there were significantly more falls recorded at the lower gravity levels: 31 falls at 0.25g, 14 falls at 0.5g, 6 falls at 0.75g, and 6 falls at 1g. DISCUSSION These data suggest that there is a dose-response relationship between gravity level and functional task performance. The largest changes in performance were expected at the lowest gravity level (0.25g) because subjects would no longer be able to use the gravitational reference for the perception of upright. Understanding the extent of performance deficits informs the risks and design of countermeasures for exploration spaceflight missions.

T R Macaulay↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Functional Task Tests in Partial Gravity During Parabolic Flight

- Understanding how functional tasks are performed in partial gravity (partial-g) is necessary to define effective and comprehensive countermeasure strategies for preserving crew performance during exploration-class missions, such as on the Moon or Mars. - Changes in 1G performance metrics before (Pre) and after (Post) 6-month stays on the ISS and 70-day bed rest.

TR Macaulay↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Functional Task Tests in Partial Gravity During Parabolic Flight

BACKGROUND Understanding how critical mission tasks are performed in partial gravity such as on the moon or Mars is necessary to define effective and comprehensive countermeasure strategies for preserving crew performance during exploration missions. We studied the performance of tasks such as standing, walking, and jumping during the partial gravity phases of parabolic flight. We hypothesized that the acute effects of partial gravity on vestibular, proprioceptive, and sensorimotor functions would negatively impact performance. METHODS Twelve subjects were tested over three flights of 30 parabolas each, including 10 parabolas at 0.25g, 10 parabolas at 0.5g, and 10 parabolas at 0.75g. Subjects also performed tests in 1g between parabolas. During the sit-to-stand with obstacle walk task, subjects rose from a seated position and walked as quickly as possible straight ahead towards a cone (4 m distance), walked around the cone making a 180° left turn, returned, and sat in the chair. On the way to and from the cone, subjects stepped over a 30 cm high obstacle. For the recovery from fall task, subjects lay prone for the pull-up phase and initial 10 sec of the parabola. Then they were asked to rise as quickly as possible and maintain a quiet stance for 10 sec. The tandem rail balance task involved standing with both feet on a 4.5 cm wide rail. The time ended when subjects either stepped off the rail or grabbed on to support straps. The jump down task started with the subjects standing on a 30 cm high platform, then the subjects were instructed to step off the platform, land with both feet simultaneously, and settle in a quiet stance. The cone of stability task involved subjects leaning about the ankles as far as they could in the anterior, posterior, and lateral directions without unfolding their arms or taking a step. The center of pressure distance between endpoints was calculated. Data were collected using inertial measurement units (Opal V2, APDM, Portland, OR) worn on the head and trunk, heart rate monitors (RS800CX, Polar, Kempele, Finland), and a force plate (Bertec, Columbus, OH). RESULTS Gravity level had a significant effect on performance, with the greatest changes from 1g tending to be at the 0.25g level (Table 1). Lower gravity levels were associated with increased times to complete the sit-to-stand obstacle walk task and the recovery from fall task, decreased change in heart rate during the recovery from fall task, decreased rail balance times, and increased cone of stability distance in the anterior-posterior direction. Table 1. Functional task performance at different gravity levels during parabolic flight. Measure0.25g0.5g0.75g1gp-valueSit-to-stand with obstacle walk time (sec)9.8 ±1.4*7.2 ±0.76.9 ±0.8*7.4 ±0.9<0.001Recovery from fall time to settle (sec)5.3 ± 0.9*4.6 ± 0.84.2 ± 0.64.3 ± 0.70.002Recovery from fall change in heart rate (bpm)6.0 ± 7.3*11.2 ± 6.5*14.9 ± 4.915.9 ± 6.5<0.001Rail balance with eyes open time (sec)2.7 ±0.8*4.8 ±2.16.6 ±4.78.4 ±6.70.031Rail balance with eyes closed time (sec)1.6 ±0.4*2.1 ±0.42.4 ±0.62.6 ±0.8<0.001Jump down time to settle (sec)2.1 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.30.328Cone of stability –anterior-posterior (cm)20.8 ±2.7*18.8 ±2.218.6 ±1.717.9 ±2.00.039Cone of stability –lateral (cm)26.8 ±6.624.4 ±2.123.0 ±2.123.8 ±2.30.215p-value: one-way repeated measures analysis of variance; *Significant pairwise difference from 1g (p<0.05). DISCUSSION These data suggest that there is a dose-response relationship between gravity level and functional task performance. The largest changes in performance were expected at the lowest gravity level (0.25g) because subjects would no longer be able to use the gravitational reference for the perception of upright. Understanding the extent of performance deficits informs the risks and design of countermeasures for exploration spaceflight missions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work is supported by NASA’s Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element.

T R Macaulay↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of A Sensorimotor Disorientation Ground Analog

INTRODUCTION Simulating the sensorimotor disorientation effects of gravity transitions after prolonged stays in microgravity is exceedingly challenging on Earth. In a previous study [1], a Sensorimotor Disorientation Analog (SDA) was developed based on subjective feedback from previously flown astronauts. The purpose of this study was to validate this SDA by comparing performance in movement tasks that have a wealth of spaceflight data against task performance while using the SDA. METHODS Thirty healthy non-astronaut subjects (17 males, 13 females; Mean ± SD, Age: 33.5 ± 7.2 years, Height: 68.0 ± 3.4 in, Weight: 164 ± 26 lbs.) volunteered to participate in this study. Subjects performed three movement tasks: computerized dynamic posturography (CDP), obstacle walk, and tandem walk. For CDP, subjects maintained an upright stance for 20s with eyes closed on an unstable pitch sway-referenced platform with head erect (sensory organization test (SOT)-5) and with head pitch ±20° to an auditory cue(SOT-5M). The obstacle walk involved a sit-to-stand with 10s of quiet stance followed by walking to and around a cone placed 4m away while navigating a 30cm obstacle to the cone and back. The tandem walk involved walking heel-to-toe for approximately 10-12 steps with eyes open and eyes closed. Subjects performed the three movement tasks under three levels of the SDA replicating different time points of recovery: none (preflight), low (Return (R)+24- 48hours), and high (R+0- 24hours). The SDA included galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to disorient the vestibular system and a weighted suit (trunk, wrists, and ankles) to alter proprioceptive feedback and replicate subjective heaviness. RESULTS As the SDA magnitude increased, overall performance outcomes decreased. However, the ability of the SDA to replicate the range of astronaut postflight performance was task dependent. CDP SOT-5 performance across SDA levels closely replicated astronaut performance at all time points. SOT-5M, however, had minimal performance changes across SDA levels and was unable to replicate astronaut performance. The obstacle walk showed performance changes across SDA levels and matched astronaut performance preflight and at R+24-48hrs (low). Obstacle walk performance at the high SDA level was reduced in comparison to the low level; however, it was not replicative of astronaut performance immediately after landing. Last, tandem walk had distinct groupings of performance across SDA levels and was able to elicit a high level of disorientation consistent with R+0-24 hours (high) postflight performance for eyes open and eyes closed. The low SDA level for both eyes open and eyes closed was more disruptive than previous crewmember performance at the R+24-48 hours timepoint. CONCLUSION The SDA was developed to replicate postflight sensorimotor disruptions. However, it is well-known that immediately post-landing, astronauts can experience motion sickness, dehydration, fatigue, orthostatic intolerance, illusory sensations, lumbar pain, etc. This multi-system response to return to 1G varies widely across astronauts and, as such, it was not unexpected that the extreme ends of responses in the R+0-24hrs time period were the most difficult to replicate. These results suggest that the SDA levels are able to elicit distinct performance groupings and, although not able to perfectly replicate R+0-24hrs, the SDA did replicate a large range of performance after return to Earth.

S C Moudy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of a Sensorimotor Disorientation Ground Analog

Simulating the sensorimotor disorientation effects of gravity transitions after prolonged stays in microgravity is exceedingly challenging on Earth. In a previous study, a Sensorimotor Disorientation Analog (SDA) was developed based on subjective feedback from previously flown astronauts.

S C Moudy↗